What is the population of the earth at the moment. How many people on earth
Incredible Facts
What would happen if the entire population of the Earth, all 7.6 billion people lived in one city?
How big or small would this city be, and how cramped would it be for us to live in it?
Here you can find out how massive such a city would be.
In fact, the answer to the question posed depends on how closely you want people to live next to each other.
earth population
At the beginning of 2017, almost 7.5 billion people lived on Earth. This figure is so impressive that it is extremely difficult to imagine such a huge number of people in one place.
Let's look at real examples of densely populated cities and regions to understand this better.
If all the people of the Earth lived with the same population density as in Manila(Philippines), then the entire human race would fit in an area the size of Tunisia.
What if the population density were the same as in Manhattan, then we would all fit in New Zealand.
Theoretically, this would leave more than 99% of the planet Earth completely uninhabited. Of course, the main problem would be resources - food, metals and energy. To satisfy the needs of all people, they would have to be obtained from other places on the planet.
Let's take for example Singapore, currently the most populous country in the world, with an average of 7,605 people per square kilometer. With such a population density, all people could fit in an area the size of the state of Texas.
Interesting fact:
But there are places on Earth with even higher population density. Midtown Manhattan's average population density is 26,939 people per 1 sq. km. Given this density, we could all squeeze into a place the size of Ecuador - that's 283,560 square kilometers, or almost 5,000 manhattans.
However, the record holder in population density is the now ruined fortress city Kowloon who was based in Hong Kong.
Before it was demolished in 1987, Kowloon was home to 33,000 people living on an area of 0.26 sq. km (an area equal to about three football fields).
If all the inhabitants of the Earth lived as densely next to each other, then they would fit (without roads, infrastructure and high-rise buildings) into the city Shanghai with an area of approximately 6,300 sq. km. But if you build a lot of skyscrapers on such an area, then the area would decrease significantly.
If the density were the same as in Kowloon, then exactly this area would be occupied by the entire population of the Earth (you can compare it with Greater Tokyo - the largest urbanized region in the world):
The impact of climate on the population
It would seem completely pointless to imagine one city for the whole world, but with the real threat of climate change in the near future, there may not be many inhabited places on Earth.
According to the UN, by the end of the 21st century, the world's population will be over 11 billion people. Not only does this mean that we will need to expand the boundaries of cities, it will also put an additional strain on the Earth's resources.
In a 2010 study published in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - a leading American journal that contains publications of original scientific research from various fields), scientists at the Australian National University showed that as a result of increasing temperatures on Earth, the planet may become completely uninhabitable.
Another study published last year in the journal Nature Climate Change predicted that strong heatwaves could affect Persian Gulf areas and make the cities of Doha, Abu Dhabi and Bandar Abbas uninhabitable within the next 100 years.
With this in mind, people may have to move to smaller and more densely populated areas. In this case, it remains hopeful that we can colonize Mars.
It is worth noting that today the most densely populated area of \u200b\u200bthe Earth is the territory where the slums are located. Dharavi in Indian Mumbai. On the territory of about 2,165 sq. km is home to about 1 million people. It is worth noting that it was in these slums that the family of the protagonist of the film "Slumdog Millionaire" lived.
Population density
Let's dream a little and imagine a situation in which all the inhabitants of the Earth gathered in one place just to stand next to each other.
How many people could fit in the countries below if people stood next to each other?
Russia: 16,377,742,000,000 (16.37 trillion)
USA: 9,158,960,000.000 (9.15 trillion)
Canada: 9,093,507,000,000 (9.09 trillion)
Australia: 7,682,300,000,000 (7.68 trillion)
India: 2,973,193,000,000 (2.97 trillion)
Egypt: 995,450,000,000 (995 billion)
United Kingdom: 241,930,000,000 (242 billion)
Ireland: 68,883,000,000 (69 billion)
To fill the entire area of the Earth, equal to 148,940,000 sq. km, it would takeover 148,940,000,000,000 people (148.94 trillion), which is 19,600% more than today's 7.6 billion people.
The population of the planet Earth on a plane
How many people can fit in one square meter?
Several Canadian journalists wondered how many people would fit in one square meter. They tried several options and came to the conclusion that, on average, on an area of 1 sq. meter fit 9 people of average height and build (each occupies an area of approximately 33 cm x 33 cm).
But this is if you use adults. What about people of small stature and build, such as children? One New Zealand teacher tried to fit as many children as possible in one square meter. As a result, it turned out to accommodate 22 children.
1 sq. m.
We can say that on average 10 people can fit in one square meter (assuming the ratio of adults and children is 1 to 10). The average weight of an adult is 62 kg.
100 sq. m
The football field will fit approximately 71,000 people, which is more than the population of Greenland (about 60,000).
1 sq. km.
