The man is a reasonable type. Homo sapiens - a species that includes four subspecies

Homo sapiens, or Homo sapiens, has undergone many changes since its inception, both in body structure and in social and spiritual development.

The emergence of people who had a modern physical appearance (type) and changed occurred in the late Paleolithic. Their skeletons were first discovered in the Cro-Magnon grotto in France, which is why people of this type were called Cro-Magnons. It was they who had a complex of all the basic physiological features that are characteristic of us. In comparison with that of the Neanderthals, they reached a high level. It is the Cro-Magnons that scientists consider our direct ancestors.

For some time, this type of people existed simultaneously with the Neanderthals, who later died, since only the Cro-Magnons were sufficiently adapted to environmental conditions. It is with them that stone tools go out of use, and they are replaced by more skillfully crafted from bone and horn. In addition, more types of these tools appear - all kinds of drills, scrapers, harpoons and needles appear. This makes people more independent of climatic conditions and allows them to explore new territories. A reasonable person also changes his behavior in relation to his elders, a connection between generations appears - the continuity of traditions, the transfer of experience, knowledge.

Summing up the above, we can highlight the main aspects of the formation of the species Homo sapiens:

1. spiritual and psychological development, which leads to self-knowledge and the development of abstract thinking. As a result - the emergence of art, as evidenced by rock paintings and paintings;
2. pronunciation of articulate sounds (the origin of speech);
3. thirst for knowledge to pass it on to their fellow tribesmen;
4. the creation of new, more advanced tools of labor;
5. which allowed to tame (domesticate) wild animals and cultivate plants.

These events were an important milestone in the development of man. It was they who allowed him not to depend on the environment and

even exercise control over some of its aspects. Homo sapiens continues to undergo changes, the most important of which is

Taking advantage of the benefits of modern civilization, progress, man is still trying to establish power over the forces of nature: changing the course of rivers, draining swamps, populating territories where life was previously impossible.

According to modern classification, the species "Homo sapiens" is divided into 2 subspecies - "Human Idaltu" and "Human". Such a division into subspecies appeared after the discovery in 1997 of the remains, which had some similarities with the skeleton modern man anatomical features, in particular - the size of the skull.

According to scientific data, Homo sapiens appeared 70-60 thousand years ago, and during all this time of its existence as a species, it improved under the influence of only social forces, because no changes were found in the anatomical and physiological structure.

Homosapiens- a species that includes four subspecies - Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Anatoly DEREVYANKO

Photo ITAR-TASS

Until recently, it was believed that a modern human species originated in Africa about 200 thousand years ago.

"Modern biological type" means in this case us. That is, we, today's people, are homo sapiens (more precisely, Homosapienssapiens) are direct descendants of certain creatures that appeared exactly there and then. Previously, they were called Cro-Magnons, but today this designation is considered obsolete.

About 80 thousand years ago, this "modern man" began his victorious march across the planet. Victorious in the literal sense: it is believed that in that campaign he ousted other human forms from life - for example, the famous Neanderthals.

But recently, evidence has emerged that this is not entirely true ...

The following circumstances led to this conclusion.

A few years ago, an expedition of Russian archaeologists and specialists in other sciences, led by the director of the Institute of Archeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Academician Anatoly Derevyanko, discovered the remains of ancient man.

Culturally, he fully corresponded to the level of contemporary sapiens: tools were at the same technological level, and love for jewelry indicated a rather high stage for those times. community development. But biologically...

It turned out that the DNA structure of the found remains differs from the genetic code of living people. But this was not the main sensation. It turned out that this - according to all, we repeat, technological and cultural signs - a reasonable person turned out to be ... an “alien”. According to genetics, he moved away from the common line of ancestors with us at least 800 thousand years ago! Yes, even Neanderthals are kinder to us!

“We are apparently talking about a new species of man that was not previously known to world science,” said Svante Paabo, legendary in professional circles, director of the department of evolutionary genetics at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Well, he knows better: it was he who analyzed the DNA of an unexpected find.

So what happens? While we humans were climbing the evolutionary ladder, was some competitive “humanity” climbing up in parallel with us?

Yes, Academician Derevianko believes. Moreover: in his opinion, there may be at least four such centers where different groups of people aspired to the title of a reasonable person in parallel and independently of each other!

About the main provisions new concept, already sometimes called "a new revolution in anthropology," he told ITAR-TASS.

Before getting to the heart of the matter, let's start with the "pre-revolutionary situation". What was before the current events, what was the picture of human evolution?

We can confidently say that humanity originated in Africa. The first traces of creatures that have learned to make tools are found today in the East African Rift, stretching in the meridional direction from the Dead Sea depression through the Red Sea and further through Ethiopia, Kenya, and Tanzania.

The spread of the first people to Eurasia and their settlement of vast territories in Asia and Europe took place in the mode of gradual development of the most favorable ecological niches for living and then moving to adjacent areas. Scientists attribute the beginning of the process of human penetration into Eurasia to a wide chronological range from 2 to 1 million years ago.

The most numerous population of ancient Homo that emerged from Africa was associated with the species Homo ergaster-erectus and the so-called Aldovan industry. Industry in this context means a certain technology, a culture of stone processing. Oldowan or Oldowan - the most primitive of them, when a stone, most often pebbles, which is why this culture is also called pebble, was split in half to get a sharp edge without additional processing.

About 450–350 thousand years ago, the movement of the second global migration flow from the Middle East began to the east of Eurasia. It is associated with the spread of the late Acheulian industry, in which people made macroliths - stone axes, flakes.

During its advancement, a new human population in many territories met the population of the first migration wave, and therefore there is a mixture of two industries - pebble and Late Acheulean.

But here's what's interesting: judging by the nature of the finds, the second wave reached the territory of only India and Mongolia. She didn't go further. In any case, there is a noticeable difference in the whole industry of Eastern and South-East Asia from the industry of the rest of Eurasia. And this means, in turn, that since the first appearance of the oldest human populations in East and Southeast Asia 1.8–1.3 million years ago, there has been a continuous and independent development of both the physical type of man and his culture. And this alone contradicts the theory of the monocentric origin of man. modern type.

- But you just said that man originated in Africa? ..

It is very important to emphasize, and I did it not by chance: we are talking about a person of the modern anatomical type. According to the monocentric hypothesis, it formed 200–150 thousand years ago in Africa, and 80–60 thousand years ago it began to spread to Eurasia and Australia.

However, this hypothesis leaves many problems unresolved.

For example, researchers are primarily faced with the question: why, if a person of a modern physical type arose at least 150 thousand years ago, then the culture of the Upper Paleolithic, which is associated with Homo sapiens, appeared only 50–40 thousand years ago?

Or: if the Upper Paleolithic culture spread to other continents with modern man, then why did its products appear almost simultaneously in very remote regions of Eurasia? And besides, they differ significantly from each other in terms of the main technical and typological characteristics?

