Psychology and pedagogy of higher education. Actual problems of higher education pedagogy

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

State educational institution of higher professional education

"KAZAN STATE ENERGY UNIVERSITY"

HIGHER SCHOOL PEDAGOGY

Training and metodology complex

Kazan 2011

LECTURES

LECTURE 1

HIGHER SCHOOL PEDAGOGY: BASIC CONCEPTS AND HISTORY OF FORMATION

learning goals

1. Have an idea about the essence and specifics of the pedagogy of higher education;

The allotted time is 2 hours.

Lecture plan

1. Object, subject of pedagogy, tasks and categorical apparatus of pedagogy. Communication of pedagogy with other sciences. Methodological foundations of pedagogy.

Pedagogy of higher education, its specifics and categories.

Modern educational paradigms.

Object, subject of pedagogy, tasks and categorical apparatus of pedagogy. Communication of pedagogy with other sciences. Methodological foundations of pedagogy

In the usual view, the term "pedagogy" has several meanings. They designate pedagogical science and pedagogical practice (equalizing it already with the art of interaction); define pedagogy as a system of activity that is projected in educational materials, methods and recommendations, or as a system of ideas about certain approaches to learning, methods and organizational forms (collaboration pedagogy, development pedagogy, etc.). Such a variety rather harms pedagogy, hinders a clear understanding and scientific presentation of the theoretical foundations and practical conclusions of science.

For science, there must be an immutable explicit and clear definition of the basic concepts, statements, object and subject. This allows not to be distracted and not to go sideways when explaining complex problems of science.

In the most general way sciencedefined as the sphere of human activity in which the development and theoretical systematization of objective knowledge about reality takes place.Activities in the field of science - scientific research. This is a special form of the process of cognition, such a systematic and directed study of objects, in which the means and methods of science are used and which ends with the formation of knowledge about the objects under study. The object of science is the area of ​​reality that this science explores; the subject of science is a way of seeing an object from the standpoint of this science(how the object is considered, what relations, aspects and functions inherent in it are highlighted).

It is important to emphasize that there is no generally accepted point of view on the object and subject of pedagogy. Pedagogy got its name from Greek words(paidos) - child and (ago) - lead. In literal translation (paydagos) - means schoolmaster. A teacher in Ancient Greece was a slave who literally took the child of his master by the hand and accompanied him to school. The teacher in this school was often another slave, only a scientist.

Gradually, the word (pedagogy) began to be used in a more general sense to denote the art of leading a child through life, i.e. educate him, train him, guide his spiritual and bodily development. Often, next to the names of people who later became famous, the names of the teachers who raised them are also called. Over time, the accumulation of knowledge led to the emergence of a special science of the upbringing and education of children. This understanding of pedagogy persisted until the middle of the 20th century. And only in recent decades, there has been an understanding that not only children, but also adults need qualified pedagogical guidance. That's why objectpedagogical science is human.In the world pedagogical lexicon, new concepts are increasingly used - "andragogy" or "andragogy" (from the Greek "andros" - a man and "ago" - to lead) and "anthropogogy" (Greek "anthropos" - a person and "ago" - lead).

Currently subjectPedagogy is a special, purposeful, socially and personally determined activity to introduce a person to the life of society.

Traditionally, it is referred to as upbringing. However, this term is ambiguous. At least four meanings are distinguished. Education is understood: in a broad social sense, when it comes to the impact on a person of all the surrounding reality; in a narrow social sense, when we mean purposeful activity covering the entire educational process; in a broad pedagogical sense, when education is understood as special educational work; in a narrow pedagogical sense, when we mean the solution of a specific educational task, for example, associated with the formation of moral qualities (moral education). In this case, it is always necessary to stipulate in what sense it is said about education.

The closest thing in meaning to the above designation of the very special type of activity that pedagogical science studies is socialization , which is understood as the process of inclusion of a growing person in society due to the assimilation and reproduction by the individual of social experience, historically accumulated culture. However, the meaning of this term goes beyond the scope of proper pedagogical ideas. On the one hand, it belongs to a broader philosophical and sociological context, abstracting from the specific characteristics of pedagogical reality. On the other hand, it leaves in the shade the most important circumstance for the teacher that the essential aspect of the inclusion of a person in the life of society should be personalization , that is, the formation of personality. It is the personality that is able to show an independent attitude to life and creativity.

Closer to the reality under consideration is the concept of "education". This word means both a social phenomenon and a pedagogical process. In the law of the Russian Federation "On Education" it is defined as " purposeful process of education and training in the interests of the individual, society and the state.

Teachers who traditionally use the word “education” have difficulties in communicating with foreign colleagues, especially if the conversation is conducted in English. Namely, this language, as you know, serves in our time as a means of international communication. It is impossible to translate the word "education" into English in such a way that all the nuances mentioned above are preserved. Moreover, it should be noted that in the English-speaking tradition the term "pedagogy as a science" is practically not used; instead of it, “science (or sciences) about education” is used; in relation to the field of educational activity, there is the term “Art”.

The term "pedagogy" is adopted mainly in German-speaking, French-speaking, Scandinavian and Eastern European countries. In the 2nd half of the 20th century, the designation "science of education" penetrated into some countries where the term "pedagogy" has long come into use, however, the experience accumulated here in the theoretical development of educational problems in the categories of pedagogy is often not taken into account in the English-language scientific literature, the problems of correlation and the delimitation of the main pedagogical categories has been studied little. The International Encyclopaedia of Education (1994) does not have an article “Pedagogy”, just as there is no article “Education” (which quite eloquently indicates the difficulties of a holistic scientific characterization of these phenomena themselves). Only in the preface to the publication it is noted that in the Scandinavian countries and Germany the term "pedagogy" is used, which has a narrower meaning than English. "education", namely, relating primarily to schooling.

Thus, there is no final, generally accepted solution today. If all of the above is taken into account, then the most concise, general, and at the same time relatively precise definition contemporary Pedagogy is the science of education (training and upbringing) of a person.

Reflecting on the purpose of science, D.I. Mendeleev came to the conclusion that every scientific theory has two main and final goals - purpose and benefit.

Pedagogy is no exception to the general rule.

Pedagogical science performs the same functions as any other scientific discipline: description, explanation and prediction of the phenomena of the area of ​​reality that it studies.However, pedagogical science, the subject of which lies in the social and humanitarian sphere, has its own specifics. So, although the process of obtaining pedagogical knowledge is subject to general laws scientific knowledge and the introduction of accurate, rigorous research methods into this process is necessary, the nature and results of pedagogical research are largely determined by the influence of the attitudes of practical value consciousness. The prognostic function of pedagogical theory, unlike, for example, theory in physics, consists not only in foresight, but also in transformation. Pedagogical science cannot confine itself to an objective reflection of what is being studied, even if it is the most reliable one. It is required from it to influence the pedagogical reality, to improve it. Therefore, it combines two functions that in other scientific fields are usually divided between different disciplines:

- scientific and theoretical -reflection of pedagogical reality as it is, as a being (knowledge about the success and failure of teachers' work on new textbooks, about the difficulties that students experience when studying educational materials of a certain type, about the composition, functions and structure of the content of education, etc.);

- constructive and technical (normative, regulatory)- reflection of pedagogical reality as it should be (general principles of education and upbringing, pedagogical rules, guidelines etc.) .

It is necessary to distinguish between scientific and practical tasks of pedagogy. Practical work in this area is aimed at specific results of the activities of educating and educating people, and scientific work is aimed at obtaining knowledge about how this activity objectively proceeds and what needs to be done to make it more effective, as much as possible corresponding to the goals set.

In general, the tasks of pedagogy as a science can be represented as follows:

1. Opening patterns in the field of education and management of educational systems.Patterns in pedagogy are considered as connections between specially created or objectively existing conditions and the results achieved. The results are education, upbringing and personal development.

2. Study and generalization of practice, experience of pedagogical activity.This task presupposes, on the one hand, the theoretical substantiation and scientific interpretation of the advanced pedagogical experience, identifying in innovative author's approaches what can be transferred to mass pedagogical practice, and on the other hand, a thorough study of pedagogical errors and the causes of negative phenomena in the educational process.

. Development of new methods, means, forms, systems of training, education, management of educational structures.The solution to this problem is largely based on the study of new discoveries in related scientific fields (psychology, physiology, sociology, etc.), and is also determined by the understanding of the specifics of the modern social order in the field of education (for example, today school and university graduates are more required to have creative abilities and, consequently, pedagogical science is forced to more intensively develop ways to solve this problem).

. Forecasting education.Theoretical models of the proposed development of the educational infrastructure are necessary, first of all, for managing the policy and economics of education, and improving pedagogical activity.

. Implementation of research results into practice.One of the ways to solve this problem is scientific and practical centers, laboratories, associations. The effectiveness of solving this problem is largely achieved by involving teachers-practitioners in the preparation and conduct of research and the creation of a new pedagogical product (technology, methodology, methodological equipment, etc.)

.Development of theoretical, methodological foundations of innovative processes, rational connections between theory and practice, interpenetration of research and practical activities.

Much richer and more varied are those tasks that arise promptly, under the influence of the needs of practice and science itself. Many of them are not predictable, but require a quick solution.

Education studies not only pedagogy, but a number of other sciences: psychology (psychological aspects of education, the personality of the teacher, the personality of the pupil, etc.), sociology (the team and the individual, relationships in communities, etc.), philosophy, history, cultural studies , valeology and many others. Pedagogy is undoubtedly closely related to the results of research conducted in these sciences. In general, there are two types of connection between pedagogy and other sciences:

1. Methodological connection.

This type includes:

the use in pedagogy of fundamental ideas, general concepts that arise in other sciences (for example, from philosophy);

use of research methods used in other sciences (for example, from sociology).

2. subject connection.

This type of connection is characterized by:

using specific results of other sciences (for example, from psychology, medicine, physiology of higher nervous activity, etc.);

participation in complex research.

In principle, any scientific knowledge can be useful to pedagogy; it can interact with almost any scientific discipline. However, with two of them her relationship is special. It is philosophy and psychology.

The longest and most productive is connection of pedagogy with philosophy,performing a methodological function in pedagogy. The direction of pedagogical search and its results depend on the system of philosophical views of researchers (materialistic, idealistic, dialectical, pragmatic, existential, etc.). Philosophy develops a system of general principles and methods of scientific knowledge, is the theoretical basis for understanding the pedagogical field and creating pedagogical concepts. Pedagogical facts and phenomena cannot receive a scientific status without their philosophical substantiation. On the other hand, pedagogy is a "testing ground" for the application and testing of philosophical ideas. It develops ways and means of forming a person's worldview.

Undoubtedly the closest connection of pedagogy with psychology. However, it is necessary to realize very clearly that the subject of study of psychology as a science is the psyche and the psychological structure of the personality (the main components of which are consciousness, activity, self-consciousness), which means that it provides the starting data on which it is necessary to scientifically build the entire system of education and upbringing. And this is what pedagogy does.

Among the most important connections with psychology pedagogy refers to:

1. Age characteristics of groups of pupils and trainees.

Ideas about mental processes.

Interpretations of individual personality characteristics, first of all - independence, activity, motivation.

Presentation of the goal of education in a form that pedagogy can perceive in the form of content.

In its development, general pedagogy both integrates with other sciences (pedagogical psychology, pedagogical ethics, etc. have appeared), and differentiates itself - i.e. stands out in a number of relatively independent scientific sections, branches of pedagogy.

The separate independent branches of pedagogy that have developed to date form a system (interconnected set) of pedagogical disciplines that make up the unity, which is characterized by the term "pedagogy as a science". Common to all such disciplines is the subject of pedagogy, that is, education. Each of them specifically considers the side of education, highlighting its own subject. The classification of pedagogical disciplines can be carried out for various reasons.

1. The sciences of education, training and pedagogy itself.

General Pedagogyas a basic discipline that studies the basic patterns of education;

Didactics (learning theory), which gives a scientific justification for the learning process

theory of education,giving scientific substantiation of the process of education

Private methods(subject didactics) explore the specifics of the application of general patterns of learning to the teaching of individual subjects;

History of Pedagogy and Educationstudying the development of pedagogical ideas and educational practices in different historical eras;

Comparative Pedagogyexplores the patterns of functioning and development of educational and upbringing systems in different countries by comparing and finding similarities and differences.

Methodology of Pedagogy- the science of pedagogy itself, its status, development, conceptual composition, methods of obtaining new reliable scientific knowledge.

2. Branches of the application of pedagogical provisions to various stages of education, certain contingents of pupils and students, and to areas of activity.