A square kilometer could accommodate 10 million people, which is roughly equal to the population of a metropolis, and all 26 million Scandinavians from Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark would fit in one square mile (2.5 sq. Km).
central park
Central Park with an area of 3.41 sq. km could easily accommodate the population of Australia, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Peru, Venezuela, Malaysia, Nepal or Mozambique. According to scientists, the population of the Earth in 5000 BC. ranged from 5 to 20 million people. All this population could fill a little more than half of Central Park.
But still, how big is a piece of land needed to fit all 7.6 billion people? Answer: the area is 27 km x 27 km. Such a square would be smaller than the area of Bahrain.
World population in one house
How big does a building need to be to accommodate all the inhabitants of the Earth?
7.6 billion- that's a lot, a lot. If each person represented one grain of rice, then rice could fill a cube with a side of 6.1 meters - about the size of a two-story house.
And if we imagine that one person is equal to one grain of sand, then 7.6 grains of sand would fill a room in the form of a cube with a side of 4 meters.
Considering that 10 people are placed on an area of 1 sq. m, as well as their average height is 165 cm, then you can build a "telephone" booth of the required size. This will give us a 3D model, which will then allow us to better measure the number of people that could fit in a given room.
So, we get 165 m / person, or 6.06 people per cubic meter.
* The volume of the Empire State Building is 1.05 million cubic meters. This means that the building can accommodate 6.3 million people. But it cannot accommodate all people.
To fit all the people in one house, in the form of a cube, you need a room with a volume of more than 1.2 billion cubic meters. Such a building should have a side equal to 1.07 km. This means that it is twice the size of a Boeing factory and almost 30% taller than the Burj Khalifa.
Here's what it would look like if built in Manhattan:
It will also be interesting to note that the average person's 7.6 billion steps are enough to circumnavigate the globe 150 times. If you take two steps in a second, then it will take 115 years to go around the Earth 150 times.
And what if all people stand on each other's shoulders?
The average height of a person is 165 cm, and if we consider that everyone will stand on each other's shoulders, then the average height of a tower of people will increase by about 134 cm.
When the tower reaches the moon, it consists of 286,000,000 people, which is approximately equal to 5% of the total population of the Earth.
When the last person involved in the construction of a human tower stands on the shoulders of a neighbor, we get an altitude of 9,800,000 km, which is approximately equal to 1/4 of the distance to Venus, 1/5 of the distance to Mars and 1/15 of the distance to the Sun.
What if all the people joined hands and lined up in a circle?
If we assume that the length of the chain increases by 91 cm each time a new member is added to it, then after adding all the people, we get a ring with a diameter of 2,100,000 km and a circumference of 6,600,000 km.
Population of the Earth
And if you take into account all the people who have ever lived on Earth?
Scientists believe that in the entire history of the Earth, the planet was inhabited by about 108,000,000,000 people. All of them could fit in an area equal to Qatar or Jamaica.
Iceland or Cuba could hold 1,000,000,000,000 people.
In order for people to cover the entire land of the Earth, their number should be equal to 1,480,000,000,000,000 (one quadrillion 480 trillion), which is about 200,000 times the population of the Earth today.
And if it were possible to cover the entire area of the Earth, taking into account the seas, rivers and oceans, then the number of people should be approximately 5,000,000,000,000,000 people (one quintillion).
high population density
The whole of humanity is the size of a sugar cube?
Atoms have a lot of empty space, and if you remove it, then the entire human race would fit in a sugar cube.
The atoms that make up people are 99.9999999999999% empty space. Purely theoretically, if you could remove all this emptiness, then all of humanity could fit in one sugar cube.
All the people of the Earth are compressed, as in the Moscow metro
If it were possible to collect the entire population of our planet (all 7.6 billion) in one place and compress it in the same way as people are compressed during rush hour in the Moscow metro (that is, approximately 7.7 people / sq. M), then all these people would easily fit within the Moscow Ring Road.
In the spring of this year, American demographers calculated the growth rate of the earth's population, starting with the first representative of Homo sapiens. The figure turned out to be impressive: 108 billion.
Journalist and director Paul Ratner shot a short video about the study and described its results in a portal "Big Think ".
Many take it for granted that we live in a unique time - at the cutting edge of history. But one has only to think how many people have already lived on the planet, and there is no trace of our arrogance. And the main question is not even how many people lived, but how many died.
As of 2015, demographers from the Population Data Bureau, a Washington-based NGO, estimate the total human population of the earth at 108.2 billion. If we subtract the roughly 7.4 billion who trample the planet today, we get 100.8 billion earthlings who died before us.
So, the dead are almost 14 times more than the living! It would be an impressive army of zombies, ghosts or White Walkers from the Game of Thrones. If you consider yourself an optimist, then you can consider that your contemporaries are about 6.8% of all who have ever lived in the world. For the sake of simplicity (and to account for people born in the last year), let's round the figure up to 7%. We are 7%. Let's not lose face!