And further. According to archaeological data, a person of a modern physical type settled Australia 50, or maybe 60 thousand years ago, while in the territories adjacent to East Africa African continent he appeared ... later! AT South Africa, judging by anthropological finds, about 40 thousand years ago, in Central and Western - probably about 30 thousand years ago, and only in the North - about 50 thousand years ago. How to explain the fact that modern man first penetrated into Australia, and only then settled on the African continent?

And how, from the point of view of monocentrism, to explain the fact that Homo sapiens was able to overcome a gigantic distance (more than 10 thousand km) in 5-10 thousand years without leaving any traces on the path of its movement? After all, in South, Southeast and East Asia 80–30 thousand years ago, in the event of the replacement of the autochthonous population by newcomers, a complete change in the industry should have occurred, but this is not at all traceable in the east of Asia. Moreover, between the regions with the Upper Paleolithic industry there were territories where the Middle Paleolithic culture continued to exist.

Sailed on something, as some suggest? But in South and East Africa, at the sites of the final stage of the middle and early stages of the Upper Paleolithic, no means of navigation have been found. Moreover, in these industries there are no tools for working wood, and without them it is impossible to build boats and other similar means by which it was possible to go to Australia.

What about genetic data? After all, they show that all modern people are descendants of one “father”, who lived just in Africa and just about 80 thousand years ago ...

Well, in fact, monocentrists, based on the study of DNA variability in modern people It is assumed that it was in the period of 80 - 60 thousand years ago that a population explosion occurred in Africa, and as a result of a sharp increase in population and a lack of food resources, a migration wave spilled into Eurasia.

But with all due respect to the data of genetic studies, it is impossible to believe in the infallibility of these conclusions without any convincing archaeological and anthropological evidence to confirm them. Meanwhile, there are none!

Look here. It must be borne in mind that with an average life expectancy at that time of about 25 years, offspring in most cases remained without parents even at an immature age. With high postnatal and infant mortality, as well as mortality among adolescents due to the early loss of parents, there is no reason to talk about a population explosion.

But even if we agree that 80 - 60 thousand years ago in East Africa there was a rapid population growth, which determined the need to search for new food resources and, accordingly, the settlement of new territories, the question arises: why were migration flows initially directed far to the east? all the way to Australia?

In a word, the vast archaeological material of the studied Paleolithic sites of South, Southeast and East Asia in the range of 60–30 thousand years ago does not allow us to trace the wave of migration of anatomically modern people from Africa. In these territories, there is not only a change in culture, which should have occurred in the event of the replacement of the autochthonous population by newcomers, but also well-defined innovations indicating acculturation. Such authoritative researchers as F.J. Khabgood and N.R. Franklin's conclusion is unambiguous: Indigenous Australians never had the full African "package" of innovations because they were not of African descent.

Or take China. Extensive archaeological material from hundreds of studied Paleolithic sites in East and Southeast Asia testifies to the continuous development of the industry in this area over the past million years. Perhaps, as a result of paleoecological catastrophes (cooling, etc.), the range of ancient human populations in the Sino-Malay zone narrowed, but the archanthropes never left it. Here both the man himself and his culture developed evolutionarily, without any significant outside influences. There is no resemblance to African industries in the chronological interval of 70–30 thousand years ago in Southeast and East Asia. According to the available extensive archaeological material, no migration of people from the west to the territory of China in the chronological interval of 120-30 thousand years ago is also traced.

On the other hand, over the past 50 years, numerous finds have been discovered in China, which make it possible to trace the continuity not only between the ancient anthropological type and modern Chinese populations, but also between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens. In addition, they have a mosaic morphological features. This indicates a gradual transition from one species to another and indicates that human evolution in China is characterized by continuity and hybridization or interspecific crossing.

In other words, the evolutionary development of the Asian Homo erectus took place in East and Southeast Asia for more than 1 million years. This does not exclude the arrival here of small populations from adjacent regions and the possibility of gene exchange, especially in the territories bordering with neighboring populations. But given the proximity of the Paleolithic industries of East and Southeast Asia and their difference from the industries of adjacent western regions, it can be argued that at the end of the Middle - beginning of the Upper Pleistocene, a person of the modern physical type Homo sapiens orientalensis was formed on the basis of the autochthonous erectoid form Homo in East and Southeast Asia, along with Africa.

That is, it turns out that the path to sapiens was traversed by different, independent descendants of erectus? From one cutting, different shoots developed, which then again intertwined into one trunk? How can this be?

Let's look at the history of the Neanderthals to understand this process. Moreover, over 150 years of research, hundreds of different sites, settlements, burials of this species have been studied.

Neanderthals settled mainly in Europe. Their morphological type was adapted to severe climatic conditions northern latitudes. In addition, their Paleolithic locations have also been discovered in the Near East, Western and Central Asia, and southern Siberia.

They were short stocky people with great physical strength. The volume of their brain was 1400 cubic centimeters and was not inferior to the average brain volume of modern people. Many archaeologists drew attention to the great efficiency of the Neanderthal industry at the final stage of the Middle Paleolithic and the presence of many elements of behavior characteristic of a modern human anatomical type. There is much evidence of deliberate burial by Neanderthals of their relatives. They used tools similar to those that developed in parallel in Africa and the East. Many other elements of modern human behavior also appeared in them. It is no coincidence that this species - or subspecies - is also referred to as "intelligent" today: Homo sapiens neanderthalensis.

But he was born in the period of 250 - 300 thousand years ago! That is, it also developed in parallel, not under the influence of the "African" man, which can be designated as Homo sapiens africaniensis . And we are left with only one solution: to consider the transition from the Middle to the Upper Paleolithic in Western and Central Europe as an autochthonous phenomenon.

- Yes, but there are no Neanderthals today! Like there is no Chinese Homosapiensorientalensis…

Yes, according to many researchers, subsequently Neanderthals were replaced in Europe by a man of a modern anatomical type who came out of Africa. But others believe that perhaps the fate of the Neanderthals is not so sad. One of the largest anthropologists, Eric Trinkaus, comparing 75 signs of Neanderthals and modern people, came to the conclusion that about a quarter of the signs are characteristic of both Neanderthals and modern people, the same number - only Neanderthals and about half - modern people.

In addition, data from genetic studies show that up to 4 percent of the genome in modern non-Africans is borrowed from Neanderthals. The well-known researcher Richard Green with co-authors, including geneticists, anthropologists and archaeologists, made a very important remark: "... Neanderthals are equally closely related to the Chinese, Papuans and French." He notes that the results of studying the Neanderthal genome may not be compatible with the hypothesis of the origin of modern humans from a small African population, then crowding out all other forms of Homo and settling around the planet.

At the present level of research, there is no doubt that in the border areas inhabited by Neanderthals and people of modern type, or in the territories of their cross-settlement, there were processes not only of diffusion of cultures, but also of hybridization and assimilation. Homo sapiens neanderthalensis undoubtedly contributed to the morphology and genome of modern humans.