Age Pedagogy- studying the features of training and education in different age periods (preschool, school pedagogy, adult pedagogy);

professional pedagogy,studying the theory and practice of vocational education (pedagogy of primary vocational education, pedagogy of secondary vocational education, pedagogy of higher education, industrial pedagogy)

Correctional (special) pedagogy- develop the theoretical foundations, principles, methods and forms and means of upbringing and education of children and adults with deviations in the physical and social development of deaf pedagogy (training and education of the deaf and hearing impaired), typhlopedagogy (training and education of the blind and visually impaired), oligophrenopedagogy (training and education of mentally retarded and children with mental retardation), speech therapy (training and education of children with speech disorders);

Branch Pedagogy(military, sports, criminological, etc.)

social pedagogy- science and practice of creating a system of educational activities to optimize the education of the individual, taking into account the specific conditions of the social environment.

Correctional labor pedagogycontains the theoretical justification and development of the practice of re-education of offenders of all ages.

The main pedagogical concepts expressing scientific generalizations are usually called pedagogical categories. These are the most general and capacious concepts that reflect the essence of science, its established and typical properties. In any science, categories play a leading role, they permeate all scientific knowledge and, as it were, link it into an integral system. For example, in physics it is mass, force, and in economics the main categories are money, cost, etc.

In pedagogy, there are many approaches to the definition of its conceptual and categorical apparatus. Nevertheless, with regard to pedagogy, it should be said that the personality, or rather, the processes that influence its formation, is at the center of all pedagogical knowledge. Thus, to major categoriespedagogy include: education, training, education, development, formation.

Education - this is a purposeful, systematic process of interrelated activities of a teacher and a student (teaching + learning), aimed at forming a system of knowledge, skills and abilities among students and developing their abilities.

Upbringing - the process of purposeful formation of personality in the conditions of a specially organized system that ensures the interaction of educators and educatees.

Development - process quantitative and qualitative changes in the inherited and acquired properties of a person.

Formation - the process and result of personality development under the influence of external and internal factors (upbringing, training, social and natural environment, personal activity of the individual, training, development, formation.

1. Philosophical categories reflect the most common features and connections, aspects and properties of reality, help to understand and display the patterns and trends in the development of pedagogy itself and that part of reality that it studies. It is impossible to talk about the object of pedagogy without using the word socialization, or - about the theory, dispensing with concepts: essence, phenomenon, general, singular, contradiction, cause, effect, possibility, reality, quality, quantity, being, consciousness, law, regularity, practiceand etc.

2. General scientific categories - common to many special sciences, but different from philosophical categories. It is hardly possible, when conducting pedagogical research, to do without such concepts as: system, structure, function, element, optimality, state, organization, formalization, model, hypothesis, leveland etc.

3. Private scientific - own concepts of pedagogy. These include: pedagogy, education, upbringing, learning, self-education, self-education, teaching, teaching, teaching method (education), educational material, learning situation, teacher, student, teacher, student, etc.

Comprehension of general scientific concepts in relation to pedagogical science leads to the enrichment of its own terminology with such combinations: pedagogical system, pedagogical activity, pedagogical reality, educational (pedagogical) process, pedagogical interaction.Let's give them a brief description.

Systemdefined as an integral complex of elements connected in such a way that with a change in one, others change.Pedagogical system - a set of interconnected structural components united by a single educational goal of personality development.

Activity,considering from philosophical positions, acts as a specifically human form of an active relationship to the surrounding world, the content of which is its expedient change and transformation.

Pedagogical activity - a set of activities that implement the function of introducing human beings to participate in the life of society.

Pedagogical reality - that part of reality taken for scientific consideration in the aspect of pedagogical activity.

Processdefined as change system states,Consequently, educational (pedagogical) process - change in the state of the education system as an activity.

Pedagogical interaction - the essential characteristic of the pedagogical process, which is a deliberate contact (long-term or temporary) between the teacher and the pupil, which results in mutual changes in behavior, activities and relationships.

4. Categories borrowed from related sciences: psychology - perception, understanding, mental development memorization, ability, skill, cybernetics - feedback, dynamic system.

Unlike sciences such as mathematics, physics or logic, pedagogy uses mostly common words. But, getting into the everyday life of science, the words of a natural language must acquire the inherent quality of a scientific term - unambiguity, which allows them to be understood by all scientists in this field.

Among the concepts that a teacher has to deal with, the concept of "methodology" appears as one of the most difficult and, therefore, often not in demand. The very word "methodology" is associated in the minds of many with something abstract, far from life, reduced to quotations from philosophical texts, ideological and administrative documents, weakly connected with pedagogy in general and the current needs of pedagogical theory and practice in particular.

However, overestimate the value methodology of pedagogy (however, like the methodology of any other science) is impossible. Without methodological knowledge, it is impossible to competently conduct pedagogical (any) research. Such literacy is provided by the mastery of a methodological culture, the content of which includes methodological reflection (the ability to analyze one’s own scientific activity), the ability to scientific justification, critical reflection and creative application of certain concepts, forms and methods of knowledge, management, design.

Back in the 19th century the researcher had to substantiate only the result obtained. He was required to show that this result was achieved in accordance with the rules accepted in this field of knowledge and that it fits into a wider system of knowledge. Currently, the study must be substantiated even before its implementation. It is necessary to indicate the starting points, the logic of the study, the intended result and the method for obtaining this result.

In order to determine the place of the methodology of pedagogy in common system methodological knowledge, it must be taken into account that its four levels are distinguished. The content of the higher - philosophical -level constitute the entire system of philosophical knowledge: categories, laws, patterns, approaches. So, for pedagogy, the philosophical law of the transition of quantitative changes into qualitative ones is manifested in the levels of development and education of a person.

Second level - general scientific methodology- represents theoretical provisions that can be applied to all or most scientific disciplines (system approach, activity approach, characteristics of different types of scientific research, their stages and elements: hypothesis, object and subject of research, goal, tasks, etc.) . Thus, a systematic approach in pedagogy provides for the need to consider objects and phenomena of pedagogical reality as complete systems having a certain structure and their own laws of functioning.

Third level - concrete scientific methodology- a set of methods, principles of research and procedures used in a particular scientific discipline.

Fourth level - technological methodology- make up the methodology and technique of research, i.e. a set of procedures that provide reliable empirical material and primary processing.

To date, after many years of discussions, discussions and specific research developments, the following definition of the methodology of pedagogy (the third level of methodology) has been formed: the methodology of pedagogy is a system of knowledge about the foundations and structure of pedagogical theory, about the principles of approach and obtaining knowledge that reflect pedagogical reality, as well as a system of activities to obtain such knowledge and substantiate programs, logic and methods, quality assessment research work. (V.V. Kraevsky, M.A. Danilov)

To the leading tasks of the methodology of pedagogy V.V. Kraevsky relates:

Definition and clarification of the subject of pedagogy and its place among other sciences.

Identification of the most important issues of pedagogical research.

Establishment of principles and methods of obtaining knowledge about pedagogical reality.

Determination of directions for the development of pedagogical theory.

Identification of ways of interaction between science and practice, the main ways of introducing the achievements of science into pedagogical practice.

Analysis of foreign pedagogical concepts.

Methodological culture is needed not only for a scientific worker. The mental act in the pedagogical process is aimed at solving the problems that arise in this process, and here one cannot do without reflection, i.e. thinking about your activities.

In order to more clearly imagine the meaning of the methodological basis of science, let us recall what kind of knowledge is scientific. F. Bacon once said that scientific knowledge is knowledge that goes back to the knowledge of causes. K. Jung spoke about this in a somewhat different interpretation when he considered the fact connected with the reaction of the layman and the scientist to an ordinary puddle. If the first is concerned only with how to get around it, then the second is interested in the question - why did it arise. A well-known philosopher and no less famous psychologist agree that scientific knowledge is knowledge that leads people to identify cause-and-effect relationships in the functioning of a particular phenomenon. Knowing them, people can identify the conditions under which these dependencies work. Reliable knowledge of such conditions and the corresponding cause-and-effect relationships is the methodological basis of science, including pedagogy.

The main features of the methodological culture of a practical worker in education (teacher, teacher, lecturer) are:

understanding of methodology as a system of principles and methods for constructing not only theoretical, but also practical (productive) activities;

mastering the principles of dialectical logic;

understanding the essence of pedagogy as a science of education and the main categories of pedagogy;

installation on the transformation of pedagogical theory into a method of cognitive activity;

mastering the principles of the unity of education and social policy, a systematic and holistic approach, expanding the total subject of education, the priority of developing and educational goals in a holistic pedagogical process.

the focus of the teacher's thinking on the genesis of pedagogical forms and methods;

the desire to reveal the unity and continuity of pedagogical knowledge in its historical development;

critical attitude to the arguments and provisions that lie in the plane of everyday pedagogical consciousness;

understanding of the ideological, humanistic functions of pedagogy;

design and construction of the educational process;

the ability and desire to use scientific pedagogical knowledge to analyze and improve their work;

awareness, formulation and creative solution of pedagogical problems;

reflection on their own cognitive and practical activities.

Thus, the possession of the methodology of pedagogy allows the teacher, the teacher to competently carry out the pedagogical process, to eliminate the method of "trial and error".

Modern educational paradigms

At present, in pedagogy, the term "paradigm" has received enough wide use, however, very different concepts are often put into its meaning. For example, there are calls for a transition to a “humanistic paradigm”, the paradigms of a technical society and Orthodox pedagogy are substantiated, and so on.

The term "paradigm" (from the Greek "sample") was introduced into the science of science by T. Kuhn in 1962. Paradigm - recognized by all scientific achievements, which for a certain time provide a model for posing problems and their solutions to the scientific community.The paradigm approach has been at the center of research by domestic and foreign science scholars for four decades: J. Agassi, I. Lakatos, J. Holton, P.P. Gaidenko, L.A. Markova and others.

Let us limit the classification of educational paradigms to two polar ones in terms of their characteristics:

1. Traditionalistic paradigm (or knowledge).

The main goal of training and education in the conditions of this paradigm is to give a person deep, strong versatile academic knowledge. The main source of knowledge is the educator (teacher). The learner is seen mainly as an object to be filled with knowledge. Personal aspects of learning are reduced to the formation of cognitive motivation and cognitive abilities. Therefore, the main attention is paid to the information support of the individual, not to its development, which is considered as a “by-product” of educational activity.

As a kind of knowledge can be distinguished technocratic paradigm (or pragmatic). Its main goal of training and education is to give a person the knowledge, skills and abilities that will be practically useful and necessary in life and professional activity, will help to interact correctly with modern technology. The main principle is polytechnics in teaching.

Thus, the knowledge and technocratic paradigms of education do not focus on the student's personality as a subject of the educational process. The student is only an object of pedagogical influence. It is planned to standardize the educational process, in which learning technologies are focused mainly on the capabilities of the average student. A direct (imperative) style of managing students' learning activities is used. Models of education built on the principles of these paradigms are characterized by monologized teaching, underestimation of the role of initiative and creativity of the subjects of the educational process. Both models are aimed at the formation of a personality with predetermined properties and the transfer of the content of teaching methods in finished form. At present, in Russian education, the outdated educational and disciplinary model is being replaced by a humanistic, personality-developing model, centered around the approach to students as full partners, in terms of cooperation and denying a manipulative approach to them.

. Person-oriented (humanistic or subject-subject) paradigm.

The main goal is to promote the development of a person's abilities, the development of his personality, his spiritual growth, his morality and self-improvement, self-realization. A person may not know much, but it is important that a truly spiritual and moral person is formed, capable of self-development and self-improvement; at the center of this paradigm is a person with all his weaknesses and virtues.

The essence of the humanistic paradigm lies in the consistent attitude of the teacher (teacher) to the student (student) as an individual, an independent and responsible subject of his own development and, at the same time, as a subject of educational influence. The main difference between this paradigm and the traditional one lies, first of all, in the fact that subject-object relations are replaced by subject-subject ones (Table 1).

The subject-object paradigm of learning has inherent shortcomings that are largely characteristic of higher education in modern Russia:

· a natural lag in the pace of transformation of the social sphere from the pace of transformation of the economy - Russia, whose market status of the economy is officially recognized by the international community, essentially preserved the state system of higher education in its original form, created and effectively working in the conditions of the planned economy of the Soviet state.

Table 1

Comparative characteristics of the traditionalist and humanistic paradigms of education

Comparable indicators Educational paradigmTraditionalistic (subject - object) Humanistic (subject - subject) 1 The main mission of education Preparing the younger generation for life and work Providing conditions for self-determination and self-realization 2 Axiological basis The needs of society and production The needs and interests of the individual 3 The goals of education The formation of a personality with predetermined properties The development of the individual as a subject of life and a person of culture 4 The role of knowledge, skills and skills The content of education Transfer to the student of ready-made samples of knowledge, skills and abilities Creation by a person of the image of the world in himself through active positing himself in the world of subject, social and spiritual culture6. The position of the pupil (student) The object of pedagogical influence, trainableThe subject of cognitive activity, student7. The role position of the teacher (teacher) Subject-oriented position: source and controller of knowledge Person-oriented: coordinator, consultant, assistant, organizer8. The relationship between the teacher and the student is subject-object, monologicrelationships: imitation, imitation, following patterns. Rivalry prevails over cooperation. Subject-subjective, dialogicrelations - joint activities to achieve the goals of education8. The nature of educational and cognitive activity Reproductive (response) activity of the student Active cognitive activity of the student

· psychological stability and inertia of the stereotypes of imperative pedagogy. Any attempts only to draw attention to the positive aspects of the organization and functioning of modern foreign educational systems cause violent protests from many adherents of the Soviet system of higher education, which was really effective for its time. The gap between the knowledge, skills and abilities of students and the rapidly changing requirements of real life -in practice, education is more often directed to the past rather than to the future. In this regard, we will only point out the cumbersome, which has no analogues in the world, is reviewed according to the legislation no less than one once every ten yearsthe system of Russian state educational standards that significantly limit the autonomy of universities and the initiative of teachers to continuously improve and develop the content of education.