How did scientists get this result? There is a demographic report on the Washington Bureau website. It says that the starting point was the fifty-thousandth year before the birth of Christ. It is then that modern Homo sapiens are believed to have appeared. The dating can be disputed: early hominins walked the Earth already millions of years ago. But 50,000 BC is the date the United Nations uses to calculate population trends.
Of course, no one knows exactly how many people have been born since then. The estimate is based on "informed speculation". Experts take into account many factors, such as high mortality in the early stages of the evolution of our species (during the Iron Age, the average life expectancy was 10 years), the lack of medicines and food, climate change, and much more. When all this is taken into account, it is not surprising that the population of the planet has grown so slowly. In our ancestors, infant mortality could reach 500 cases per 1000 births.
The organization's specialists have collected all their data on population growth rates in one table.
Population growth rate from 50,000 BC to 2011; also shows the number of births per thousand people and the total number of births between each two marks
Interestingly, the rate of growth slows down between the beginning of our era and 1650. In the Middle Ages, a plague epidemic raged in Europe - the Black Death. Also noticeable is the population explosion after the industrial revolution. For a century and a half since 1850, the world's population has increased by about 6 times!
The population of the globe is the total number of people living on Earth and continuously renewing their numbers through the process of reproduction. Today, the planet is inhabited by more than seven billion people.
According to the calculations of a statistician from the Netherlands (Center for Informatics and Mathematics), Peter Grunwald, during the course of the entire history of human development, equal to more than 162 thousand years, more than one hundred and seven and a half billion people were born on Earth. Based on his calculations, it can be assumed that approximately 6% of all people living on the planet before our time are equal to 6.7 billion people living today (2008 data). Grunwald also admits that in the 107.5 billion people born in all time on Earth, one cannot be completely sure, since practically nothing is known about the population and the percentage of births in antiquity. At the same time, the researcher considers it incorrect that some scientists claim that more people live on Earth at the present time than during the entire period of the formation of human history.
Based on estimates of the earth's agro-natural potential, the planet is able to feed more than 80 billion people, and historically the population could not exceed 100 million people. Before the Neolithic Revolution took place, the Earth could not support more than 3 million people. The UN has set an approximate population limit of 8 billion, at the moment of reaching which, the population of each country will begin to promote the maximum possible birth control, as well as fertility equal to two births per healthy woman.
Demographic projections
The most accurate forecast regarding the population was made by D. Huxley, a biologist from England. Based on his calculations, in 1964 he made a conclusion that states that the world's population will reach 6 billion by the year 2000. The UN Foundation announced that by 1999 the number of people living on Earth had reached 6 billion, and in 2011 - seven billion. The UN predicts a significant population decline from 2015 to 2050 for such countries: Russia, Germany, China, Poland, Romania, Thailand, Ukraine, Serbia, Japan, as well as for the countries of Western, Southeast and East Asia.
General growth trend
In the works of many scientists (H. Foerster, A.V. Korotaev, S.P. Kapitsa, M. Kremer) it is said that the increase in the earth's population over the past six thousand years followed the law of hyperbole, that is, the entire increase in human numbers was equal to proportional to its square. But, judging by the historical chronicle, the population of the planet throughout its history not only increased dramatically, but also became smaller, which was facilitated by destructive wars, long-term conflicts, the latest developments in technology and their development. For example, the population of the Middle East over the past 4,000 years has grown at a slow pace (slower than ten times, in general, on the planet).
By the beginning of the 1960s, the main rate of human growth began to slow down gradually, and another type of population increase appeared instead, the logistical one. The rate of natural increase in the number of people inhabiting the world, since 1989, began to decline, which is a consequence of a sharp jump in demographics.
The dynamics of the growth of the population of the entire globe in billions of people from 1000 to the 2000s of our era
At the beginning of our era, there were already 300 million people on the planet, by the end of the first millennium - 400 million, 500 million - 1500, one billion - 1820, 1.6 billion - 1900, three billion - 1960, 5.65 billion - 1993 . At the end of October 1999, the number of people inhabiting the globe reached 6 billion people, 6.3 - in 2003, 6.5 - in 2006, 6.8 - in 2010, at the beginning of November 2011 - 7 billion. In 2015, the population of the earth should be more than 7 billion people.
According to the UN forecast, the world population will be 8.1 billion by 2025, 9 billion by 2050, and 10 billion by 2100.
Until the seventies, the number of people inhabiting the Earth grew, according to the law of hyperbole, today the growth rate has noticeably decreased. According to demographic studies, the population is still growing rapidly, despite the fact that its growth has already become half as much as in 1963 (at which time the peak value of growth was reached).
Over the past 11 years (from 1994 to 2015), the number of elderly people has doubled, worldwide there are significantly more of them than children under the age of 5 (according to the latest data provided by the UN).
For the first time, during the formation of all human history, the number of people living in the city became equal to the number living in villages and villages, which amounted to 3.4 billion. It is also predicted that the largest part of the population living on the globe will be city dwellers, which is confirmed by the latest data.