Now is the time to remember your sensational discovery in the Denisovskaya cave in Altai, where another species or subspecies of an ancient man was discovered. And also - the tools are quite sapiens, but genetically - they are not of African origin, and there are more differences with Homo sapiens than with Neanderthals. Although he is not a Neanderthal either ...

As a result of field research in Altai over the past quarter of a century, over 70 cultural horizons belonging to the Early, Middle and Upper Paleolithic have been identified at nine cave sites and more than 10 open sites. The chronological range of 100–30 thousand years ago includes about 60 cultural horizons, including varying degrees saturated with archaeological and paleontological material.

On the basis of extensive materials obtained as a result of field and laboratory research, it can be reasonably argued that the development of human culture in this area occurred as a result of the evolutionary development of the Middle Paleolithic industry without any noticeable influences associated with the infiltration of populations with another culture.

- That is, no one came and did no innovations?

Judge for yourself. In Denisova Cave, 14 cultural layers have been identified, in some of them several habitation horizons have been traced. The most ancient finds, apparently related to the late Acheulian time - early Middle Paleolithic, were recorded in the 22nd layer - 282 ± 56 thousand years ago. Next is the gap. The following cultural horizons from 20 to 12 belong to the Middle Paleolithic, and layers 11 and 9 are Upper Paleolithic. Note that there is no gap here.

In all Middle Paleolithic horizons, a continuous evolution of the stone industry is traced. Of particular importance are materials from cultural horizons 18–12, which belong to the chronological interval of 90–50 thousand years ago. But what is especially important: these are things, in general, of the same level that a person of our biological type had. A clear confirmation of the “modern” behavior of the population of Gorny Altai 50–40 thousand years ago is the bone industry (needles, awls, bases for composite tools) and non-utilitarian items made of bone, stone, shells (beads, pendants, etc.). An unexpected find turned out to be a fragment of a bracelet made of stone, the design of which used several techniques: grinding, polishing, sawing and drilling.

About 45 thousand years ago, an industry of the Mousterian type appeared in Altai. This is the Neanderthal culture. That is, some group of them got here and settled for a while. Apparently, this small population was driven out of Central Asia (for example, Uzbekistan, Teshik-Tash cave) by a man of a modern physical type.

It did not last long on the territory of Altai. Its fate is unknown: either it was assimilated by the autochthonous population, or it died out.

As a result, we see that all the archaeological material accumulated as a result of almost 30 years of field research of multilayer cave sites and open-type sites in Altai convincingly testifies to the autochthonous, independent formation here 50–45 thousand years ago of the Upper Paleolithic industry, one of the most striking and expressive in Eurasia. This means that the formation of the Upper Paleolithic culture, characteristic of modern humans, occurs in Altai as a result of the evolutionary development of the autochthonous Middle Paleolithic industry.

At the same time, genetically they are not “our” people, right? A study conducted by the famous Svante Paabo showed that we are even less related to them than to Neanderthals ...

We did not expect this! After all, judging by the stone and bone industry, the presence of a large number of non-utilitarian items, the methods and techniques of life support, the presence of items obtained by exchange over many hundreds of kilometers, the people who lived in Altai had modern human behavior. And we, archaeologists, were sure that genetically this population belonged to people of the modern anatomical type.

However, the results of the decoding of human nuclear DNA, made on the phalanx of a finger from the Denisova Cave at the same Institute of Population Genetics, were unexpected for everyone. The Denisovan genome deviated from the reference human genome 804 thousand years ago! And they split with the Neanderthals 640,000 years ago.

But there were no Neanderthals back then, were there?

Yes, and this means that the common ancestral population for Denisovans and Neanderthals left Africa more than 800 thousand years ago. And settled, apparently, in the Middle East. And about 600 thousand years ago, part of another part of the population migrated from the Middle East. At the same time, the ancestors of modern man remained in Africa and developed there in their own way.
But on the other hand, Denisovans left 4-6 percent of their genetic material in the genomes of modern Melanesians. Like Neanderthals in Europeans. So, although they did not survive to our time in their appearance, they cannot be attributed to a dead-end branch in human evolution. They are in us!

Thus, in general, human evolution can be represented as follows.

At the heart of the entire chain leading to the emergence of a modern anatomical type in Africa and Eurasia is the ancestral basis of Homo erectus sensu lato. Apparently, the entire evolution of the sapient line of human development is connected with this polytypic species.

The second migration wave of erectoid forms came to Central Asia, South Siberia and Altai about 300 thousand years ago, probably from the Middle East. From this chronological milestone, we trace in Denisova Cave and other locations in caves and open-type sites in Altai the continuous convergent development of stone industries, and, consequently, the very physical type of man.

The industry here was by no means primitive or archaic compared to the rest of Eurasia and Africa. It was focused on the ecological conditions of this particular region. In the Sino-Malay zone, the evolutionary development of both the industry and the anatomical type of the person himself took place on the basis of erectoid forms. This makes it possible to single out a modern type of man, formed in this territory, as a subspecies of Homo sapiens orientalensis.

In the same way, Homo sapiens altaiensis and its material and spiritual culture developed convergently in Southern Siberia.

In turn, Homo sapiens neanderthalensis developed autochthonously in Europe. Here, however, there is a less pure case, since people of the modern type from Africa got here. The form of the relationship between these two subspecies is disputed, but genetics in any case shows that part of the Neanderthal genome is present in modern humans.

Thus, it remains to draw only one conclusion: Homo sapiens is a species that includes four subspecies. These are Homo sapiens africaniensis (Africa), Homo sapiens orientalensis (Southeast and East Asia), Homo sapiens Neanderthalensis (Europe), and Homo sapiens altaiensis (North and Central Asia). All archaeological, anthropological and genetic studies, from our point of view, testify to this!

Alexander Tsyganov (ITAR-TASS, Moscow)