· the extremely limited possibilities of individualization of the educational process, academic mobility of students and educational programs declared in our higher education in the conditions of a flow-group organization. The absence of the majority of students who are forced to combine their studies at the university with work, the ability to flexibly plan their study time has become the reason for the decrease in interest in studies and performance indicators, which is uncharacteristic for previous years and is now observed among many senior students. With flow-group training, it is very difficult to consistently master the educational programs of primary, secondary and higher vocational education in a shortened time frame, which is very inefficient in terms of public spending on education. In the modern world, the humanistic paradigm is gaining more and more priority.

LECTURE 2.

DIDACTICS OF THE HIGHER SCHOOL

learning goals

1. Have an idea about the essence of didactics of higher education;

Know the object, subject, tasks, functions and categories of didactics of higher education

Know the laws and principles of teaching in higher education.

The allotted time is 4 hours.

Lecture plan

1.

2.Pedagogy of higher education, its specifics and categories.

.Principles of teaching as the main guideline in teaching

The concept, functions and main categories of didactics, didactics of higher education.

The origin of the term "didactics" goes back to the Greek language, in which "didaktikos" means teaching, and "didasko" - studying. It was first introduced into scientific circulation by the German teacher Wolfgang Rathke (1571-1635), in a course of lectures entitled “A Brief Report from Didactics, or the Art of Ratichia Teaching” (“Kurzer Bericht von der Didactica, oder Lehrkunst Wolfgangi Ratichii”). The great Czech educator Jan Amos Comenius (1592-1670) used this concept in the same sense, publishing in 1657 in Amsterdam his famous work “The Great Didactics, Representing the Universal Art of Teaching Everyone Everything”.

In the modern sense, didactics is the most important branch of scientific knowledge that studies and investigates the problems of education and training. Didactics is a theoretical and at the same time normative-applied science. Didactic studies make real learning processes their object, provide knowledge about the regular connections between its various aspects, reveal the essential characteristics of the structural and content elements of the learning process. This is the scientific and theoretical function of didactics.

The theoretical knowledge obtained allows us to solve many problems associated with learning, namely: to bring the content of education in line with changing goals, to establish the principles of learning, to determine the optimal possibilities of teaching methods and means, to design new educational technologies, etc. All these are features of normative and applied (constructive) function of didactics.

Consider the basic concepts of didactics.

Education - purposeful, pre-designed communication, during which the education, upbringing and development of the student is carried out, certain aspects of the experience of mankind, the experience of activity and knowledge are assimilated.

Learning as a process is characterized by the joint activity of the teacher and students, which has as its goal the development of the latter, the formation of their knowledge, skills, skills, i.e. general orienting basis for specific activities.

The teacher carries out the activity denoted by the term "teaching", the learner is included in the activity teachingsthat satisfies his cognitive needs. The process of learning is largely generated by motivation.

Knowledge - it is a person's reflection of objective reality in the form of facts, ideas, concepts and laws of science. They represent the collective experience of mankind, the result of the knowledge of objective reality.

Skill - is the willingness to consciously and independently perform practical and theoretical actions based on acquired knowledge, life experience and acquired skills.

Skills - these are the components of practical activity, manifested in the performance of the necessary actions, brought to perfection through repeated exercise.

Pedagogical process - this is a way of organizing educational relations, which consists in the purposeful selection and use of external factors for the development of participants. The pedagogical process is created by the teacher.

Main subjects of the pedagogical processin higher education are teacherand students.

The structure of the pedagogical process in both secondary and higher education remains unchanged:

Purpose - Principles - Content - Methods - Means - Forms

Learning objectives - the initial component of the pedagogical process. In it, the teacher and the student understand the final result of their joint activities.

Learning principles - serve to establish ways to implement the goals of training.

Content of training - part of the experience of previous generations of people, which must be passed on to students in order to achieve their learning goals through the chosen ways of realizing these goals.

Teaching methods - a logical chain of interrelated actions of a teacher and a student, through which the content is transmitted and perceived, which is processed and reproduced.

Means of education - materialized subject methods of processing the content of training in conjunction with teaching methods.

Forms of organization of training - provide the logical completeness of the learning process.

Laws and patterns of teaching in higher education. The teacher, dealing with the design of the educational process, certainly sets himself the task of understanding the learning process. The result of this knowledge is the establishment of the laws and patterns of the learning process.

Pedagogical Law - internal, essential, stable connection of pedagogical phenomena, which determines their necessary, natural development.

Law social conditionality of goals, content and teaching methodsreveals the objective process of the determining influence of social relations, the social system on the formation of all elements of education and training. It is a question of using this law to fully and optimally transfer the social order to the level of pedagogical means and methods.

Law educational and developmental education.Reveals the ratio of mastery of knowledge, methods of activity and comprehensive development of the individual.

Law conditionality of training and education by the nature of students' activitiesreveals the relationship between pedagogical guidance and the development of students' own activity, between the ways of organizing training and its results.

Law integrity and unity of the pedagogical processreveals the ratio of the part and the whole in the pedagogical process, the need for a harmonious unity of the rational, emotional, reporting and search, meaningful, operational and motivational components, etc.

the law of unity and relationship between theory and practice in teaching.

One of the tasks of didactics is to establishlearning patterns and, thereby, to make the learning process for him more conscious, manageable, effective.

Didactic patterns establish connections between the teacher, students and the material being studied. Knowledge of these patterns allows the teacher to build the learning process optimally in different pedagogical situations.

Patterns of learning are objective, essential, stable, recurring connections between the constituent parts, components of the learning process (this is an expression of the operation of laws in specific conditions).

External patterns of the learning processcharacterize the dependence of learning on social processes and conditions:

· socio-economic,

· political situation,

· cultural level,

· the needs of society in a certain type of personality and level of education.

Internal patterns of the learning process- links between its components: goals, content, methods, means, forms, i.e. it is the relationship between teaching, learning, and the material being studied.

Consider these patterns:

The teaching activity of the teacher is predominantly educational in nature.The educational impact can be positive or negative, have a greater or lesser force, depending on the conditions in which learning takes place.

Relationship between teacher-student interaction and learning outcomes.Learning cannot take place if there is no interdependent activity of the participants in the learning process, there is no their unity. A particular manifestation of this regularity is between the student's activity and the results of learning: the more intense, more conscious the student's educational and cognitive activity, the higher the quality of education.

The strength of assimilation of educational material depends on the systematic direct and delayed repetition of what has been studied, on its inclusion in previously studied and new material.The development of mental abilities and skills of students depends on the use of search methods, problem-based learning and other methods and means that activate intellectual activity.

The next pedagogical regularity is modeling (recreation) in the educational process of the conditions of future professional activityspecialists.

The formation of concepts in the minds of students will take place only in the case of organizing cognitive activity to identify essential features, phenomena, objects, technological operations for comparing, delimiting concepts, establishing their content, volume, etc.

All the regularities of the pedagogical process are interconnected, manifest themselves through a lot of accidents, which significantly complicates it. At the same time, acting as stable trends, these patterns clearly determine the direction of the work of teachers and students.

These patterns serve as the basis for developing a system of strategic ideas that form the core of modern pedagogical learning concepts:

· the orientation of training and education to the formation of a personality, an individuality with spiritual wealth, universal values, morality, comprehensively and harmoniously developed, capable of preparatory and productive activities;

· the unity of the organization of educational, cognitive, search, creative activity of the student as a condition for the formation of personality;

· the organic unity of teaching and upbringing, which requires considering teaching as a specific way of upbringing and giving it a developing and upbringing character;

· optimization of content, methods, means; installation on the selection of methods that bring the maximum effect with relatively low cost time and labor.

The implementation of the considered laws and patterns in the educational activities of the university allows us to consider the pedagogical process as an integral phenomenon that provides high-quality training of future specialists for professional activities.

Summarized are the following requirements for the process of education in higher education:

· The content of the program material should reflect scientific truth, correspond to the current state of science, connection with life, and its presentation should correspond to the level of the latest achievements of didactics.

· Systematically create problem situations, observe the logic of the cognitive process and teach strict evidence of judgments and conclusions, which determines the developmental nature of the learning process.

· A mandatory combination of words and visualization, the use of a complex of modern technical teaching aids, the development of imagination, technical thinking as the basis of creative search activity.

· Compulsory combination of education and upbringing, give examples of the connection between theory and practice, with life, develop the ideological aspect of education.

· Systematically arouse interest in learning, form cognitive needs and creative activity. The emotionality of teaching is a must!

· Be sure to take into account the individual and age characteristics of students in the design of each lesson.

· Consistency in training, the need to rely on previous knowledge, skills and abilities, thus ensuring the availability of training.

· To constantly form the skills and abilities of students by applying their knowledge in practice, the obligatory performance of laboratory and practical work by them.

· Systematic and systematic accounting and control of knowledge, its quality and application in practice, systematic assessment of the work of each student, the indispensable encouragement of any success.

· Overloading students with training sessions is unacceptable.

Pedagogy of higher education, its specifics and categories

L.I. Gurie gives the following definition of higher education pedagogy:

"Pedagogy of higher education is a field of knowledge that expresses the main scientific ideas that give a holistic view of the patterns and significant connections in educational, cognitive, scientific, educational, professional training and the comprehensive development of students"

First of all, it should be noted that the pedagogy of higher education is a branch, a section of general pedagogy, or rather, professional pedagogy, studying regularities, carrying out theoretical substantiation, developing principles, technologies for upbringing and educating a person focused on a specific professional sphere of reality. Subjectstudying the pedagogy of higher education is only one stage in professional development - the process of training and education of specialists with higher professional education.

Thus, we will understand higher education pedagogy - branch (section) of general (professional) pedagogy, studying the main components(regularities, principles, forms, methods, technologies, content ) the educational process at the university, as well as features and conditions (requirements for the process of interaction between a teacher and a student, requirements for personalitiesteacher and student, etc. .) effective implementation of professional training of the future specialist.

Let's bring tasks of professional pedagogy, which can be attributed to tasks of higher education pedagogyas the general to the particular. They include:

Development of theoretical and methodological foundations of vocational education and research methods in professional pedagogy.

Substantiation of the essence, aspects and functions of vocational education.

The study of the history of the development of vocational education and pedagogical thought.

Analysis of the current state and forecasting of the development of vocational education in our country and abroad.

Identification of regularities of vocational training, education and personal development.

Substantiation of educational standards and content of vocational education.

Development of new principles, methods, systems and technologies of vocational education.

Determination of the principles, methods and ways of managing professional and pedagogical systems, monitoring the professional educational process and professional development of students.

In addition, one can distinguish tasks of pedagogy of the higher schoolin the practical field :

1. Formation of the skills and abilities of teachers of higher education methodologically sound conduct of all types of educational, scientific and educational work.

Establishing a connection between training, professional readiness and the formation of students' stable skills for conducting research work based on this connection.

Transformation of the educational process into the process of development of independent, creative thinking.

Formation, development, manifestation of pedagogical skills in order to mobilize students for a variety of creative activities.

Analysis of the socio-pedagogical factor, laws and features of the formation of students' pedagogical knowledge, skills, pedagogical consciousness.

Arming teachers with psychological knowledge.

The use of the content of pedagogy of higher education as a program of action for the organization and conduct of diverse types of pedagogical activities.

K to ategorical apparatus of higher education pedagogy, in addition to general pedagogical, it is possible to include professional and pedagogical categories, such as:

Professional education- the process and result of the professional development of the individual through scientifically organized vocational training and education.

Professional education - the process and result of mastering professional knowledge, skills and abilities by students.

professional education- the process and result of the formation of professionally important qualities(distinguish between general and special PVK) .

Professional Development- personal development as a subject of professional activity.

Professional development- the result of professional development: category, category, class, position, degree, rank, etc.

Pedagogy- the science of holistic ped. process. A holistic process is understood as the process of education, upbringing and development of the individual.

Pedagogy of higher education- this is a branch, a section of general pedagogy, or rather, it will be said professional pedagogy, studying regularities, carrying out theoretical substantiation, developing principles, technologies for upbringing and educating a person focused on a specific professional sphere of reality.

Subject study of higher education pedagogy is the process of training and education of specialists with higher professional education.

Pedagogical science carries out the same functions, like any other scientific discipline: description, explanation and prediction of the phenomena of the area of ​​reality that it studies.