By 2050, more of the world's population will live in Asia, ¼ in Africa, 8.2% in Latin America, 7.4% in Europe, 4.7% in North America.
The largest state in terms of population is China, but, guided by UN forecasts, India will also reach overpopulation by 2025. Until the beginning of 1991, the USSR occupied the third place in terms of population, after it collapsed, this place was taken by the United States (at the end of 2006, the population was equal to 300 million people), the fourth place was occupied by Indonesia, the fifth by Brazil, the sixth by Pakistan, seventh - Bangladesh, eighth - Nigeria, ninth - Russia.
According to CIA estimates, in mid-summer 2013, the number of people inhabiting the planet was 7,095,217,980.
The population of planet Earth in 2015
At the beginning of 2014, the UN Commission made a statement, which stated that the earth's population would reach 7.2 billion people, and in 2015 the population of the earth is planned to be about 7.3 - 7.4 billion people.
Population of the countries of the world and Russia in 2015
№ | The country | population | % of total population |
1 | PRC | 1 369 723 215 | 19,013% |
2 | India | 1 263 419 215 | 17,537% |
3 | USA | 319 078 215 | 4,429% |
4 | Indonesia | 253 276 460 | 3,516% |
5 | Brazil | 203 724 463 | 2,828% |
6 | Pakistan | 188 546 242 | 2,617% |
7 | Nigeria | 178 981 119 | 2,484% |
8 | Bangladesh | 157 967 552 | 2,193% |
9 | Russia | 146 497 215 | 2,033% |
10 | Japan | 127 304 215 | 1,767% |
11 | Mexico | 119 977 418 | 1,665% |
12 | Philippines | 100 481 263 | 1,395% |
13 | Vietnam | 89 973 115 | 1,249% |
14 | Ethiopia | 88 217 206 | 1,225% |
15 | Egypt | 87 528 932 | 1,215% |
16 | Germany | 81 044 215 | 1,125% |
17 | Iran | 77 813 220 | 1,080% |
18 | Turkey | 76 932 079 | 1,068% |
19 | DR Congo | 69 624 333 | 0,966% |
20 | Thailand | 65 135 215 | 0,904% |
21 | United Kingdom | 64 572 476 | 0,896% |
22 | France | 64 192 823 | 0,891% |
23 | Italy | 61 046 883 | 0,847% |
24 | South Africa | 54 266 215 | 0,753% |
25 | Myanmar | 53 983 173 | 0,749% |
26 | The Republic of Korea | 50 268 656 | 0,698% |
27 | Colombia | 48 104 215 | 0,668% |
28 | Tanzania | 47 686 001 | 0,662% |
29 | Spain | 46 771 975 | 0,649% |
30 | Kenya | 45 810 195 | 0,636% |
31 | Ukraine | 43 068 274 | 0,598% |
32 | Argentina | 42 933 715 | 0,596% |
33 | Algeria | 40 193 162 | 0,558% |
34 | Uganda | 39 108 839 | 0,543% |
35 | Sudan | 39 028 305 | 0,542% |
36 | Poland | 38 759 874 | 0,538% |
37 | Iraq | 35 032 976 | 0,486% |
38 | Canada | 34 525 215 | 0,479% |
39 | Morocco | 33 674 215 | 0,467% |
40 | Afghanistan | 31 544 733 | 0,438% |
41 | Uzbekistan | 30 752 815 | 0,427% |
42 | Peru | 30 739 359 | 0,427% |
43 | Venezuela | 30 591 215 | 0,425% |
44 | Malaysia | 29 841 390 | 0,414% |
45 | Saudi Arabia | 29 633 643 | 0,411% |
46 | Nepal | 28 384 955 | 0,394% |
47 | Mozambique | 26 737 192 | 0,371% |
48 | Ghana | 26 706 393 | 0,371% |
49 | North Korea | 25 290 803 | 0,351% |
50 | Yemen | 25 232 723 | 0,350% |
51 | Australia | 24 525 215 | 0,340% |
52 | Madagascar | 23 836 177 | 0,331% |
53 | Republic of China | 23 674 495 | 0,329% |
54 | Cameroon | 22 982 847 | 0,319% |
55 | Angola | 22 301 476 | 0,310% |
56 | Syria | 22 150 830 | 0,307% |
57 | Sri Lanka | 21 609 990 | 0,300% |
58 | Ivory Coast | 20 968 989 | 0,291% |
59 | Romania | 20 106 857 | 0,279% |
60 | Niger | 18 699 017 | 0,260% |
61 | Chile | 17 987 215 | 0,250% |
62 | Burkina Faso | 17 583 830 | 0,244% |
63 | Kazakhstan | 17 494 709 | 0,243% |
64 | Netherlands | 17 076 890 | 0,237% |
65 | Malawi | 16 993 359 | 0,236% |
66 | Guatemala | 16 023 929 | 0,222% |
67 | Mali | 15 932 442 | 0,221% |
68 | Cambodia | 15 572 485 | 0,216% |
69 | Ecuador | 15 245 215 | 0,212% |
70 | Zambia | 15 185 217 | 0,211% |
71 | Zimbabwe | 14 763 540 | 0,205% |
72 | Senegal | 14 712 386 | 0,2042% |
73 | Chad | 13 375 361 | 0,1857% |
74 | Guinea | 12 208 113 | 0,1695% |
75 | South Sudan | 11 902 933 | 0,1652% |
76 | Cuba | 11 422 812 | 0,1586% |