Subsections

In the light of already published and future videos, for the general development and systematization of knowledge, I propose a generalized overview of the genera of the hominid family from the later Sahelanthropes, who lived about 7 million years ago, to Homo sapiens, who appeared from 315 to 200 thousand years ago. This review will help not to fall into the trap of those who like to mislead and systematize their knowledge. Since the video is quite long, for convenience, in the comments there will be a table of contents with a time code, thanks to which you can start or continue watching the video, from the selected genus or species, if you click on the numbers of blue color in the list. 1. Sahelanthropus This genus is represented by only one species: 1.1. The Chadian Sahelanthropus (Sahelanthropus tchadensis) is an extinct species of hominin, about 7 million years old. His skull, named Tumaina, which means "hope for life", was found in the northwest of the Republic of Chad in 2001 by Michel Brunet. The volume of their brain, presumably 380 cubic cm, is approximately the same as that of modern chimpanzees. According to the characteristic location of the occipital foramen, scientists believe that this is the most ancient skull of an upright creature. Sahelanthropus may represent a common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees, but there are still a number of questions about his facial features that may cast doubt on the status of Australopithecus. By the way, the affiliation of sahelanthropes to the human pedigree is disputed by the discoverers of the next genus with the only species Ororin tugensis. 2. Genus Orrorin (Orrorin) includes one species: Orrorin tugensis (Orrorin tugenensis), or man of the millennium, this species was first found in 2000 in the Tugen mountains of Kenya. Its age is about 6 million years. Currently, 20 fossils have been found at 4 sites: these include two parts of the lower jaw; symphyses and several teeth; three fragments of a thigh; partial humerus; proximal phalanx; and the distal phalanx of the thumb. By the way, in Orrorins, the femurs with obvious signs of upright posture, in contrast to the indirect ones in Sahelanthropes. But the rest of the skeleton, except for the skull, indicates that he climbed trees. Orrorins were about 1m tall. 20 centimeters. In addition, related finds indicated that Orrorin did not live in the savannah, but in an evergreen forest environment. By the way, it is this species that is demonstrated by lovers of sensations in anthropology or supporters of ideas about the extraterrestrial origin of people, saying that 6 million years ago aliens visited us. As evidence, they note that this species has a femur closer to a human than that of a later species of Afar australopithecine, named Lucy, 3 million years old, this is true, but understandable, which scientists did 5 years ago, describing the level of primitiveness of similarity and that it is similar to primates that lived 20 million years ago. But on top of that argument, the TV experts report that Orrorin's reconstructed face is flat and human-like. And then take a close look at the images of the finds and find the parts from which you can assemble the face. Don't you see? Me too, but they are there, according to the authors of the programs! At the same time, fragments of a video about completely different finds are shown. This is calculated on the fact that they are trusted by hundreds of thousands, or even millions of viewers, and they will not check. This is how, mixing truth and fiction, a sensation is obtained, but only in the minds of their adherents, and, unfortunately, there are not a few of them. And this is just one example. 3. Ardipithecus (Ardipithecus), an ancient genus of hominids that lived 5.6-4.4 million years ago. At the moment, only two species are described: 3.1. Ardipithecus kadabba (Ardipithecus kadabba) was found in Ethiopia in the valley of the Middle Awash River in 1997. And in 2000, to the north, a few more finds were found. The finds are represented mainly by teeth and fragments of skeletal bones, from several individuals, 5.6 million years old. The following species from the genus Ardipithecus is more qualitatively described. 3.2. Ardipithecus ramidus (Ardipithecus ramidus) or Ardi, which means earth or root. The remains of Ardi were first discovered near the Ethiopian village of Aramis in 1992 in the Afar depression in the Awash River valley. And in 1994, more fragments were obtained, which accounted for 45% of the total skeleton. This is a very significant find, which combines the features of both monkeys and humans. The age of the finds was determined based on their stratigraphic position between two volcanic layers and amounted to 4.4 Ma. And between 1999 and 2003, scientists discovered the bones and teeth of nine more individuals of the Ardipithecus ramidus species, on the northern bank of the Awash River in Ethiopia, west of Hadar. Ardipithecus is similar to most of the primitive previously recognized hominins, but unlike them, Ardipithecus ramidus had a big toe that retained grasping ability, adapted for climbing trees. However, scientists argue that other features of its skeleton reflect an adaptation to upright posture. Like late hominins, Ardi had reduced fangs. Its brain was about the size of a modern chimpanzee and about 20% the size of a modern human brain. Their teeth say that they ate both fruits and leaves without preference, and this is already the path to omnivorousness. In terms of social behavior, slight sexual dimorphism may indicate a decrease in aggression and competition between males in a group. The legs of the ramidus are well suited for walking both in the forest and in the conditions of meadows, swamps and lakes. 4. Australopithecus (Australopithecus), here it should immediately be noted that there is also the concept of Australopithecus, which includes 5 more genera and is divided into 3 groups: a) early Australopithecus (7.0 - 3.9 million years ago). years ago); b) gracile australopithecines (3.9 - 1.8 million years ago); c) massive australopithecines (2.6 - 0.9 million years ago). But Australopithecus as a genus is a fossil higher primate with signs of upright walking and anthropoid features in the structure of the skull. Who lived in the period from 4.2 to 1.8 million years ago. Let's consider 6 types of Australopithecus: 4.1. The Australopithecus anamensis of Anamen is believed to be the ancestor of humans, who lived about four million years ago. Fossils have been found in Kenya and Ethiopia. The first find of the species was discovered in 1965 near Lake Turkana in Kenya, previously the lake was called Rudolf. Then, in 1989, teeth of this species were found on the northern coast of Turkana, but on the territory of modern Ethiopia. And already in 1994, about a hundred additional fragments from two dozen hominids were discovered, including one complete lower jaw, with teeth resembling human ones. And only in 1995, on the basis of the described finds, the species was identified as Anamsky Australopithecus, which is considered a descendant of the species Ardipithecus ramidus. And in 2006, a new find of the Anaman Australopithecus was announced, in northeastern Ethiopia, about 10 km. from the site of the finds of Ardipithecus ramidus. The age of the Anamese australopithecines is about 4-4.5 million years. Anamsky Australopithecus is considered the ancestor of the following species of Australopithecus. 4.2. The Afar Australopithecus (Australopithecus afarensis), or "Lucy", after the first find, is an extinct hominid that lived between 3.9 and 2.9 million years ago. The Afar Australopithecus was closely related to the genus Homo, as a direct ancestor or close relative unknown common ancestor. Lucy herself, 3.2 million years old, was discovered in 1974 in the Afar Basin near the village of Hadar in Ethiopia on November 24. "Lucy" was represented by an almost complete skeleton. And the name "Lucy" was inspired by the Beatles song "Lucy in the sky with diamonds." Afar australopithecines have also been found in other localities such as Omo, Maka, Feige and Belohdeli in Ethiopia and Koobi Fore and Lotagam in Kenya. Representatives of the species had fangs and molars relatively larger than those of modern humans, and the brain was still small - from 380 to 430 cubic cm - the face was with protruding lips. Anatomy of the hands, feet and shoulder joints suggests that the creatures were partially arboreal and not only terrestrial, although in general anatomy the pelvis is much more human-like. However, due to the anatomical structure, they could already walk with an upright gait. The upright posture of the Afar Australopithecus may just be due to climate change in Africa from the jungle to the savannah. In Tanzania, 20 km from the Sadiman volcano, in 1978 footprints of a family of upright hominids were discovered, preserved in volcanic ash south of Olduvai Gorge. Based on sexual dimorphism - the difference in body size between males and females - these creatures most likely lived in small family groups containing one dominant and larger male and several small breeding females. "Lucy" would live in a group culture that involves communication. In 2000, the skeletal remains of what is believed to be a 3-year-old child of Afar australopithecines, who lived 3.3 million years ago, were discovered in the Dikik area. These Australopithecus, according to archaeological finds, used stone tools for cutting meat from animal carcasses and crushing. But this is only the use, not the manufacture of them. 4.3. The Bahr el Ghazal Australopithecus (Australopithecus bahrelghazali) or Abel is a fossil hominin first discovered in 1993 in the Bahr el Ghazal Valley at the Koro Toro archaeological site in Chad. Abel is approximately 3.6-3 million years old. The find consists of a mandibular fragment, the lower second incisor, both the lower canines and all four of its premolars. AT separate view this australopithecine was in this due to its lower three root premolars. It is also the first australopithecine discovered north of the previous ones, which indicates their wide distribution. 4.4 The African Australopithecus (Australopithecus africanus) was an early hominid that lived 3.3 to 2.1 million years ago during the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene. Unlike the previous species, it had a larger brain and more human-like features. Many scientists believe that he is the ancestor of modern humans. The African Australopithecus has only been found at four sites in southern Africa - Taung in 1924, Sterkfontein in 1935, Makapansgat in 1948 and Gladysvale in 1992. The first find was a baby skull known as the "Taung Baby" and described by Raymond Dart, who named it Australopithecus africanus, meaning "southern monkey of Africa". He claimed that this species was intermediate between apes and humans. Further discoveries confirmed their separation into a new species. This australopithecine was a bipedal hominid with arms slightly longer than legs. Despite its somewhat more human-like cranial features, other more primitive features are present, including simian-like, curved climbing fingers. But the pelvis was more adapted to bipedalism than in the previous species. 4.5. Australopithecus garhi (Australopithecus garhi), 2.5 million years old, was discovered in Ethiopia in the Bowri deposits. "Garhi" means "surprise" in the local Afar language. For the first time, tools similar to the Aldovan culture of stone processing were found along with the remains. 