Totasks of higher education pedagogy can be attributed:

1. Formation of the skills and abilities of teachers of higher education methodologically sound conduct of all types of educational, scientific and educational work.

2. Establishing a connection between education, professional readiness and the formation of students' stable skills for conducting research work based on this connection.

3. Transformation of the educational process into the development of independent, creative thinking.

4. Formation, development, manifestation of pedagogical skills in order to mobilize students for a variety of creative activities.

5. Analysis of the socio-pedagogical factor, laws and features of the formation of pedagogical knowledge, skills, pedagogical consciousness among students.

6. Arming teachers with psychological knowledge.

7. The use of the content of higher education pedagogy as a program of action for organizing and conducting diverse types of pedagogical activities.

2. Principles, structure of pedagogy of higher education and its connection with other sciences

The structure of the pedagogical process in both secondary and higher education remains unchanged:

Purpose - Principles - Content - Methods - Means - Forms

Learning objectives - the initial component of the pedagogical process. In it, the teacher and the student understand the final result of their joint activities.

Learning principles - serve to establish ways to implement the goals of learning.

Teaching methods - a logical chain of interrelated actions of a teacher and a student, through which the content is transmitted and perceived, which is processed and reproduced.

Means of education - materialized subject methods of processing the content of training in conjunction with teaching methods.

Forms of organization of training - provide the logical completeness of the learning process.

Principle - it is a system of initial theoretical provisions, guiding ideas and basic requirements for the design of a holistic educational process.

Each of the principles is put into practice through a system of rules.

    Principle scientific:

Use the language of the science that is being taught; introduce the history of discoveries.

    Principle links between theory and practice:

Show ways to use knowledge in practice.

    Principle systematic and consistent

Express knowledge in a particular system;

Rely on intra-subject, inter-subject, inter-scientific connections.

    Principle strength of knowledge acquisition

Teach the techniques of mental work;

Systematically organize the repetition of educational material.

    Principle consciousness and activity

Stimulate cognitive activity and their independence;

    Principle accessibility and feasibility

Take into account the real level of development and preparedness;

    Principle visibility

Ensure the perception of the material, as far as possible, by all senses;

    Principle professional orientation

Form professional values. quality;

Recently, ideas have been expressed about the allocation of a group principles of education in higher education, which would synthesize all existing principles:

    focus of higher education on the development of the personality of a future specialist;

    compliance of the content of university education with modern and predictable trends in the development of science (technology) and production (technology);

    the optimal combination of general, group and individual forms of organization of the educational process at the university;

    rational application of modern methods and teaching aids at various stages of training specialists;

    compliance of the results of training specialists with the requirements that are imposed by a specific area of ​​their professional activity; ensuring their competitiveness.

Education studies not only pedagogy, but a number of other sciences: psychology (psychological aspects of education, the personality of the teacher, the personality of the pupil, etc.), sociology (the team and the individual, relationships in communities, etc.), philosophy, history, cultural studies , valeology and many others. Pedagogy is undoubtedly closely related to the results of research conducted in these sciences. In general, distinguish two types of communication pedagogy with other sciences.


1. Psychology and pedagogy of higher education: subject, object, tasks, categories. Relationship with other sciences

General psychological context of the formation of psychology and pedagogy of higher education

The main directions of reforming education in the XXI century and the problems of modern higher education

The main tasks of higher education in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Higher Education", "National Doctrine of the Development of Education in Ukraine"

Educational levels and educational qualification levels. Levels of accreditation and types of universities

Methods for collecting empirical facts. Research skills of a teacher of higher education

The concept of personality in modern psychology. Theories of personality in the main directions of modern psychology

Methods of psychological research of personality

Methods of pedagogical influence on personality

General characteristics of student age as a period of late youth or early adulthood

Contradictions and crises of student age

University as one of the leading factors in the socialization of the student's personality as a specialist. Adaptation of students to study in higher education

Professional formation of the student's personality as a future specialist with higher education

Self-education and self-education, their importance in the professional growth of a future specialist

Psychological features of the student group, its structure

Development of the student group, characteristics of the student team. Interpersonal relations in a student group

The problem of a leader in a student group. Socio-psychological climate of the group in the group and its impact on the ability to work

Psychology of education of student youth. Modern requirements for the personality of a specialist and the tasks of educating students

The unity of the processes of training, development and education. Drivers of learning

The main lines of development in the process of education and upbringing

The development of intelligence in the process of training and education

Personality and its development in the process of education and upbringing

Students and teachers are the subjects of the educational process. Personal qualities in the structure of the subject of pedagogical activity. Subjective properties of a teacher

Psychological mechanisms for the formation of personality traits and analysis of the corresponding functions of perception

Stages of the formation of moral self-consciousness and criteria for the moral upbringing of a person

Features of pedagogical communication as a form of pedagogical interaction

Styles of pedagogical activity, their general characteristics

Difficulties and barriers in professional and pedagogical communication between teachers and students. Pedagogical ethics

Pedagogical professionalism of the teacher. The authority of the teacher. Typologies of teachers


1. Psychology and pedagogy of higher education: subject, object, tasks, categories. Relationship with other sciences


The object of science is something that exists as a given outside of the study itself, something that can be studied by different sciences. The object of pedagogical psychology is a person. The subject of pedagogical psychology is the facts, mechanisms, patterns of mastering sociocultural experience by a person and the changes caused by this process of mastering the changes in the level of intellectual and personal development of a person (child) as a subject of educational activity organized and managed by a teacher in different conditions of the educational process. In particular, pedagogical psychology “studies the patterns of mastering knowledge, skills and abilities, explores individual differences in these processes, studies the patterns of formation of active independent creative thinking in schoolchildren, those changes in the psyche that occur under the influence of training and education” i.e. formation of mental neoplasms.

) disclosure of the mechanisms and patterns of teaching and educating influence on the intellectual and personal development of the student;

) determination of the mechanisms and patterns of mastering the student's sociocultural experience, its structuring, preservation (strengthening) in the individual mind of the student and use in various situations;

) determination of the relationship between the level of intellectual and personal development of the student and the forms, methods of teaching and educating influence (cooperation, active forms of learning, etc.)

) determination of the features of the organization and management of educational activities of students and the influence of these processes on their intellectual, personal development and educational and cognitive activity;

Types of parenting:

Education is inseparable from the training in which it is carried out.

Education is carried out in the educational process of a certain system or institution and outside of education, in parallel with it (circles, social work, labor education).

Education is carried out outside the educational process (but in accordance with its general goals and values) by the family, work collective, group, community, where some spontaneous learning and learning takes place.

Education is also carried out by other (non-educational) institutions, communities (clubs, discos, companies, etc.), accompanied by spontaneous, and sometimes targeted training and learning.

Obviously, pedagogical psychology is inextricably linked with such sciences as, for example, pedagogy, physiology, philosophy, linguistics, sociology, etc.


2. General psychological context of the formation of psychology and pedagogy of higher education


Pedagogical psychology develops in the general context of scientific ideas about a person, which were fixed in the main psychological trends (theories) that have had and continue to have a great influence on pedagogical thought in each specific historical period.

Psychological currents and theories that could influence the understanding of the pedagogical process

Empirical data of G. Ebbinghaus's experiments on the study of the process of forgetting and the curve of forgetting obtained by him, the nature of which is taken into account by all subsequent researchers of memory, the development of skills, the organization of exercises.

Behaviorism of J. Watson and neobehaviorism. Already in the middle of our century, the concept of operant behavior and the practice of programmed learning were developed. A holistic concept of learning has been developed, including its laws, facts, mechanisms.

Psychoanalysis 3. Freud, C. Jung, developing the categories of the unconscious, psychological defense, complexes, stages of development of the "I", freedom, extraversion-introversion. (The latter finds the widest application and distribution in many pedagogical studies thanks to the G. Eysenck test.)

Gestalt psychology - the concept of a dynamic system of behavior or the field theory of K. Levin, genetic epistemology or the concept of staged development of intelligence by J. Piaget, which contributed to the formation of the concepts of insight, motivation, stages of intellectual development, internalization.

Cognitive psychology G.U. Neisser, M. Broadbent, and others, which focused on knowledge, awareness, organization of semantic memory, forecasting, receiving and processing information, reading and understanding processes, and cognitive styles.


3. The main directions of reforming education in the XXI century and the problems of modern higher education


The purpose of education today is to educate young people to trust in dynamic knowledge, to form the ability to learn and relearn, to realize the need to develop their creative potential.

The implementation of the task of reforming higher education is carried out in the following areas:

The humanization of higher education is the transition of mankind from an industrial (technocratic) to an information civilization, which provides for the turn of education to a holistic perception of the world and culture, to the formation of humanitarian, systemic thinking.

The task is to improve the legal, moral, psychological culture of a specialist with a higher education. An important way to accomplish these tasks is the fundamentalization of education, the result of which should be the fundamental scientific knowledge of the future specialist about society and about man. The fundamentalization of education is necessary condition, the basis for the continuous creative development of man, the basis of its self-education.

Problems:

Yesterday's students lack the ability to plan their time for successful work; Poor self-organization also leads to inefficient teamwork, because newcomers are not ready to coordinate their actions with all members of the work team; Often there is a lack of self-presentation skills (the art of showing oneself with better side), the ability to speak to a student audience, to briefly, reasonably and intelligibly express one's thoughts. Despite the fact that we live in the information age, some of the young educators do not have sufficient skills in self-education, use a computer and often get confused even in the simplest office applications.


4. The main tasks of higher education in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Higher Education", "National Doctrine of the Development of Education in Ukraine"


The main directions of reforming higher education are defined by the Law of Ukraine "On Higher Education": "The content of higher education is a system of scientific knowledge, skills and abilities, as well as professional, philosophical and civic qualities that should be formed in the process of education and upbringing, taking into account development prospects society, technology, culture and art.

Firstly, the Law speaks of a system of scientific (theoretical) knowledge, and not of individual subject knowledge. Only the generalization of subject knowledge into a system of professional theoretical knowledge provides a more professional qualification.

Secondly, the Law of Ukraine imposes requirements on the personality of a specialist with a higher education: possession of not only the necessary professional, but also the corresponding worldview and civic qualities.

This is important because specialists with higher education are the advanced part of society, its elite. These are people who create the theory, develop the scientific and methodological foundations of professional activity. They are the driving force behind the development of a society's culture.

The task of reforming higher education is specified in the "State Program for the Development of Education in Ukraine for 2005-2010 pp.":

development of a system of continuous education throughout life;

improving the quality of training, education, qualifications, competence and responsibility of specialists in all areas, their training and retraining;

integration of education and science, development and implementation of new pedagogical technologies, informatization of education;

creation of conditions for personal development and creative self-realization of each specialist;

promoting the development of professional abilities and motivation of students in the learning process.

5. Educational levels and educational qualification levels. Levels of accreditation and types of universities


The following educational levels are established in Ukraine:

· Primary general education;

· Basic general secondary education;

· Complete general secondary education;

· Vocational education;

· Higher education.

The following educational and qualification levels are established in Ukraine:

· skilled worker;

· Junior Specialist;

·Bachelor;

· Specialist, master

Accreditation of a higher education institution is a procedure for granting a certain type of higher education institution to conduct educational activities related to obtaining higher education and qualifications, in accordance with the conditions of higher education standards, as well as state conditions for personnel, scientific, methodological and logistical support.

Levels: I level technical school, II level - college, III level - institute, and IV level - academy and university.

Types of universities: Agrarian; Military; Humanities; Classic; medical; Pedagogical; Postgraduate; sports; Technical; Economic; Legal


6. Methods for collecting empirical facts. Research skills of a teacher of higher education


Experiment is the basis of the empirical approach to knowledge.

Methods for collecting empirical facts are chosen according to the goals and objectives of the study:

describe the facts: observation, analysis of products of activity, conversation, interview, questioning, study of the life path (biographical method), etc.;

measure psychic phenomena - tests;

determine the psychological characteristics -ascertaining experiment (natural or laboratory);

find factors, reveal the psychological conditions of development and transform the phenomenon -molding psychological -pedagogical experiment.

Research skills of the teacher -researcher:

1) The ability to identify a problem situation, to see it

2) The ability to accurately formulate questions in accordance with the problem situation

3) Know the conceptual apparatus of science, clearly define the content of the concept used in the study, be able to analyze and correlate different interpretations of terms, find an explanation for conflicting opinions

4) Have different tools for explaining (analysis, comparison, generalization, concretization, systematization, etc.)

5) Scientific insight, the ability to critically evaluate the results obtained and determine the prospects for further development of the problem.


7. The concept of personality in modern psychology. Theories of personality in the main directions of modern psychology


Personality is the basic category and the subject of study of personality psychology. Personality is a set of developed habits and preferences, mental attitude and tone, sociocultural experience and acquired knowledge, a set of psychophysical traits and characteristics of a person, his archetype that determines everyday behavior and connection with society and nature. Personality is also observed as manifestations of "behavioral masks" developed for different situations and social groups of interaction.