77 | Belgium | 11 368 207 | 0,1578% |
78 | Greece | 11 156 804 | 0,1549% |
79 | Tunisia | 11 050 715 | 0,1534% |
80 | Bolivia | 11 011 879 | 0,1529% |
81 | Somalia | 10 969 866 | 0,1523% |
82 | Benin | 10 763 725 | 0,1494% |
83 | Rwanda | 10 701 437 | 0,1485% |
84 | Dominican Republic | 10 693 169 | 0,1484% |
85 | Czech Republic | 10 676 634 | 0,1482% |
86 | Burundi | 10 586 967 | 0,1470% |
87 | Haiti | 10 565 624 | 0,1467% |
88 | Portugal | 10 531 516 | 0,1462% |
89 | Hungary | 9 983 215 | 0,1386% |
90 | Sweden | 9 749 079 | 0,1353% |
91 | Azerbaijan | 9 581 315 | 0,1330% |
92 | Belarus | 9 579 315 | 0,1330% |
93 | Serbia | 9 572 593 | 0,1329% |
94 | Austria | 8 612 001 | 0,1195% |
95 | Tajikistan | 8 309 615 | 0,1153% |
96 | Switzerland | 8 240 904 | 0,1144% |
97 | Israel | 8 236 215 | 0,1143% |
98 | Papua New Guinea | 7 580 323 | 0,1052% |
99 | Honduras | 7 522 215 | 0,1044% |
100 | Bulgaria | 7 301 892 | 0,1014% |
101 | Hong Kong (PRC) | 7 192 515 | 0,0998% |
102 | Paraguay | 6 728 846 | 0,0934% |
103 | Jordan | 6 699 315 | 0,0930% |
104 | Eritrea | 6 592 391 | 0,0915% |
105 | Salvador | 6 439 967 | 0,0894% |
106 | Laos | 6 405 015 | 0,0889% |
107 | Libya | 6 309 667 | 0,0876% |
108 | Sierra Leone | 6 261 597 | 0,0869% |
109 | Togo | 6 247 370 | 0,0867% |
110 | Nicaragua | 6 127 260 | 0,0850% |
111 | Kyrgyzstan | 5 919 315 | 0,0822% |
112 | Denmark | 5 683 450 | 0,0789% |
113 | Finland | 5 528 715 | 0,0767% |
114 | Slovakia | 5 468 223 | 0,0759% |
115 | Singapore | 5 368 615 | 0,0745% |
116 | Turkmenistan | 5 363 386 | 0,0744% |
117 | Norway | 5 222 115 | 0,0725% |
118 | Lebanon | 5 022 129 | 0,0697% |
119 | UAE | 4 856 465 | 0,0674% |
120 | CAR | 4 765 418 | 0,0661% |
121 | Ireland | 4 660 244 | 0,0647% |
122 | Republic of the Congo | 4 581 809 | 0,0636% |
123 | New Zealand | 4 562 615 | 0,0633% |
124 | Georgia | 4 513 715 | 0,0627% |
125 | State of Palestine | 4 443 764 | 0,0617% |
126 | Costa Rica | 4 324 927 | 0,0600% |
127 | Croatia | 4 269 915 | 0,0593% |
128 | Liberia | 4 213 215 | 0,0585% |
129 | Mauritania | 3 913 215 | 0,0543% |
130 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3 859 592 | 0,0536% |
131 | Puerto Rico (USA) | 3 749 004 | 0,0520% |
132 | Moldova | 3 580 815 | 0,0497% |
133 | Kuwait | 3 502 586 | 0,0486% |
134 | Panama | 3 429 028 | 0,0476% |
135 | Uruguay | 3 227 007 | 0,0448% |
136 | Armenia | 3 128 764 | 0,0434% |
137 | Lithuania | 2 954 075 | 0,0410% |
138 | Albania | 2 854 956 | 0,0396% |
139 | Oman | 2 796 694 | 0,0388% |
140 | Mongolia | 2 760 015 | 0,0383% |
141 | Jamaica | 2 729 015 | 0,0379% |
142 | Namibia | 2 371 203 | 0,0329% |
143 | Lesotho | 2 120 726 | 0,0294% |
144 | Slovenia | 2 098 085 | 0,0291% |
145 | Macedonia | 2 088 984 | 0,0290% |
146 | Botswana | 2 061 802 | 0,0286% |
147 | Latvia | 2 013 515 | 0,0279% |
148 | Gambia | 1 932 169 | 0,0268% |
149 | Guinea-Bissau | 1 769 013 | 0,0246% |
150 | Gabon | 1 720 509 | 0,0239% |
151 | Qatar | 1 708 650 | 0,0237% |
152 | Trinidad and Tobago | 1 326 929 | 0,01842% |
153 | Estonia | 1 318 034 | 0,01830% |
154 | Mauritius | 1 298 004 | 0,01802% |
155 | Swaziland | 1 269 919 | 0,01763% |
156 | Bahrain | 1 236 786 | 0,01717% |
157 | East Timor | 1 068 624 | 0,01483% |
158 | Fiji | 889 242 | 0,01234% |
159 | Djibouti | 888 528 | 0,01233% |
160 | Cyprus | 860 215 | 0,01194% |
161 | Reunion (France) | 830 796 | 0,01153% |
162 | Equatorial Guinea | 780 276 | 0,01083% |
163 | Butane | 767 767 | 0,01066% |
164 | Comoros | 753 653 | 0,01046% |
165 | Guyana | 736 769 | 0,01023% |
166 | Montenegro | 625 550 | 0,008683% |
167 | Macau (PRC) | 608 715 | 0,008449% |
168 | SADR | 586 861 | 0,008146% |
169 | Solomon islands | 574 080 | 0,007969% |
170 | Luxembourg | 550 895 | 0,007647% |
171 | Suriname | 545 140 | 0,007567% |
172 | Cape Verde | 504 852 | 0,007008% |
173 | Malta | 426 599 | 0,005921% |
174 | Brunei | 424 420 | 0,005891% |
175 | Guadeloupe (France) | 405 850 | 0,005633% |
176 | Martinique (France) | 393 506 | 0,005462% |