4.6. Australopithecus sediba (Australopithecus sediba) is a species of australopithecines of the early Pleistocene, represented by fossils dating back to about 2 million years. This species is known from four incomplete skeletons found in South Africa in a place called the "cradle of mankind", 50 km northwest of Johannesburg, within the Malapa cave. The discovery was made thanks to the service Google Planet Earth. "Sediba" means "spring" in the Sotho language. Australopithecus sediba, two adults, and one 18-month-old infant were found together. In total, more than 220 fragments have been excavated so far. Australopithecus sediba may have lived in the savannah, but the diet included fruits and other forest products. The height of the sediba was about 1.3 meters. The first specimen of Australopithecus sediba was discovered by 9-year-old Matthew, son of paleoanthropologist Lee Berger, on August 15, 2008. The mandible found was part of a young male whose skull was discovered later in March 2009 by Berger and his team. Also in the area of ​​the cave were found fossils of various animals, including saber-toothed cats, mongooses and antelopes. The volume of the brain of a sediba was about 420-450 cubic cm, which is about three times less than that of modern people. Australopithecus sediba had amazing modern hand , whose grip accuracy involves the use and manufacture of the tool. Sediba probably belonged to a late South African branch of Australopithecus, which coexisted with members of the genus Homo already living at that time. Currently, some scientists are trying to clarify the dates and look for a connection between Australopithecus sediba and the genus Homo. 5. Paranthropus (Paranthropus) - a genus of fossil higher primates. They have been found in East and South Africa. They are also called massive australopithecines. Paranthropus finds are dated from 2.7 to 1 million years ago. 5.1. Ethiopian Paranthropus (Paranthropus aethiopicus or Australopithecus aethiopicus) The species was described from a 1985 find in the Turkana Lake area, Kenya, known as the "black skull" due to its dark color due to its manganese content. The skull has been dated to 2.5 million years. But later, part of the lower jaw, discovered in 1967 in the Omo River Valley, Ethiopia, was also attributed to this species. Anthropologists believe that the Ethiopian Paranthropus lived between 2.7 and 2.5 million years ago. They were quite primitive and share many features with the Afar Australopithecus, possibly being their direct descendants. Their special feature was strongly protruding jaws. This species is believed to diverge from the Homo lineage on the evolutionary branch of the hominid tree. 5.2. Boise's Paranthropus (Paranthropus boisei) aka Australopithecus boisei, aka "The Nutcracker" was an early hominin described as the largest of the Paranthropus genus. They lived in East Africa during the Pleistocene era from about 2.4 to 1.4 million years ago. The largest skull found at Konso in Ethiopia dates back to 1.4 million years. They were 1.2-1.5 m tall, and weighed from 40 to 90 kg. The well-preserved skull of the paranthropus bois was first discovered in Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania in 1959 and was given the name Nutcracker, due to its large teeth and thick enamel. It has been dated at 1.75 million. And 10 years later, in 1969, the son of the discoverer of the "Nutcracker" Mary Leakey Richard discovered another skull of paranthropus boyes in Koobi Fora near Lake Turkana in Kenya. Judging by the structure of the jaws, they ate massive plant foods, and lived in forests and shrouds. According to the structure of the skull, scientists believe that the brain of these Paranthropus was quite primitive, up to 550 cubic cm in volume. 5.3. Paranthropus massive (Paranthropus robustus). The first skull of this species was discovered at Kromdraai in South Africa in 1938 by a schoolboy who later traded it for chocolate to anthropologist Robert Broom. Paranthropus or Massive Australopithecus were bipedal hominids that probably evolved from graceful australopithecines. They are characterized by strong skullcaps, and gorilla-like cranial ridges that suggest strong chewing muscles. They lived between 2 and 1.2 million years ago. The remains of massive paranthropes have been found only within South Africa at Kromdraai, Swartkrans, Drimolen, Gondolin and Coopers. The remains of 130 individuals were found in a cave in Swartkrans. Dental studies have shown that massive paranthropes rarely lived to 17 years of age. The approximate height of the males was about 1.2 m, and their weight was about 54 kg. But the females were a little less than 1 meter tall and weighed about 40 kg, which indicates a rather large sexual dimorphism. Their brain size ranged from 410 to 530 cc. see. They ate rather massive food, such as tubers and nuts, possibly from open forests and savannahs. 6. Kenyanthropus (Kenyanthropus) a genus of hominids who lived from 3.5 to 3.2 million years ago in the Pliocene. This genus is represented by one species, Kenyanthropus flatface, but some scientists consider it a separate species of Australopithecus, like Australopithecus flatface, while others attribute it to Afar Australopithecus. 6.1. The flat-faced Kenyanthropus (Kenyanthropus platyops) was found on the Kenyan side of Lake Turkana in 1999. These Kenyanthropes lived from 3.5 to 3.2 million years ago. This species remains a mystery, and suggests that 3.5 - 2 million years ago there were several humanoid species, each of which was well adapted to life in a certain environment. 7. The genus People or Homo includes both extinct species and Homo sapiens. Extinct species classified as ancestral, especially Homo erectus, or as closely related to modern humans. The earliest members of the genus this moment , date back to 2.5 million years. 7.1. Homo gautengensis is a hominin species that was isolated in 2010 after a fresh look at a skull found back in 1977 in the Sterkfontein Cave in Johannesburg, South Africa, Gotheng Province. This species is represented by South African fossil hominins, formerly referred to as Handy Man (Homo habilis), Working Man (Homo ergaster), or in some cases Australopithecus. But Australopithecus sediba, who lived at the same time as Homo Gautengensis, turned out to be much more primitive. Homo gautengensis has been identified from skull fragments, teeth, and other parts found at various times in caves at a site called the Cradle of Humankind in South Africa. The oldest specimens are dated at 1.9-1.8 million years. The youngest specimens from Swartkrans date from about 1.0 million to 600 thousand years. According to the description, Homo Gautengensis had large teeth suitable for chewing plants and a small brain, most likely he consumed mainly plant foods, in contrast to Homo erectus, Homo sapiens and, probably, Homo habilis. According to scientists, he produced and used stone tools, and judging by the burnt animal bones found with the remains of Homo Gautengensis, these hominins used fire. They were a little over 90 cm tall, and their weight was about 50 kg. Homo Gautengensis walked on two legs, but also spent considerable time in the trees, possibly feeding, sleeping, and sheltering from predators. 7.2. Rudolf man (Homo rudolfensis), a species of the genus Homo, who lived 1.7-2.5 million years ago, was first discovered in 1972 on Lake Turkana in Kenya. However, the remains were first described in 1978 by the Soviet anthropologist Valery Alekseev. Remains have also been found in Malawi in 1991 and in Koobi-fora, Kenya in 2012. Rudolf man coexisted in parallel with Homo habilis or skillful man and they could interact. Possibly ancestral to later Homo species. 7.3. Handyman (Homo habilis) is a species of fossil hominin that is considered to be a representative of our ancestors. Lived from about 2.4 to 1.4 million years ago, during the Gelazian Pleistocene. The first finds were discovered in Tanzania in 1962-1964. Homo habilis was thought to be the earliest known species of the genus Homo, until the discovery of Homo Gautengensis in 2010. Homo habilis was short and had disproportionately long arms compared to modern humans, but with a flatter face than Australopithecus. The volume of his skull was less than half compared to modern humans. His finds are often accompanied by primitive stone tools from the Olduvai culture, hence the name "Handyman". And if it is easier to describe, then the body of the habilis resembles Australopithecus, with a more human-like face and smaller teeth. Whether Homo habilis was the first hominid to possess stone tool technology remains debatable, as Australopithecus garhi, dated at 2.6 million years old, has been found with similar stone tools, and is at least 100,000 to 200,000 years older than Homo habilis. Homo habilis lived in parallel with other bipedal primates such as Paranthropus boisei. But Homo habilis, perhaps through the use of a tool and a more varied diet, appears to have been the forerunner of a whole line of new species by dental analysis, while the remains of Paranthropus boisei have not been found again. It is also possible that Homo habilis coexisted with Homo erectus around 500,000 years ago. 7.4. Homo ergaster is an extinct but one of the earliest species of Homo that lived in eastern and southern Africa during the early Pleistocene, 1.8 - 1.3 million years ago. Man working, named for his advanced technology hand tools, it is sometimes referred to as the African Homo erectus. Some researchers consider a person working, the ancestor of the Acheulean culture, while other scientists award the palm to the early erectus. There is also evidence of their use of fire. The remains were first discovered in 1949 in southern Africa. And the most complete skeleton was found in Kenya on the western shore of Lake Turkana, it belonged to a teenager and was called "The Boy from Turkana" or also "Nariokotome Boy", his age was 1.6 million years. Often this find is classified as Homo erectus. Homo ergaster is believed to have diverged from the Homo habilis lineage between 1.9 and 1.8 million years ago and existed for about half a million years in Africa. Scientists also believe that they quickly became sexually mature, even in their youth. Its distinguishing feature was also rather tall, about 180 cm. The working person also has less sexual dimorphism than Austropithecus, and this may mean more prosocial behavior. His brain was already larger, up to 900 cubic centimeters. Some scientists believe that they could use a proto-language based on the structure of the cervical vertebrae, but this is only speculation at the moment. 7.5. The Dmanisian hominid (Homo georgicus) or (Homo erectus georgicus) is the first member of the Homo genus to leave Africa. Finds dating back to 1.8 million years were discovered in Georgia in August 1991, described in different years also as Georgian Man (Homo georgicus), Homo erectus georgicus, Dmanisi hominid (Dmanisi) and as Working Man (Homo ergaster). But it was singled out as a separate species and, together with erectus and ergaster, they are also often called archanthropes, or if you add here the Heidelberg man of Europe and Sinanthropus from China, you will already get Pithecanthropes. In 1991 by David Lordkipanidze. Along with ancient human remains, tools and animal bones were found. The brain volume of Dmanisian hominids is approximately 600-700 cubic centimeters - two times less than that of modern humans. This is the smallest hominid brain found outside of Africa, other than the Floresian man (Homo floresiensis). The Dmanisian hominid was bipedal and shorter than the abnormally tall ergaster, the average height of males was about 1.2m. Dental conditions indicate omnivory. But among the archaeological finds, evidence of the use of fire was not found. Possibly a descendant of Rudolf Man. 7.6. Homo erectus, or simply Erectus, is an extinct species of hominin that lived from the late Pliocene to the late Pleistocene, approximately 1.9 million to 300,000 years ago. About 2 million years ago, the climate in Africa just changed to drier. long time existence and migration could not but create many different views of scientists on this species. According to the available data and their interpretation, the species originated in Africa, then migrated to India, China and to the island of Java. In general, Homo erectus settled in the warm parts of Eurasia. But some scientists suggest that erectus appeared in Asia and only then migrated to Africa. Erectus have existed for over a million years, longer than other human species. The classification and lineage of Homo erectus is quite controversial. But there are some subspecies of erectus. 