)Behaviorism. B. Skinner: personality is the result of the interaction of the individual (with his life experience) and the environment. Behavior is deterministic, predictable, and controlled by the environment. The idea of ​​internal autonomous factors as the causes of human actions is rejected, as well as the physiological and genetic explanation of behavior.

2)Psychoanalysis. Z. Freud: personality includes 3 structural components: Id (the instinctive core of the personality, obeys the pleasure principle), Ego (the rational part of the personality, the reality principle), Super-Ego (the latter is formed, this is the moral side of the personality). Personal development corresponds to the psychosexual development of a person. Stages: oral, anal, phallic (complexes: Oedipus, Electra), latent, genital. A mature person is able and willing to work to create something useful and valuable, able to love another person "for his own sake."

)Individual psychology. A. Adler: people try to compensate for the feeling of their own inferiority that they experienced in childhood. Hence the struggle for supremacy (or the desire for power). Such impulses are present in every person. In order to achieve his fictitious goals, a person develops his own unique lifestyle (most clearly manifested in solving three problems: work, friendship and love). Birth order influences the formation of personality. The last construct of personality is social interest (the internal tendency of a person to participate in the creation of an ideal society). The degree of its severity is an indicator of psychological health.

)Humanistic psychology. A. Maslow: personality is defined through a hierarchy of needs.


8. Methods of psychological research of personality


Personality research methods - a set of methods and techniques for studying the psychological manifestations of a person's personality. According to the form and conditions of conducting, they distinguish: experimental and non-experimental (for example, analysis of biographies, etc.), laboratory and clinical, direct and indirect, research and survey (psychodiagnostic) methods of personality research. Depending on the dominant aspect of consideration, methods for studying personality are distinguished:

) as individuals;

) as a subject of social activity and a system of interpersonal relations;

) as an ideal representation in other people.

)The method of conversation - the specific role of conversation, as a method of studying personality, follows from the fact that in it the subject gives a verbal report on the properties and manifestations of his personality. Therefore, in a conversation with the greatest completeness, the subjective side of the personality is revealed - self-consciousness and self-esteem of personality traits, experiences and emotional attitude expressed in them, etc.

2)Biographical method - allows you to study the stages of the life path, the features of personality formation, it can be an addition to the interpretation of data obtained by experimental methods.

)Questionnaires as one of the methods for studying personality are used to diagnose the degree of severity of certain personality traits or other traits in an individual.

There are 2 types of questionnaires: one-dimensional - one characteristic is diagnosed and multidimensional - they provide information about a number of different personality traits. Questions are closed.


9. Methods of pedagogical influence on personality


The technological scheme of the pedagogical process looks something like this. First of all, the teacher convinces the student of the importance and expediency of solving a specific problem, then he must teach the student, i.e. achieve the assimilation of a certain amount of knowledge necessary for solving the task. At the next stage, it is necessary to formulate the student's skills and abilities. At all these stages, it is useful to constantly stimulate the diligence of trainees, to control and evaluate the stages and results of the work.

1. Persuasion is a versatile influence on the mind, feelings and will of a person in order to form the desired qualities in him. Depending on the direction of pedagogical influence, persuasion can act as evidence, as suggestion, or as a combination of them. The most important role in persuasion with the help of a word is played by such techniques as conversation, lecture, debate.

2. An exercise is a systematically organized performance by pupils of various actions, practical matters in order to form and develop their personality. Teaching is the organization of systematic and regular performance by pupils of certain actions in order to form good habits. Or, to put it another way: habituation is an exercise in order to develop good habits.

3. Teaching methods are divided according to the dominant means into verbal, visual and practical. They are also classified depending on the main didactic tasks into: methods of acquiring new knowledge; methods of formation of skills and knowledge in practice; methods for testing and evaluating knowledge, skills and abilities.

To stimulate means to induce, give impetus, impetus to thought, feeling and action. A certain stimulating effect is already built into each method. But there are methods, the main purpose of which is to provide an additional stimulating effect and, as it were, to enhance the effect of other methods, which, in relation to stimulating (additional) ones, are usually called the main ones.


10. General characteristics of student age as a period of late youth or early adulthood


In the socio-psychological aspect, students, compared with other groups of the population, are distinguished by the highest educational level, the most active consumption of culture and high level cognitive motivation. At the same time, students are a social community characterized by the highest social activity and enough harmonious combination intellectual and social maturity. Taking into account this peculiarity of the student body underlies the attitude of the teacher to each student as a partner of pedagogical communication, an interesting personality for the teacher. In line with the personal-activity approach, the student is considered as an active subject of pedagogical interaction who independently organizes his activity. It is characterized by a specific orientation of cognitive and communicative activity towards solving specific professionally oriented tasks. The main form of education for students is sign-context (A.A. Verbitsky).

For the socio-psychological characteristics of students, it is important that this stage in the development of a person's life is associated with the formation of relative economic independence, the departure from the parental home and the formation of one's own family. Students are the central period of the formation of a person, a person as a whole, manifestations of a wide variety of interests. This is the time for setting sports records, artistic, technical and scientific achievements, intensive and active socialization of a person as a future "doer", a professional, which is taken into account by the teacher in the content, issues and methods of organizing educational activities and pedagogical communication at the university.

Formation of own principles and views.


. Contradictions and crises of student age


The age crisis is characterized by sharp and tangible psychological shifts and personality changes. There may be the following signs of a crisis:

) strong frustration, intense excitement for not meeting a need,

) exacerbation of role conflicts "student - teacher", "student - student",

) unstructured personality

) infantilism.

Each psychological age solves its contradictions. The crisis of 17-18 years is associated with the need for self-determination of a young person at the end of secondary school and the search for their place in the future, already an independent life. This is the construction of the next stage of one's life path, the modeling of one's "I" with a focus on the future.

The young man lives in the future rather than in the present. As a rule, life choices (like any choice) are accompanied by hesitations, doubts, self-doubt, excitement from uncertainty and at the same time responsibility for every step towards the final decision.

Among the contradictions of student age, an important place is occupied by an identity crisis, which is associated with the "I" system. Identity is a persistent image of "I", the preservation and maintenance of one's personal integrity, identity, the continuity of one's life history and one's own "I" Personal identity is a product of social identity: the perception of social impact and adaptation to it is an active selective process, and personal identity is its final manifestation.

Personal identity is a system of knowledge about oneself, which is formed when the subject compares himself with members of the group and consists of a set of features that are specific to the "I".

Thus, awareness of ongoing changes in oneself, strengthening reflection helps to overcome the identity crisis. Students should have their own defining view, their own opinion, their own assessments, views on various life conflicts, their own attitude and their own choice of life direction.


12. University as one of the leading factors in the socialization of the student's personality as a specialist. Adaptation of students to study in higher education


The period of study of a student in higher education is an extremely important period of socialization of his personality:

· at this stage, the socialization of the individual through the education system is completed;

· the foundations of further socialization in independent professional activity are laid;

· life goals are adjusted, installations for a further independent life path.

"Socialization is the process by which a culture communicates to people its beliefs, customs, habits, and language."

At student age, all the main mechanisms of socialization are involved:

· acceptance and assimilation of new social roles - the role of a student, a future specialist, a youth leader, etc.;

· professional role identification (“I am a student”, “I am a future teacher”, “I am a promising future specialist”, etc.);

· orientation to the social expectations of teachers and fellow students in order to achieve the desired social status in the group;

· comparing yourself with other students and professionals;

· suggestibility and conformity.

The source of student socialization is not only the content of the pedagogical process at the university, but also its social and professional environment, the student group, the media, public youth associations, etc. The process of socialization of the personality of the future specialist largely depends on the success of the student's adaptation to the conditions of the new cultural and educational environment.

Adaptation is the result (and process) of interaction between the individual and the environment, which ensures its optimal adaptation to life and activity.

Difficulties of the adaptation period associated with parting with school friends and depriving them of support and understanding; uncertainty of the motivation for choosing a profession and insufficient psychological readiness to master it; the unformed system of self-regulation and self-control over their activities and behavior and the lack of daily control over them by parents and teachers; search for the optimal mode of work and rest and the establishment of life; lack of skills for independent study work (inability to work with sources of information, take notes on literature, etc.).

The new social situation of the student's development is determined by the change and consolidation of his social status, the realization of his professional intentions, the development of his personality as a professional.


13. Professional development of the student's personality as a future specialist with higher education


The main feature of the student's educational and professional activity is that it is professionally directed, subject to the assimilation of methods and experience of professionally solving practical problems and production problems that university graduates will encounter in the future.

The professionalization of the student's personality, his professional development and professional growth as a specialist, the formation of a creative, spiritually rich personality, taking into account his needs, interests, desires, abilities, is one of the main tasks of modern higher education.

The process of professional self-determination is self-knowledge, it is self-assessment of one's own professional abilities and practical actions for their development, this is self-actualization. The professional orientation of the student's personality leads to the understanding and acceptance of professional tasks with an assessment of their own resources for their solution. The process of preparing a specialist with higher education covers not only the acquisition of professional knowledge, skills and abilities, but also the professionalization of the student's personality as a whole.

In educational and professional activities, professional abilities are formed, and general intellectual abilities also develop further. Each professional activity requires a set of qualities (abilities) from a specialist that determine its success. The system of professional abilities of the teacher has already been studied in the course "Pedagogical psychology". The professional abilities of a teacher of higher education will be discussed in a separate topic.

The consequence of the professional growth of the personality of the future specialist and the development of his professional abilities is the professional competence that the student acquires. Professional Competence- the ability to successfully perform the professional tasks and duties of the position for which the person is applying.

The subjective criteria for the improvement of the psyche is the ability to concentrate, concentrate attention on the essence of phenomena, control one's thoughts and emotions, and have an attraction to higher ideals. When such a desire is given complete freedom of action, they become an effective method of self-improvement.


14. Self-education and self-education, their importance in the professional growth of a future specialist


The subjective criteria for the improvement of the psyche is the ability to concentrate, concentrate attention on the essence of phenomena, control one's thoughts and emotions, and have an attraction to higher ideals. When such a desire is given complete freedom of action, they become an effective method of self-improvement.

Of great importance is the correct choice of methods and methods of self-education, among which the most effective are:

· Self-hypnosis is the development in oneself of new attitudes, unknown mental states by repeating verbal formulas to oneself or evoking images in oneself

· Self-persuasion is the process of logically proving to oneself the need to develop individual traits and qualities that are needed to achieve the goal and success of professional activity.

· Self-compulsion - to demand from yourself to do what is more important at the moment

· Self-order - an internal command to action, which is mandatory for execution, for example, to wake up in time in the morning. However, this is a tactic, not a strategy. It is impossible to abuse self-order, because this is a mockery of oneself.

· Self-approval, self-encouragement - expressions of satisfaction with oneself from achieving success and a reward to oneself.

General trends in the formation of the personality of a future specialist in the conditions of his studies at a university:

socialization of the personality of the future;

the process of professional self-determination is completed

mental processes and states are improved, acquire a “professional character”, life and professional experience is enriched

increased sense of duty and responsibility, independence and self-control

the level of student aspirations in the sphere of the future profession is growing, the motives of professional self-affirmation and self-realization are being formed;

A student of a pedagogical educational institution is characterized, first of all, by a professional and pedagogical orientation, purposeful preparation for the performance of professional functions in the pedagogical field.


15. Psychological features of the student group, its structure


The student group is an element of the pedagogical system. It performs control functions through feedback: teacher - group, group - teacher (curator). In psychology, there is even the concept of a group subject - a community of people with relevant characteristics. The student group is an autonomous and self-sufficient community. She is able to solve her own internal problems, and her activity is connected with social life institute (faculty), university, solving social issues (as an example, student construction teams, participation in the work of student self-government bodies, etc.). Students in the academic group are united by:

general goal and objectives of professional training;

joint educational and professional activities;

connections of a business and personal nature (active participation of each student in the life of the group - a good school is the property of the proper experience to live and work in any production team);

homogeneity of the composition of the group by age (late youth or early adulthood);

high awareness of each other (both about success and personal life);

active interaction in the process of communication;

high level of student self-government;

the period of existence of the group limited by the period of study in universities.

Between students, firstly, functional ties are established, which are determined by the distribution of functions between students as members of a group, and secondly, emotional ties, or interpersonal communications, which arise on the basis of sympathy, common interests. In this regard, the student group may have the following structure:

The official substructure, which is characterized by the intended purpose of the group - professional training, assistance in the formation of the personality of the future specialist. It is based on the authority of the official leader - the headman, appointed by the directorate (dean's office), as well as other leaders who carry out role-based management of the group, organize business relations between group members (trade union leader, cult trader, editor, etc.). - This is a business relationship.

An informal substructure arises when a group is divided into microgroups that arise on the basis of the same interests, manifestations of empathy, sympathy for each other - this is the emotional sphere of relationships.

pedagogical psychological student teacher


16. Development of the student group, characteristics of the student team. Interpersonal relations in a student group


During the period of its existence, the student academic group develops and goes through several stages, each of which is characterized by the qualitative features of the following parameters:

direction of behavior and activities of group members;

organization of group members;

communication among group members.