177 | Bahamas | 383 786 | 0,005327% |
178 | Maldives | 352 787 | 0,004897% |
179 | Iceland | 326 886 | 0,004537% |
180 | Belize | 323 668 | 0,004493% |
181 | Barbados | 287 281 | 0,003988% |
182 | French Polynesia (France) | 281 050 | 0,003901% |
183 | New Caledonia (France) | 261 039 | 0,003623% |
184 | Vanuatu | 259 516 | 0,003602% |
185 | Guiana (France) | 238 764 | 0,003314% |
186 | Mayotte (France) | 229 285 | 0,003183% |
187 | Sao Tome and Principe | 199 097 | 0,002764% |
188 | Samoa | 193 046 | 0,002680% |
189 | Saint Lucia | 184 813 | 0,002565% |
190 | Guam (USA) | 168 761 | 0,002343% |
191 | Curaçao (Nida) | 150 894 | 0,002094% |
192 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 110 586 | 0,001535% |
193 | Virgin Islands (US) | 108 007 | 0,001499% |
194 | Grenada | 107 518 | 0,001492% |
195 | Tonga | 106 997 | 0,001485% |
196 | Kiribati | 104 657 | 0,001453% |
197 | micronesia | 104 618 | 0,001452% |
198 | Aruba (Nid.) | 104 146 | 0,001446% |
199 | Jersey (UK) | 98 572 | 0,001368% |
200 | Seychelles | 94 021 | 0,001305% |
201 | Antigua and Barbuda | 91 618 | 0,001272% |
202 | Isle of Man (UK) | 87 190 | 0,001210% |
203 | Andorra | 76 813 | 0,001066% |
204 | Dominica | 73 056 | 0,001014% |
205 | Bermuda (UK) | 66 176 | 0,000919% |
206 | Guernsey (UK) | 63 800 | 0,000886% |
207 | Cayman Islands (UK) | 59 941 | 0,000832% |
208 | Greenland (Denmark) | 57 679 | 0,000801% |
209 | American Samoa (USA) | 55 835 | 0,000775% |
210 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 55 304 | 0,000768% |
211 | Northern Mariana Islands (USA) | 55 046 | 0,000764% |
212 | Marshall Islands | 53 287 | 0,000740% |
213 | Faroe Islands (Denmark) | 48 674 | 0,000676% |
214 | Monaco | 38 581 | 0,000536% |
215 | Sint Maarten (Nid.) | 37 944 | 0,000527% |
216 | Liechtenstein | 37 644 | 0,000523% |
217 | Saint Martin (France) | 36 801 | 0,000511% |
218 | Turks and Caicos (UK) | 34 251 | 0,000475% |
219 | San Marino | 32 152 | 0,000446% |
220 | Gibraltar (UK) | 30 516 | 0,000424% |
221 | Virgin Islands (Brit.) | 29 077 | 0,000404% |
222 | Aland Islands (Finland) | 28 717 | 0,000399% |
223 | Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba (Nid.) | 23 511 | 0,000326% |
224 | Palau | 21 312 | 0,000296% |
225 | Cook Islands (New Zealand) | 20 947 | 0,000291% |
226 | Anguilla (UK) | 14 675 | 0,000204% |
227 | Wallis and Futuna (France) | 13 421 | 0,000186% |
228 | Nauru | 10 296 | 0,000143% |
229 | Tuvalu | 9 989 | 0,000139% |
230 | Saint Barthelemy (France) | 9 130 | 0,000127% |
231 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon (France) | 6 175 | 0,0000857% |
232 | Montserrat (UK) | 5 230 | 0,0000726% |
233 | Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha | 4 155 | 0,0000577% |
234 | Falkland Islands (UK) | 3 087 | 0,0000428% |
235 | Svalbard (Norway) | 2 690 | 0,0000373% |
236 | Norfolk Island (Australia) | 2 337 | 0,0000324% |
237 | Christmas Island (Australia) | 2 087 | 0,0000290% |
238 | Tokelau (New Zealand) | 1 426 | 0,0000198% |
239 | Niue (New Zealand) | 1 317 | 0,0000183% |
240 | Vatican | 803 | 0,0000111% |
241 | Cocos Islands (Australia) | 560 | 0,0000078% |
242 | Pitcairn Islands (UK) | 60 | 0,00000083% |
"The population of the world ... What associations do everyone who hears this phrase have?" asks author Irene N. in her article. Further, she claims that every 0.24 seconds another baby is born on our planet, and in an hour the world's population is replenished by more than 15 thousand newborns. And almost every minute (0.56 seconds) a person dies, and our world loses almost 6.5 thousand people per hour.
On this topic, I found it interesting that Ph.D. Monty White, who claims that the population of the Earth increased to seven billion during exactly the period indicated in the Bible. However, read below.
Everything is very simple - ordinary arithmetic speaks of the absolute mathematical reasonableness of the young age of the earth.