7.6.1 Pithecanthropus or "Javanese Man" - Homo erectus erectus 7.6.2 Yuanmou Man - Homo erectus yuanmouensis 7.6.3 Lantian Man - Homo erectus lantianensis 7.6.4 Nanjing Man - Homo erectus nankinensis 7.6.5 Sinanthropus or "Beijing Man" - Homo erectus pekinensis 7.6.6 Meganthrope - Homo erectus palaeojavanicus 7.6.7 Javanthrope or Soloyan man - Homo erectus soloensis 7.6.8 Man from Totavel - Homo erectus tautavelensis 7.6.9 Dmanisian hominid - Homo erectus georgicus 7.6.10 Man from Bilzingsleben - Homo erectus bilzingslebenensis 7.6.11 Atlantrope or Moorish man - Homo erectus mauritanicus 7.6.12 Cherpano man - Homo cepranensis, some scientists distinguish it, like many other subspecies, into a separate species, but the 1994 find in the vicinity of Rome is represented only by a skull, therefore little data for a more thorough analysis. Homo erectus got its name for a reason, its legs were adapted for both walking and running. The temperature exchange was increased due to rarer and short hair on the body. It is possible that erectus have already become hunters. Smaller teeth may indicate a change in diet, most likely due to fire treatment. And this is already a way to increase the brain, the volume of which in erectus varied from 850 to 1200 cubic cm. They were up to 178 cm tall. Erectus sexual dimorphism was less than that of its predecessors. They lived in hunter-gatherer groups and hunted together. They used fire both for warmth and cooking, and to scare away predators. They made tools, hand axes, flakes, and in general were carriers of the Acheulean culture. In 1998, there were suggestions that they were building rafts. 7.7. Homo antecessor is an extinct human species, between 1.2 million and 800,000 years old. Found in the Sierra de Atapuerca in 1994. The fossil of the upper jaw and part of the skull, 900 thousand years old, discovered in Spain, belonged to a boy of a maximum of 15 years. Many bones, both animal and human, were found nearby, bearing marks that could indicate cannibalism. Nearly all of those eaten were teenagers or children. At the same time, there was no evidence indicating a lack of food in the vicinity at that time. They were about 160-180 cm tall and weighed about 90 kg. The volume of the human brain of the previous (Homo antecessor) was about 1000-1150 cubic centimeters. Scientists suggest a rudimentary ability to speak. 7.8. Heidelberg man (Homo heidelbergensis) or protanthropus (Protanthropus heidelbergensis) is an extinct species of the genus Homo, which may be the direct ancestor of both the Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis), if we consider its development in Europe, and Homo sapiens, but only in Africa. The discovered remains were dated from 800 to 150 thousand years. The first records of this species were made in 1907 by Daniel Hartmann in the village of Mauer in southwestern Germany. After that, representatives of the species were found in France, Italy, Spain, Greece and China. Also in 1994, a discovery was made in England near the village of Boxgrove, hence the name "Man from Boxgrove" (Boxgrove Man). However, there is also the name of the area - "horse slaughterhouse", which involves butchering horse carcasses with stone tools. Heidelberg man used the tools of the Acheulean culture, sometimes with transitions to the Mousterian culture. They averaged 170 cm in height, and in South Africa there were finds of individuals with a height of 213 cm. and which were dated from 500 to 300 thousand years. Heidelberg man may have been the first species to bury their dead, based on 28 remains found in Atapuerca, Spain. He may have used tongue and red ocher as decoration, as evidenced by finds at Terra Amata near Nice on the slopes of Mount Boron. Dental analysis suggests they were right-handed. Heidelberg man (Homo heidelbergensis) was an advanced hunter, judging by hunting tools such as spears from Schöningen in Germany. 7.8.1. Rhodesian man (Homo rhodesiensis) is an extinct subspecies of hominins that lived from 400 to 125 thousand years ago. The Kabwe fossil skull is a typical specimen of this species, found in the Broken Hill Caves in Northern Rhodesia, now Zambia, by the Swiss miner Tom Zwieglaar in 1921. Previously, it stood out as a separate species. The Rhodesian man was massive, with very large eyebrows and a broad face. He is sometimes called the "African Neanderthal", although he has intermediate features between sapiens and Neanderthals. 7.9. Florisbad (Homo helmei) is described as an "archaic" Homo sapiens that lived 260,000 years ago. Represented by a partially preserved skull that was discovered in 1932 by Professor Dreyer within the archaeological and paleontological site of Florisbad near Bloemfontein in South Africa. It may be an intermediate form between Heidelberg man (Homo heidelbergensis) and Homo sapiens. Florisbad was the same size as a modern human, but with a large brain volume of about 1400 cubic cm. 7.10 The Neanderthal (Homo neanderthalensis) is an extinct species or subspecies within the genus Homo, closely related to, and interbred with, modern humans. The term "Neanderthal" comes from the modern spelling of the Neander Valley in Germany, where the species was first discovered in the Feldhofer Cave. Neanderthals existed, according to genetic data, from 600 thousand years ago, and according to archaeological finds from 250 to 28 thousand years ago, with the last refuge in Gibraltar. The finds are currently being intensively studied and it makes no sense to describe in more detail, since I will return to this species again and possibly more than once. 7.11. Homo Naledi Fossils were discovered in 2013 in the Dinaledi Chamber, Rising Star Cave System, Gauteng Province in South Africa and were quickly recognized as the remains of a new species in 2015, and distinct from the remains found previously. In 2017, the finds are dated from 335 to 236 thousand years ago. The remains of fifteen individuals, both male and female, were recovered from the cave, among them were children. The new kind named Homo naledi, it has an unexpected combination of modern and primitive features, including a rather small brain. The growth of "Naledi" was about one and a half meters, the volume of the brain was from 450 to 610 cubic meters. See The word "ice" means "star" in the Sotho-Tswana languages. 7.12. Floresian man (Homo floresiensis) or Hobbit is an extinct dwarf species of the genus Homo. The Floresian man lived from 100 to 60 thousand years ago. Archaeological remains were discovered by Mike Morewood in 2003 on the island of Flores in Indonesia. Incomplete skeletons of nine individuals have been recovered, including one complete skull, from Liang Bua Cave. A distinctive feature of hobbits, as the name implies, is their height, about 1 meter and a small brain, about 400 cm3. Stone tools were found along with skeletal remains. There is still debate about the Floresian man, whether he could make tools with such a brain. The theory was put forward that the found skull is a microcephalic. But most likely this species evolved from erectus or other species in isolation on the island. 7.13. Denisovans (Denisova hominin) are Paleolithic members of the genus Homo that may belong to a previously unknown human species. It is believed to be the third person from the Pleistocene who has demonstrated a level of adaptation previously thought to be unique to modern humans and Neanderthals. Denisovans occupied large territories, stretching from cold Siberia to the tropical rainforests of Indonesia. In 2008, Russian scientists, in Denisova Cave or Ayu-Tash, in the Altai Mountains, discovered the distal phalanx of a girl's finger, from which mitochondrial DNA was later isolated. The mistress of the phalanx lived in a cave about 41 thousand years ago. This cave was also inhabited by Neanderthals and modern humans at different times. In general, there are not many finds, including teeth and part of the phalanx of the toe, as well as various tools and jewelry, including a bracelet not made of local material. Analysis of the mitochondrial DNA of the finger bone showed that Denisovans are genetically different from Neanderthals and modern humans. They may have split from the Neanderthal line after the split with the Homo sapiens line. Recent analyzes have also shown that they overlapped with our species, and even interbred multiple times, at different times. Up to 5-6% of the DNA of the Melanesians and Australian Aborigines contain Denisovan admixtures. And modern non-Africans have about 2-3% impurities. In 2017, in China, fragments of skulls were found, with a large brain volume, up to 1800 cubic cm and an age of 105-125 thousand years. Some scientists based on their description suggested that they could belong to the Denisovans, but these versions are currently controversial. 7.14. Idaltu (Homo sapiens idaltu) is an extinct subspecies of Homo sapiens that lived about 160 thousand years ago in Africa. "Idaltu" means "firstborn". Fossils of Homo sapiens idaltu were discovered in 1997 by Tim White at Kherto Buri in Ethiopia. Although the morphology of the skulls indicates archaic features not found in later Homo sapiens, they are still considered by scientists to be the direct ancestors of modern Homo sapiens sapiens. 7.15. Homo sapiens is a species of the hominin family from a large detachment of primates. And it is the only living species of this genus, that is, us. If someone is reading or listening to this is not of our kind, write in the comments ...). Representatives of the species first appeared in Africa about 200 or 315 thousand years ago, given the latest data from Jebel Irhud, but there are still many questions. Then they spread almost all over the planet. Although in more modern form as Homo sapiens sapiens, well, a very intelligent person, appeared a little over 100 thousand years ago, according to some anthropologists. Also in early times, in parallel with people, other species and populations developed, such as Neanderthals and Denisovans, as well as the Soloy man or Javanthropus, the Ngandong man and the Callao Man, as well as others that do not fit into the species. A reasonable man, but according to dating, who lived at the same time. As for example: 7.15.1. The Red Deer Cave people are an extinct population of humans, the latest known to science, that does not fit within the variability of Homo sapiens. And possibly belongs to another species of the genus Homo. They were discovered in the south of China in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in the Longlin cave in 1979. The age of the remains is from 11.5 to 14.3 thousand years. Although they may well be the results of cross-breeding between different populations that lived at that time. These issues will still be discussed on the channel, so a brief description is enough for now. And now, who watched the video from beginning to end, put the letter "P" in the comments, and if in parts then "H", only to be honest!