The holistic characteristics of the student group are the following indicators: intra- and integrupova activity; psychological microclimate in the group (emotional status); the referentiality of the group - its significance, its authority for the members of the group; guidance and leadership; cohesion, etc. According to these indicators, the following stages of development of the student group are determined:

1st stage - a nominal group, which has only an external, formal association of students by order of the rector and the list of the directorate (dean's office);

2nd stage - association - initial interpersonal integration, primary association of students on common grounds.

3rd stage - cooperation, at which the socio-psychological and didactic adaptation of students is almost completed.

It turns out that unofficial organizers, authoritative activists of the group. They are assigned social attitudes and leadership of the inner life of the group. The general requirement for the group at this stage is as follows: to show sensitivity to comrades, mutual respect, help each other, etc. Only under such socio-psychological conditions will the group reach the highest level of its development.

4th stage - the student academic group becomes a team. In each group there is a continuous exchange of socio-psychological information. Group norms - a set of rules and requirements developed by a group that regulate the behavior of its members. Group mood - the general emotional state that prevails, prevails in the group, creates an emotional atmosphere in it.

Group cohesion - is determined by the degree of commitment of a group of its members. Self-affirmation - each member of the team is aware of himself as part of it and tries to take and hold a certain position in it.

Collectivist self-determination - although each student has a certain freedom for individual judgment in the group, however, for him the most significant is the collective opinion, group assessment, and the group decision is the guide to action. The reasons for the contradictions in the student team can be the following:

inadequate assessment of the partner;

overestimated self-esteem of individual students;

violation of the sense of justice;

distortion by an individual student of information about another;

incorrect attitude towards each other;

just a misunderstanding with each other. Types of intragroup conflicts:

role conflict - inadequate performance of social roles;

conflict of desires, interests, etc.;

conflict of norms of behavior, values, life experience.


17. The problem of a leader in a student group. Socio-psychological climate of the group in the group and its impact on the ability to work


The role of mental determination of the process of managing social phenomena cannot be underestimated. The role of the psychological factor in the entire system of social relations is quite important. There are no issues of leadership that do not require the mobilization of the will, consciousness, energy of a person. The specifics of managing a student academic group is associated with the existence of a number of problems:

· The problem of contact between the headman and the group. The task of the headman is to establish contacts with the student group for cooperation.

· The problem of mediation between students and the administration of the institute (dean's office).

· The problem of organizing a group into a close-knit team, in which the values ​​of vocational training should be in the first place.

· The problem of regulating conflicts, finding the best ways to resolve them and creating conditions for the prevention of occurrence.

A leader is a person who all other members of the group recognize the right to take on the most responsible decisions that affect their interests and determine the direction and nature of the activities of the entire group. The leader is recognized by the group on the basis of pronounced personal qualities that appeal to the members of this microgroup, are reference for it, the most important of which are the following:

interest in achieving a group goal;

greater awareness of the problem to be solved;

a sense of personal dignity;

energy;

initiative and high social activity;

emotional stability;

self confidence;

organizational skills;

experience and organizational skills;

mental capacity;

goodwill and empathy;

emotional attraction like that.

18. Psychology of education of student youth. Modern requirements for the personality of a specialist and the tasks of educating students


The problem of educating a future specialist with a higher education is now becoming particularly relevant and acute. The fact is that technological progress does not automatically lead to spiritual progress, which results in an aggravation global problems humanity: the danger of an ecological catastrophe, the threat of a world nuclear war, the spread of international terrorism, etc.

Today, the priority of the development of society should be the spiritual improvement of man for the transition of mankind to a new round of evolutionary development: from a reasonable man (Homo Sapiens) to a moral, spiritual man (Homo Moralis). Therefore, now the goal of educating a young person all over the world is her spiritual growth, moral development, cultural enrichment.

The task of higher education is to ensure a close connection between vocational training and the moral education of students, the preparation of future specialists to perform social functions in the new conditions of the development of society.

At the present stage of higher education, education, in a broad sense, is considered in two aspects: education of the creative personality of a future specialist (teacher, psychologist, engineer, etc.). And the upbringing of a highly moral, tolerant personality with high civic qualities.

In higher education, there is a need for a thorough ethical education, which will help students to imbue the high concepts of spirituality, morality and a sense of civic responsibility.

Students need to form their own educational paradigm, which is based on the principles of continuous self-education, the formation of the ability to be the master of one's life, the constant development of one's creative potential, i.e. involves self-organization to increase the level of competitiveness in the labor market and further one's professional growth.


19. The unity of the processes of training, development and education. Drivers of learning


The educational process is considered as the unity of the processes of training, development and education of students.

Consider the pedagogical process as a system. The pedagogical process is the main, unifying system. It combines the processes of formation, development, education and training together with all the conditions, forms and methods of their flow.

The driving forces of the learning process are contradictions

The interest of students does not always coincide with the subject and course of the lesson.

Each student arranges new knowledge and skills in his own system of knowledge and experience in a completely special way. Moreover, such a subjective arrangement of knowledge is in a certain contradiction with the objective logic of science and the logic of the presentation of the material by the teacher.

Interest must be maintained by special didactic methods.

High-quality, logical and systematic presentation of educational material and thoughtful organization of students' work in the learning process. But even this does not guarantee the same good quality, consistency and consistency in the knowledge and skills of students.

The driving forces of the learning process are the contradictions between a more complex cognitive task and the presence of the old, insufficient ways to solve it. Between the required and achieved level of students' attitudes to learning, to the process of obtaining knowledge. Between old knowledge and new knowledge. Between knowledge and the ability to use it.


20. The main lines of development in the process of training and education


There are three main lines of development:

) development of abstract thinking;

) development of analyzing perception (observation);

) development of practical skills.

These three sides of the psyche reflect the three general lines of a person's attitude to reality:

· obtaining data about reality with the help of one's own senses - with the help of observations;

· abstraction, distraction from direct data, their generalization;

· material impact on the world with the aim of changing it, which is achieved by practical actions.


. The development of intelligence in the process of training and education


Through upbringing, training, a person masters specific norms and roles that he has to perform in society. They create a very specific individual for a specific social environment, for specific social relations, with specific properties of behavior, experience, knowledge, worldview, etc.

Education is a purposeful activity for the formation of certain personal qualities of a person (to be neat, polite), it is a process of constant spiritual enrichment and renewal. But education is not just advice. Any upbringing is a dynamic intervention, that is, by educating, we change the being of a person.

Education is a conscious activity aimed at mastering knowledge, skills, development skills of mental powers and abilities of a person. We note the close connection between upbringing and education - by educating, we educate and vice versa. You also need to know that education and training< - это виды духовного производства человека. Если воспитание это духовно-практический способ освоения мира, то обучение это познавательно-теоретический способ освоения мира. И если обучение создает предмет для человека, показывает ему мир, то воспитание формирует субъекта для этого мира, способ его действия в нем. Через образование наследуется опыт предыдущих поколений человечества, оно консервирует опыт, оно тиражирует, распределяет, кому сколько дать знаний, адаптирует человека к конкретной обстановке. И в каждом уважающим себя обществе значение и роль образования очень велики и прописаны в официальных государственных документах


22. Personality and its development in the process of education and upbringing


Education is a purposeful formation of a personality based on the formation of:

certain relations to objects, phenomena of the surrounding world;

worldview;

behavior (as a manifestation of relationships and worldview).

Types of education:

mental;

moral;

physical;

labor;

aesthetic, etc.

Education is a specially organized, purposeful process of direct transfer of the experience of generations, knowledge, skills in the interaction of a teacher and a student.

Education is the main force that can give society a full-fledged personality. The effectiveness of educational influence lies in purposefulness, systematic and qualified leadership.

At present, it is necessary to return education to the context of culture, i.e., to focus it on universal human values, world and national spiritual culture, the development of humanistic learning technologies, the creation of an environment in educational institutions that forms a personality capable of creative implementation in modern conditions.



The subject is a consciously acting person, whose self-consciousness is "awareness of oneself as a being who is aware of the world and changes it, as a subject, an acting person in the process of his activity - practical and theoretical, including the subject of the activity of awareness."

The subject of the educational process as the activity of an aggregate subject, i.e. what it is aimed at is a set of values ​​of social consciousness, a system of knowledge, methods of activity, the transfer of which on the part of the teacher meets with a certain way of mastering them by the student. If his method of mastering coincides with the method of action offered by the teacher, then the combined activity brings satisfaction to both parties. If at this point there is a discrepancy, then the very generality of the subject is violated.

A specific feature of the subjects of the educational process is also their motivational sphere, which consists of two sides. The subject of pedagogical activity in an ideal scheme works to achieve a common goal - "for students and then for themselves." The subject of educational activity acts, as it were, in the opposite direction of this scheme: “for himself in order to achieve a common goal” as a distant and not always explicable perspective.

The common point for the educational process “for the student” on the part of the teacher and “for himself” on the part of the student determines the pragmatic, “actually acting”, in the terminology of A.N. Leontiev, motive. It is he who characterizes the actions of the total ideal subject represented by the teacher and the student. “Understood” motives lie, as it were, at the basis of the educational process, not always even fully realized not only by the student, but also by the teacher.


24. Students and teachers are subjects of the educational process. Personal qualities in the structure of the subject of pedagogical activity. Subjective properties of a teacher


Pedagogical interaction is a deliberate contact (long-term or temporary) between the teacher and students, which results in mutual changes in their behavior, activities and relationships. Pedagogical interaction is an essential characteristic of the pedagogical process, which is a specially organized interaction of teachers and students, regarding the content of education using the means of training and education (pedagogical means) in order to solve the problems of education aimed at meeting both the needs of society and the individual himself in his development and self-development.

Pedagogical interaction always has two interdependent components - pedagogical influence and the response of the student (pupil, student). Influences can be direct and indirect, differ in direction, content and forms of presentation, the presence or absence of feedback, etc. The pupils' responses are also diverse: they are active perception, information processing, ignoring or opposition, emotional experiences or indifference, actions, etc.

Requirements for a teacher:

) creating conditions for the safe manifestation of the personality of each student in various educational situations, which requires the teacher, first of all, to be not in the traditional position of a teacher-informer, a source of knowledge and controller, but in the position of a leading partner, helping the self-development of the student's personality;

) the development of the internal motivational sphere of the student, the formation of his own cognitive need not only in obtaining and assimilating new knowledge, but also in developing generalized methods of educational activity, the ability to enjoy and satisfy knowledge;

) a large internal work of the teacher on personal and professional self-development (development of creative potential, which allows to adequately solve the general task of training and development, taking into account the individual characteristics of each student and study group).

Student requirements:

) the activity of the student, his readiness for educational activities;

) coordination of external (primarily achievement motives) and internal (cognitive) motives;

) greater independence of the student, a certain level of self-regulation and self-awareness (goal setting, self-control and self-esteem).


25. Psychological mechanisms for the formation of personality traits and analysis of the corresponding functions of perception


The formation of personality is the process of mastering a special sphere of social experience, but it is completely different from the mastery of knowledge, skills, etc. Indeed, as a result of this mastery, new motives and needs are formed, their transformation and subordination. It is impossible to achieve this by simple assimilation - these would be motives known, but not really acting. New needs and motives, their subordination arise not during assimilation, but during experiencing or living: this process occurs only in real life, always emotionally saturated, often subjectively creative. According to A.N. Leontiev, in line with the theory of activity, a person is "born" twice. Its first "birth" - at the preschool age, when a hierarchy of motives is established, the first correlation of immediate motives with social criteria - it becomes possible to act contrary to direct motives, in accordance with social motives. It is marked by the establishment of the first hierarchical relations of motives, the first subordination of immediate motives to social norms. So, here is born what is reflected in the first criterion of personality. Her second "birth" - at the age of adolescence and is associated with the awareness of the motives of her behavior and the possibility of self-education. It is expressed in the appearance of the desire and ability to realize one's motives and carry out active work on their subordination and resubordination. This ability for self-consciousness, self-guidance and self-education is reflected in the second criterion of personality. Its obligation is also fixed in the legal concept of criminal liability.


26. Stages of the formation of moral self-consciousness and criteria for the moral upbringing of a person


Self-consciousness belongs to the integral subject and serves him to organize his own activities, his relationships with others and his communication with them.

Self-consciousness in the mental activity of a person acts as a complex process of mediated self-knowledge, deployed in time, associated with the movement from single, situational images through the integration of such situational images into a holistic formation - the concept of one's own Self.

Self-knowledge is a complex multi-level process, individually deployed in time. Very conditionally, 2 stages can be distinguished: the knowledge of one's own characteristics through the knowledge of the characteristics of another, comparison and differentiation; at the 2nd stage, introspection is connected.