Creationists are often asked, "How could the earth's population reach 6.5 billion people if the earth is only about 6,000 years old, and if only two people lived on it at the very beginning?" Let's see what simple arithmetic tells us.
One plus one equals billions
Let's start from the beginning - with one man and one woman. Now suppose they get married and have kids, and then their kids get married and have kids too. Let's also assume that the population doubles every 150 years. Therefore, in 150 years, four people will live on earth, in another 150 years, eight people, and in another 150 years, sixteen people, and so on. It should be noted that this rate of population growth is actually very conservative. In fact, even accounting for disease, famine, and natural disasters, the population has recently doubled approximately every 40 years.1
After 32 times the population doubling, which is only 4800 years, the world population would reach almost 8.6 billion people. This is 2 billion more people than lives on earth today, namely 6.5 billion people. This figure was recorded on March 1, 2006 by the US Census Bureau.2 This simple calculation shows that if you start with Adam and Eve and take into account the standard population growth rate that we just noted above, then the modern population figure could perfectly be achieved for 6000 years.
Influence of the Flood
However, we know from the Bible that around 2500 BC (4,500 years ago) the global Flood reduced the number of people on earth to eight people.3 But if we assume that the population doubles every 150 years, we again see that if start counting with Noah's family in 2500 BC, 4500 years would be more than enough for the current population to reach 6.5 billion.
From two people who were created 6,000 years ago, and then from eight people who were on board Noah's Ark about 4,500 years ago, the world's population could easily have grown to the figure we celebrate today - more than 6.5 billion people.
Evolutionists always tell us that humans have been on earth for hundreds of thousands of years. However, if we assume that people have existed for about 50,000 years and use the above calculation method, the result would be that the population doubled 332 times, and the number of people on earth would be simply enormous - a number followed by one hundred zeros 100 ; i.e:
10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000.
This number is actually simply impossible to imagine, since it is billions of times greater than the number of atoms in the entire universe! Such a calculation shows how meaningless is the statement that people have existed on earth for tens of thousands of years.
Everything is very simple - ordinary arithmetic speaks of the absolute mathematical reasonableness of the young age of the earth. From two people who were created 6,000 years ago, and then from eight people who were on board Noah's Ark about 4,500 years ago, the world's population could easily have grown to the figure we celebrate today - more than 6.5 billion people.
Based on the data set out in the UN projections for the population of the world
Around 8000 BC, the world's population was approximately 5 million people. For the 8000-year period up to 1 AD. it has grown to 200 million people (300 million or even 600 million according to some estimates), with a growth rate of 0.05% per year. A huge change in population occurred with the advent of the industrial revolution:
- In 1800, the world population reached one billion.
- The second billion in population was reached in just 130 years in 1930.
- The third billion was reached in less than 30 years in 1959.
- Over the next 15 years, the fourth billion will be reached in 1974.
- In just 13 years, in 1987 - the fifth billion.
During the 20th century alone, the world's population grew from 1.65 billion to 6 billion.
In 1970, the population was half what it is now. Due to declining population growth, it would take more than 200 years to double the population from today's data.