Homo sapiens, a species to which modern man belongs. It developed from Homo erectus about 200-400 thousand years ago. the bones became less massive, the back of the head became more rounded. The subsequent development of "Ch.r." it is not clear, because This species is divided into two branches. One leads to the Neanderthal (Homo sapiens neanderthalensis), the other - to the modern. to humans (Homo sapiens). The development of the latter took approx. 125 thousand years. Anatomical and genetic evidence supports the assumption that it appeared in Africa, but possibly in parallel in the Far East. On Bl. East people settled approx. 50 thousand years ago. In Europe, they appeared a little later - approx. 35 thousand years ago. The very first European inhabitants of modern type is often called Cro-Magnon. It is not known what role was played in this process on Bl. East and Europe Neanderthals. It is very likely that they were not our direct ancestors. But it is possible that they mixed with the "Ch.R.", which came to Europe from Africa through Bl. East.

With the development of "Ch.r." it means that the tools of labor have improved, the number has sharply increased. population, there was an association of people. activities in places of residence and the emergence of lawsuits. A period called the Upper Paleolithic began. The Upper Paleolithic man must have developed speech. As we grow. there was a settlement of new territories, which, apparently, began shortly after the appearance of "Ch.r." People migrated from Indonesia to New Guinea and Australia at least ca. 40 thousand years ago; there, in conditions of isolation from other representatives of the genus, developed character traits australoids. The timing of the first human settlement in the New World is debatable. It probably happened at St. 15 thousand years ago. Archeol. evidence of earlier settlement is practically absent, but the genetic, linguistic and anatomical features of the modern. American Indians indicate that the first resettlement in the North. America happened between 40 and 30 thousand years ago.