A person learns the world around him, and at the same time, himself through active interaction with the world. The stages of the formation of self-knowledge are distinguished, connecting each of these stages with a new opportunity for the subject to separate himself from other objects, people; with the ability to become more independent and influence the world around (in a child, this is associated with the first manipulations with objects, after walking, then with the appearance of speech). At the initial stages, the mechanisms of internalization of knowledge about others about themselves are also especially important. So, the child learns and uses in self-knowledge:

Values, parameters of assessments and self-assessments, norms;

self-image;

Attitude towards oneself and self-assessment by parents;

Someone else's self-esteem (for example, parental);

Ways to regulate behavior;

The level of expectations and claims.

Self-knowledge is a dynamic process

Some teachers use a six-point scale for registering the moral upbringing of a person. In it, three positive assessments (+1, +2, +3) express the degree of moral upbringing (readiness) and three negative assessments (-1, -2, -3) - the degree of moral bad manners (neglect). Qualitative assessments are assigned quantitative equivalents according to the following criteria:

readiness for positive manifestations: +1;

aspiration to positive actions: +2

stability, activity when performing positive actions: +3;

readiness for negative manifestations: -1;

tendency to negative actions: -2

antisocial behavior: -3.


27. Features of pedagogical communication as a form of pedagogical interaction


The university differs from the school in the content of education and upbringing, in the change in their forms. The main function of the university is the formation of the personality of a specialist. And this goal should be subordinated to the communication of teachers and students. The system of university pedagogical communication in the "teacher-student" link is qualitatively different from school communication by the very fact of their involvement in a common profession, and this greatly contributes to the removal of the age barrier that hinders fruitful joint activity.

The system of university pedagogical communication combines two factors:

) the relationship of the slave-leader;

) the relationship of cooperation between the student and the teacher.

It is this socio-psychological core that gives the relationship at the university a special emotional productivity. Without an awareness of partnership in the activities of students, it is difficult to involve them in independent work, instill in them a taste for the profession, and educate the professional orientation of the individual as a whole. The most fruitful process of university upbringing and education is ensured precisely by a system of relationships that is reliably built at the university level.

The main requirements for the "teacher-student" relationship can be formulated as follows:

interaction of factors of cooperation and statements in the organization of the educational process;

formation of the spirit of corporatism, collegiality, professional community with teachers;

orientation of the system of pedagogical communication to an adult with a developed self-awareness and thereby overcoming the authoritarian educational influence;

the use of the professional interest of students as a factor in the management of education and training and as the basis of pedagogical and educational work.

This style is formed under the influence of two important factors:

passion for science, subject;

the desire to turn the field of scientific research into the material of pedagogical influence, the so-called pedagogical feeling.


28. Styles of pedagogical activity, their general characteristics


Styles of pedagogical activity are divided into three general types: authoritarian, democratic and liberal.

authoritarian style. The student is considered as an object of pedagogical influence, and not an equal partner. The teacher alone decides, makes decisions, establishes strict control over the fulfillment of the requirements presented to them, uses his rights without taking into account the situation and the opinions of students, does not justify his actions to students. As a result, students lose activity or carry it out only with the leading role of the teacher, they show low self-esteem, aggressiveness. The main methods of influence of such a teacher are orders, teaching. The teacher is characterized by low satisfaction with the profession and professional instability. Teachers with this style of leadership pay the main attention to the methodological culture, they often lead in the teaching staff.

Democratic style. The student is considered as an equal partner in communication, a colleague in the joint search for knowledge. The teacher involves students in decision-making, takes into account their opinions, encourages independence of judgment, takes into account not only academic performance, but also personal qualities students. Methods of influence are motivation for action, advice, request. In teachers with a democratic leadership style, students are more likely to have high self-esteem. Such teachers are characterized by greater professional stability and satisfaction with their profession.

Liberal style. The teacher moves away from decision-making, transferring the initiative to students and colleagues. The organization and control of the activities of students is carried out without a system, shows indecision, hesitation. The classroom has an unstable microclimate, hidden conflicts.


Difficulties and barriers in professional and pedagogical communication between teachers and students. Pedagogical ethics


Difficulties in professional and pedagogical communication between teachers and students can be divided into categories:

The halo effect is the spread of a general evaluative impression of a person to all of his still unknown personal qualities and properties, actions and deeds. Previously formed idea hinders to truly understand a person.

The effect of the first impression is the conditionality of the perception and evaluation of a person by the first impression of him, which turns out to be erroneous.

The effect of primacy - attaching great importance to the perception and evaluation of an unfamiliar pupil or group of the information about him that was received earlier.

Novelty effect - giving great importance to later information when perceiving and evaluating a familiar person.

The projection effect is the attribution of one's virtues to pleasant pupils or other people, and one's shortcomings to unpleasant ones.

The effect of stereotyping is the use of a stable image of a person in the process of interpersonal perception. It leads to a simplification in the knowledge of a person, the aging of an inaccurate image of another, to the emergence of prejudice.


30. Pedagogical professionalism of the teacher. The authority of the teacher. Typologies of teachers


Pedagogical skills represent a set of the most diverse actions of the teacher, which primarily correlate with the functions of pedagogical activity, to a large extent reveal the individual psychological characteristics of the teacher (teacher) and testify to his subject-professional competence.

The three main skills of a teacher:

)the ability to transfer knowledge known to the teacher, solutions, methods of training and education in a new pedagogical situation.

2)the ability to find a new solution for each pedagogical situation

)the ability to create new elements of pedagogical knowledge and ideas and design new techniques to solve a specific pedagogical situation

The authority of the teacher is a complex phenomenon that qualitatively characterizes the system of relations with the teacher. The relationship of students to an authoritative teacher is positively emotionally colored and saturated. And the higher this authority, the more important for the pupils of science, the basics of which are taught by the teacher, the more fair his demands, remarks seem, the more weighty his every word

Among teachers, the following types of false authority are most common.

Suppressive authority: is gained by systematically demonstrating superiority and the ability to keep students in constant, unconscious fear of being punished or ridiculed for an unsuccessful answer or exercise, of being shouted at, punished.

distance authority. The teacher, educator strives to always keep students at a distance. Enters with them only in official contacts. In an effort to be inaccessible and mysterious, such a teacher exalts his person, creates privileges for himself, up to doing extraneous matters in the lesson, going to the presidium of a school or student meeting, although no one puts him there, getting food in the dining room without a queue.

The authority of pedantry. The teacher-educator has a system of petty, useless conventions and traditions. He constantly finds fault with those involved. Moreover, his cavils are not consistent with common sense, they are simply unreasonable. The pedant is unfair and his actions are ineffective. With such a teacher, the students lose confidence in their abilities, in the classroom one part of the students grossly violates discipline, the other is constrained, tense.

The authority of reasoning. The teacher, trying to gain authority in this way, endlessly teaches pupils, believing that notations are the main means of education. Students quickly get used to the words of such teachers, stop reacting to them and, irritably, and sometimes laughing, listen to the stream of moralizing flowing from the lips of a passionate interlocutor with the eloquence of a teacher.

The authority of imaginary kindness. More often than other types of false authority, they are found among young teachers. Not having sufficient pedagogical experience, these youth leaders believe that students will appreciate their kindness, connivance and respond with obedience, attention, love. It turns out just the opposite. The students ignore the instructions and even the requests of the elder and, in addition, they laugh at him.


Tutoring

Need help learning a topic?

Our experts will advise or provide tutoring services on topics of interest to you.
Submit an application indicating the topic right now to find out about the possibility of obtaining a consultation.

Ministry of Education and Science of the Moscow Region

GOU VPO "Moscow State Regional Social and Humanitarian Institute"

Abstract on the topic:

"Actual problems of pedagogy of the Higher School"

Performed:

Postgraduate student of the Department of Literature

distance learning

Soldatkina Anastasia Vladimirovna

Kolomna

2014

In preparing this essay, mainly materials were usedVI scientific-practical conference "Humanitarian readings at MITHT". The conference was dedicated to the 75th anniversary of prof. V.G. Einstein and took place at MITHT them. M.V. Lomonosov in 2005.

Rector of MITHT, professor, doctor of technical sciences Frolkova A.K. spoke at the conference about the pedagogical heritage of Viktor Gertsevich Einstein - professor, doctor of technical sciences, professor of the Department of Pakht, in particular, about how he solved the problem of the need for a lecture as a form of education in the Higher School in the 80s. In the 80s, following trends from the West, the leadership of the Higher School launched a massive attack on the lecture method of presenting educational material. Lectures were declared a monologue, and therefore a passive form of education, and their share in work programs was subject to a significant reduction (following the example of the "advanced" Western countries). Such an attitude towards lectures was justified: many lectures were indeed read at a low level. Raising it is a difficult task, not solvable in 2-3 years; it would have been easier to declare lectures an inactive form of learning and to call on higher educational institutions to curtail it substantially. The professor spoke out against the above thesis, without disputing its validity for bad lectures and affirming the complete unlawfulness - for good . It was then that the idea arose to highlight the negative aspects that are the reason for criticizing the lecture method as a whole, and to formulate the indispensable features of the lecture, which make it the most active form of education. In support of his arguments, the professor decided to read exactly lecture about lecturing in front of teaching teams. A lecture on the indicated topic, designed for large teaching teams (100-200 people), was read in the mid-80s. three times: at MITHT them. M.V. Lomonosov, in MKhTI im. DI. Mendeleev, at the scientific and methodological Conference in Kazan. In all cases, it was successful, raising many questions and lively discussions.

Einstein attributed the following tasks to the lecturer:

  1. to give the student a certain amount of knowledge in the most economical and systematized form;
  2. ignite the student, instill in him an interest in the subject, awaken his activity;
  3. to demonstrate (unobtrusively, of course) to the student their own attitude to the matter and THEREFORE to instill in the student an appropriate attitude (no words, appeals without a personal example - do not affect the student).

Further, the professor says that it is necessary to give the BASIS at the lecture and, first of all, methods, techniques, approaches that allow you to independently obtain additional Knowledge. In descriptive courses, emphasis should be placed not on facts, but on systematization and classification; in most natural, engineering - on causal and logical relationships (with a minimum of axiomatics and empiricism). The lecturer must POST A PROBLEM, designate the HEADINGS of sections and subsections (sometimes a lecture plan is useful, sometimes it is better to do it in the course of a lecture). facts"; trying to squeeze a lot of facts (numbers; formulas, especially empirical ones; formulations; events and dates) into students is not teaching. The main thing in the lecture is EVIDENCE, work for understanding. The lecturer must educate the student's ability to perceive ideas and their movement, help the student to master the logic of reasoning necessary for him to CREATIVITY in the future. Also, the lecturer should not be a repeater of ideas. He must build a lecture in such a way that a dialogue arises between the student and the problem - then the student becomes a co-creator of the theory. The lecturer must choose the most important, discarding details, details, particulars - their abundance ruins the lecture, they should be involved only for illustration. But it is necessary to give a basis in such a way that particulars can be seen from it, so that when studying the lecture (even better - during it), the student will have QUESTIONS (and about particulars too). In order for lectures not to lose their significance and attractiveness for students, it is necessary to increase the emotional the lecturer’s return: a kind of “Law of conservation of emotions.” Eisenstein quotes: “It is necessary not to drive to the top of knowledge, not to drag it to it, but to CAPTURE, because those who are carried away rise by themselves.In order to create a high emotional state of the listeners, the lecture should have a tinge of a solemn (somewhat festive) act. That is why latecomers must not be admitted to the lecture, and the lecturer himself, of course, cannot be late for it; during the lecture, one should not be allowed to engage in extraneous matters; The lesson must not end prematurely. The professor says: “At the lecture, attendance should not be checked and tests should not be carried out (in anticipation of them, students have completely different emotions). And, of course, the emotional mood of students drops sharply if the audience is not ready for the lecture (if the lecturer starts the lecture by looking for chalk or a rag; if he can hardly cope with a low-quality board; if the audience door does not close, if there are no curtains on the windows) or somewhere nearby, noisy repairs are being carried out, or a piano tuner is diligently functioning on the eve of holidays.

And if the lecturer perceives such deviations from normal conditions calmly, then this does not at all indicate his consistency, but only that the thickness of his skin has exceeded the critical value necessary for

maintaining a high emotional level of the lecture.

The scourge of lectures is distraction of students' attention. It can be avoided only by creating a tense atmosphere in lectures. The attention of a person (a student at a lecture) is attracted by strong and short-term stimuli: an interesting fact, and even in a skillful presentation; joke; acute social information, a paradox. (From V.K. Vilyunas: "In a complex chord, it is not the most intense, but the most dissonant tone that is most clearly perceived").