Table with population data by years and dynamics of population growth in the world by years until 2017
Pop% | World population | Growth in % compared to the previous year | Absolute annual increase number of people | Average age of the population | Population density: number of people per 1 sq. km. | Urbanization (urban population) in % of the total population | Urban population |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 7 515 284 153 | 1,11% | 82 620 878 | 29,9 | 58 | 54,7% | 4 110 778 369 |
2016 | 7 432 663 275 | 1,13% | 83 191 176 | 29,9 | 57 | 54,3% | 4 034 193 153 |
2015 | 7 349 472 099 | 1,18% | 83 949 411 | 30 | 57 | 53,8% | 3 957 285 013 |
2010 | 6 929 725 043 | 1,23% | 82 017 839 | 29 | 53 | 51,5% | 3 571 272 167 |
2005 | 6 519 635 850 | 1,25% | 78 602 746 | 27 | 50 | 49,1% | 3 199 013 076 |
2000 | 6 126 622 121 | 1,33% | 78 299 807 | 26 | 47 | 46,6% | 2 856 131 072 |
1995 | 5 735 123 084 | 1,55% | 85 091 077 | 25 | 44 | 44,8% | 2 568 062 984 |
1990 | 5 309 667 699 | 1,82% | 91 425 426 | 24 | 41 | 43% | 2 285 030 904 |
1985 | 4 852 540 569 | 1,79% | 82 581 621 | 23 | 37 | 41,3% | 2 003 049 795 |
1980 | 4 439 632 465 | 1,8% | 75 646 647 | 23 | 34 | 39,4% | 1 749 539 272 |
1975 | 4 061 399 228 | 1,98% | 75 782 307 | 22 | 31 | 37,8% | 1 534 721 238 |
1970 | 3 682 487 691 | 2,08% | 71 998 514 | 22 | 28 | 36,7% | 1 350 280 789 |
1965 | 3 322 495 121 | 1,94% | 60 830 259 | 23 | 21 | There is no data | There is no data |
1960 | 3 018 343 828 | 1,82% | 52 005 861 | 23 | 23 | 33,8% | 1 019 494 911 |
1955 | 2 758 314 525 | 1,78% | 46 633 043 | 23 | 21 | There is no data | There is no data |
The world population is currently (2017) growing at a rate of about 1.11% per year (up from 1.13% in 2016).
Currently, the average population growth per year is estimated at about 80 million people. The annual growth rate peaked in the late 1960s at 2% or more. The population growth rate peaked at 2.19 percent per year in 1963.
The annual growth rate is currently declining and is projected to continue declining in the coming years. Population growth is projected to be less than 1% per year by 2020 and less than 0.5% per year by 2050. This means that the world population will continue to grow in the 21st century, but at a slower pace than in the recent past.
The world population doubled (100% increase) within 40 years from 1959 (3 billion) to 1999 (6 billion). It is currently predicted that in 39 years the world's population will increase by another 50%, to 9 billion by 2038.
Forecast of the population of the Earth (all countries of the world) and demographic data for the period up to 2050:
the date | Population | Number growth a % for 1 year | Absolute growth for 1 year in the number of people | The average age of the world's population | Population density: number of people per 1 sq. km. | Percentage of urbanization | Total urban population |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | 7 758 156 792 | 1,09% | 81 736 939 | 31 | 60 | 55,9% | 4 338 014 924 |
2025 | 8 141 661 007 | 0,97% | 76 700 843 | 32 | 63 | 57,8% | 4 705 773 576 |
2030 | 8 500 766 052 | 0,87% | 71 821 009 | 33 | 65 | 59,5% | 5 058 158 460 |
2035 | 8 838 907 877 | 0,78% | 67 628 365 | 34 | 68 | 61% | 5 394 234 712 |
2040 | 9 157 233 976 | 0,71% | 63 665 220 | 35 | 70 | 62,4% | 5 715 413 029 |
2045 | 9 453 891 780 | 0,64% | 59 331 561 | 35 | 73 | 63,8% | 6 030 924 065 |
2050 | 9 725 147 994 | 0,57% | 54 251 243 | 36 | 75 | 65,2% | 6 338 611 492 |
The main stages of the growth of the world's population
10 billion (2056)
The United Nations projects a world population of 10 billion by 2056.
8 billion (2023)
The world population is expected to reach 8 billion in 2023 according to the United Nations (and in 2026 according to the US Census Bureau).
7.5 billion (2017)
The current world population is 7.5 billion as of January 2017, according to United Nations estimates.
7 billion (2011)
According to the United Nations, the world's population reached 7 billion on October 31, 2011. The US Census Bureau made a lower estimate - 7 billion was reached on March 12, 2012.
6 billion (1999)
According to the United Nations, on October 12, 1999, the world population was 6 billion. According to the US Census Bureau, this value was reached on July 22, 1999, at approximately 3:49 am GMT.