MAN REASONABLE(Homo sapiens) - a man of the modern type.

The course of evolution from Homo erectus to Homo sapiens, i.e. to the modern human stage, is just as difficult to satisfactorily document as the initial branching off of the hominid lineage. However, in this case, the matter is complicated by the presence of several applicants for such an intermediate position.

According to a number of anthropologists, the step that led directly to Homo sapiens was the Neanderthal (Homo neanderthalensis or Homo sapiens neanderthalensis). Neanderthals appeared no later than 150 thousand years ago, and their various types flourished until a period of approx. 40-35 thousand years ago, marked by the undoubted presence of well-formed H. sapiens (Homo sapiens sapiens). This epoch corresponded to the onset of the Wurm glaciation in Europe, i.e. ice age closest to modern times. Other scientists do not connect the origin of modern humans with Neanderthals, pointing out, in particular, that the morphological structure of the face and skull of the latter was too primitive to have time to evolve to the forms of Homo sapiens.

Neanderthaloids are usually imagined as stocky, hairy, animal-like humans with bent legs, protruding heads on a short neck, giving the impression that they have not yet fully achieved upright posture. Paintings and reconstructions in clay usually emphasize their hairiness and unjustified primitiveness. This image of a Neanderthal is a big distortion. First, we don't know if Neanderthals were hairy or not. Secondly, they were all completely upright. As for the evidence of the inclined position of the body, it is likely that they were obtained from the study of individuals suffering from arthritis.

One of the most surprising features of the entire Neanderthal series of finds is that the least recent of them were the most recent in appearance. This is the so-called. the classic Neanderthal type, whose skull is characterized by a low forehead, a heavy brow, a sloping chin, a protruding mouth area, and a long, low skullcap. However, their brain volume was larger than that of modern humans. They certainly had a culture: there is evidence of funerary cults and possibly animal cults, since animal bones are found along with the fossils of classical Neanderthals.

At one time it was believed that the classical Neanderthals lived only in the southern and Western Europe, and their origin is associated with the onset of the glacier, which put them in conditions of genetic isolation and climatic selection. However, apparently similar forms are later found in some regions of Africa and the Middle East, and possibly in Indonesia. Such a wide distribution of the classical Neanderthal forces us to abandon this theory.

At the moment, there is no material evidence of any gradual morphological transformation of the classical type of Neanderthal into the modern type of man, with the exception of finds made in the Skhul cave in Israel. The skulls found in this cave are very different from each other, some of them have features that put them in an intermediate position between the two human types. According to some experts, this is evidence of the evolutionary change of the Neanderthal to modern humans, while others believe that this phenomenon is the result of intermarriage between representatives of two types of people, thus believing that Homo sapiens evolved independently. This explanation is supported by evidence that as early as 200–300 thousand years ago, i.e. before the advent of the classical Neanderthal, there was a type of human that most likely refers to the early Homo sapiens, and not to the "progressive" Neanderthal. We are talking about well-known finds - skull fragments found in Swanscom (England), and a more complete skull from Steinheim (Germany).

Differences in the question of the "Neanderthal stage" in human evolution are partly due to the fact that two circumstances are not always taken into account. First, it is possible for the more primitive types of any evolving organism to exist relatively unchanged at the same time that other branches of the same species are undergoing various evolutionary modifications. Secondly, migrations associated with a shift in climatic zones are possible. Such shifts were repeated in the Pleistocene as glaciers advanced and retreated, and man could follow shifts in the climatic zone. Thus, when considering long periods of time, it must be taken into account that the populations occupying a given area at a certain moment are not necessarily descendants of populations that lived there for more than early period. It is possible that early Homo sapiens could migrate from the regions where they appeared, and then return to their former places after many thousands of years, having managed to undergo evolutionary changes. When the fully developed Homo sapiens appeared in Europe 35,000 to 40,000 years ago, during the warmer period of the last glaciation, it undoubtedly supplanted the classical Neanderthal that had occupied the same region for 100,000 years. Now it is impossible to determine for sure whether the Neanderthal population moved north, following the retreat of its usual climatic zone, or whether it mixed with Homo sapiens invading its territory.