It is only necessary to correctly dose stimuli: with repeated action, their effectiveness decreases, and with frequent action, the opposite effect: inhibition. The novelty of information (and this is one of the main incentives for learning) "hammers" extraneous stimuli - the student is attentive. And the lack of novelty (I especially appeal to lecturers who largely repeatprevious and even a school course!) - and so, the lack of novelty increases fatigue, even causes drowsiness. And, of course, one should not “chew” the same thought for a long time, repeating it in different ways - the stimulus becomes monotonous, attention goes out. When a lecture is given without a summary, its emotional impact is undoubtedly higher. If the lecture is read according to the abstract, it will certainly lose something, it becomes “similar to a training dance of a ballerina holding on to a barre: the movements are correct, but there is no dance” (S.F. Ivanova).

Einstein believes that dictation of lecture material is unacceptable because of the decrease in the emotional side of the lecture and because it weans the student from thinking (after all, you can take dictation without thinking about what you are writing down), and even more so to formulate thoughts. Decreased activity and mood for independent work. Dictation takes a student's time: how much can you write down in 2 hours of a lecture? (It's faster to READ the material - either in a textbook or a pre-copied lecture text). You can dictate definitions, quotes, etc. materials; all this should make up a small fraction of the lecture.

It is impossible to define the new through terms that have not yet been introduced or those that the student does not fully master (this happens in lectures on social disciplines when the lecturer flaunts "isms") - otherwise the student develops an "inferiority complex", he painfully strives to decipher (remember, think) incomprehensible and loses the thread of the presentation as a whole. The lecturer is obliged to clear the language of "garbage". If every 2-3 minutes he says “here” or “so to speak” (or uses some kind of clericalism or makes an unusual accent), then the student will begin to pay attention not to the content of the lecture, but to this defect (it is possible that someone will begin to count how many times during the lecture this same “so to speak”) is uttered). The professor notices that students do not always approve of the use of mock-ups and drawings in lectures - “for clarity”. Apparently, in higher education, a certain level of ABSTRACT of presentation is necessary.

The emotional level of a lecture can be provided in different ways: a historical digression, digression from the topic (including from personal experience); apt quotation; figurative epithet or comparison; intonation; facial expression, gesture; joke (sometimes the lecturer just needs to smile). Skillfully placed accents and semantic pauses make it possible to avoid the negative consequences of the “law of the edge” (it is known that listeners remember the beginning and end of a fragment, section, piece of a lecture better, worse - the middle). Hence the conclusion: more “beginnings” and “ends”, that is, striking moments, accents. Acceleration of workability in lectures can be facilitated, for example, by a brief (2-3 minutes) reminder of the previous material (the main drawing of the object of study; formulas that will be needed later and etc.). This is not a loss, but a gain in time - the student's activity at the lecture will be higher. Preparing a high-quality lecture on the search for imagery, expressiveness, brightness is akin (should be akin!) to the work of an actor, artist: the same pangs of creativity, and no less responsibility. Reading Lectures are hard work, and not only in preparation. The costs of nervous energy are very high, and the physical activity of the lecturer during the lecture itself, read in a qualified manner and on a high emotional note. “You can even offer a way to assess the quality of a lecture - to weigh the lecturer before and after the lecture: if the weight has changed little, then the lecture is badly read!” Einstein says. The lecture is dated 1996.

Scientific methodological research at MITHT:
essence, history, results

Scientific and methodological studies include research designed to create a scientific basis for understanding and building the educational process. The roles and significance of traditions, accumulated experience, "common sense" in the organization of teaching-learning, of course, cannot be denied; however, they are not enough for the optimal conduct of the educational process, forecasting future changes and ensuring readiness for them, creating breakthrough (often non-trivial) educational technologies and their implementation. This insufficiency is especially acute now - in the period of rapid and significant changes in the life of higher education, requiring an understanding of the new situation and updating approaches to the organization of the educational process in its most diverse aspects. Hence the relevance of scientific and methodological research.

Until the 70s of the last century, in non-pedagogical universities (including engineering) scientific and methodological work was carried out only occasionally, and in pedagogical universities, their topics, as a rule, were limited to issues of higher education pedagogy, personal and social psychology. Meanwhile, the problems of higher education are much broader, and these problems are subject to scientific analysis and substantiation. Yes, in last years the amount of scientific knowledge that needs to be communicated to students has grown, and in a number of disciplines their significant complication has occurred. New requirements are imposed on the methods of presenting material to students: more and more emphasis is placed on the logical beginning, cause-and-effect relationships; descriptive material, axiomatics are reduced to a reasonable minimum. Changes in the contingent of applicants and students in universities (growth of student awareness with a simultaneous noticeable decrease in the motivation for learning activities, especially in technical higher education) increase the role of the emotional element in teaching and at the same time require a more precise organization of the educational process at all levels. From year to year, the volume of the teaching load, the number of duties of the teacher increase; all this is exacerbated by the above-mentioned complication of disciplines and the decline in students' attitude to study - the problem of teaching work is exacerbated.

The above and other points require changes in the work of individual units of higher education: sometimes it is enough to slightly correct the existing practice, often a significant restructuring is necessary to streamline the educational process. But in all cases, such changes should be preceded by a clear knowledge of the real situation, bottlenecks in the organization of the educational process, an idea of ​​rational ways to solve problems - both for higher education in general and for specific universities. Scientific and methodological work (SWR) should play a decisive role here.

Scientific and methodological research at the university can be classified according to various sections - all of them are represented in MITHT to one degree or another.

By the nature of the research itself, we can distinguish:

 theoretical works that allow revealing the basic patterns of cognition in the process of learning, the influence of the main factors on it, revealing the features of individual aspects of the educational process; such works include those carried out using the mathematical apparatus: despite the qualitative nature of modeling and the difficulties of quantitative assessments, these studies allow solving some learning problems at the level of "more - less", "better - worse", and in some cases lead to completely specific conclusions;

 Empirical (sociologically colored) research: surveys of various subjects of the educational process (students, teachers, etc.), expert assessments on specific issues of the educational process; the analysis of the results obtained here allows the organizers of the educational process to maintain feedback with its subjects, to promptly take appropriate measures, in particular, to eliminate the identified shortcomings;

 work with documentation of legislative, instructive and reporting levels: such work allows you to outline the path of movement and evaluate the results of the activities of individual parts of the university, reveals the subject of future theoretical and empirical research, and in some cases a comparative analysis of this documentation gives rise to the question of adjusting some regulatory documents .

Research areas include, for example:

 work of a global nature related to the construction of higher education in the country (without understanding the ways of the overall development of higher education, it is impossible to rationally organize the activities of an individual university);

 work in the field of didactics, hermeneutics, psychology and pedagogy of higher education; without such a scientific base, the successful functioning of any university cell is hardly possible;

 development and diversification of the problems of unity and inconsistency of the content and methods of presenting educational material;

 study of the time budget of students and teachers allows you to competently (not on a whim) build the educational process - from the organization of the semester to

Distribution of the workload of the teaching staff;

 study of the quality of setting up the educational process (by departments, by individual teachers) allows you to identify and support the most effective methods of work and, conversely, to identify and expand bottlenecks, as well as determine the forms of advanced training for teachers;

 development of the problem of creating new and modifying traditional training courses, textbooks and teaching aids for them.

A number of other areas of NMR have been implemented at MITHT - more on them later.

We emphasize that there are, of course, certain regularities that are common to all universities or to groups of universities with a similar focus. However, in relation to individual universities, there still remains specificity, due to the specific situation, traditions, student population, and other circumstances. Therefore, NMR should be carried out in every university.

Systematic scientific and methodological research began at MITHT in the mid-70s, when a group of teachers undertook an initiative study of the balance of time for students of three junior courses. Subsequently, on the basis of this group, a methodological section of the scientific organization of the educational process was formed, and a few years later, an educational and methodological department (UMO) and a laboratory for problems of higher education (LPVSh) were created at the university. The members of this section and the laboratory carried out scientific and methodological work in the above directions, and in the 80s many empirical studies were carried out, and in the 90s theoretical works, mainly of a methodological nature, prevailed. In addition, since the beginning of the 1990s, LPVSH has substantiated and developed (detailed) the transition of MITHT (one of the first in the country) to a multi-level education system and took an active part in its implementation.

Among the works of a global nature is the formulation of the goals of higher education: training of specialists; meeting the needs of the individual in education; preservation and accumulation of scientific, cultural and spiritual values ​​of society. The opinion has been expressed that higher education, in principle, should not adapt to the momentary interests of society, now to the market. It is necessary to strive for their integration: then there is an averaging of the levels of higher education and the market economy, society as a whole, which is for the benefit of society.

The problem of the scale of training specialists in various areas was studied; it should be solved in different ways, based on the current situation and prospects. In the 1970s and 1980s, there was an overproduction of engineers in the USSR and it was necessary to reduce their training. By the middle of the 90s, specialists in the mass left the research institutes and GIPRO, universities and enterprises. And today it is impossible to reduce the training of engineers in a number of specialties, otherwise the revival of entire sectors of the national economy will be slowed down.

General for higher technical education are the problems associated with the relationship between the questions "How to teach" and "What to teach". As part of resolving this problem, a number of theoretical works were carried out: on the linearity-nonlinearity of thinking and cognition, on technological principles, on the logical and descriptive in the presentation of academic disciplines, on understanding, on the principles of creating textbooks for technical universities, etc. Such works contribute to understanding the methodology problems and are used in the implementation of the strategy and tactics of teaching-learning. Thus, these works were reflected, in particular, in the writing of textbooks on the technology of basic organic synthesis, engineering problems of biotechnology, processes and apparatuses of chemical technology.

The problem of borrowing methods and structures from foreign experience adjoins those indicated above. We must understand that there are different conditions and traditions, and remember that we remained competitive in the minds just because we taught differently (not better and not worse, but differently - in accordance with our conditions). And in general, since catching up, adopting the methods of the overtaken, is a purely asymptotic occupation, then only catching up means never catching up. We must also look for our own ways to bypass the developed countries - this, of course, is not easy, since it requires non-linear thinking and decisions. Our higher school must preserve its lofty traditions and ensure progress and development. And foreign experience needs to be studied, to track the best, but not everything needs to be applied and can be applied.

When studying the problem of training a creative person at a university, it is shown that understanding is the basis of creativity (see below); and creativity itself in learning begins when questions become more important than answers (especially ready-made recipes); then the student is constantly faced with a choice already in the course of the teaching itself - this is how doubt is brought up, and with it the desire for a constant play of thought.

The preparation of a creative person is closely related to the scale and level of scientific research at the university. When studying the problem of university science, it is shown that this connection manifests itself in two aspects:

 a teacher who does not conduct scientific or scientific-methodical work runs the risk of becoming a "tutor": he is not tormented by doubts, everything is clear to him from books - he will not want, and will not be able to teach a student to doubt;

 the student in the process of scientific research (especially if it is not applied, but fundamental or exploratory) gradually joins creativity, the game of thought, begins to find satisfaction in it - he has a motivation for non-trivial solutions, for creative searches.

At MITHT, the participation of students in the scientific work of the departments is widespread; starting from the 4th year, such participation becomes mandatory. For many years, the university has traditionally given priority to creative forms of final control: the share of scientific theses and papers with project completion has been steadily at the level of 80-85%. Many students go on to defend their thesis with scientific publications or papers submitted for publication.

The problems of fundamentalization and humanitarization of technical higher education are also common for higher education. It is shown that they cannot be solved by a simple increase in the volume of fundamental disciplines and the opening of new humanitarian courses. They are solved only by the general context, that is, the introduction of elements of fundamental and humanitarian knowledge into all disciplines. The specificity of the influence of humanitarian knowledge on figurative thinking, the basis of intuitive insights, is noted.

Continuous training in mathematics and other disciplines allows you to make students' knowledge more solid. Its implementation can be ensured by the systematic use of elements of this discipline in other courses and

emphasizing in front of students the commonality of patterns and methods of different disciplines. An example of the second way is the balance module developed and implemented at the university; general rules for compiling any balance ratios are established. At the same time, the balance does not require the student to act on a specific recipe, since there is a method.

Among the mathematical studies we present:

 organization of progress (by regulating the level of exactingness in previous and subsequent disciplines);

 analysis of the kinetics of information transfer during the educational process (allows to formulate the principles of the distribution of teachers by student groups);

 a model of rational recruitment of student groups (in order to increase the overall success of the exercise, it is advisable to complete groups of students of different abilities and motivation);

 memory model (the kinetics of forgetting the received portion of information is described; a qualitative analysis of the forgetting phenomenon leads to specific conclusions and recommendations that are useful and used in MITHT to optimize the class schedule and organize students' independent work).

Some didactic aspects of the educational process were studied - by the methods of expert assessments of teachers (departments) and impersonal questioning of students. It has been established: the departments in their assessments show what the situation should be, the students - what it really is.

The complexity of disciplines for students was taken into account in MITHT when developing labor intensity quotas, regulating the number and forms of boundary control measures for disciplines, scheduling classes and exams, and standardizing a number of positions of teaching work.

The nature of the work of students (for understanding, for memorization, mixed) is important when choosing methods for presenting material and controlling students' knowledge. Reliable information about this characteristic can play a significant role in the transition from purely informative (descriptive) teaching methods to methods based on the systematization and classification of educational material, causal relationships. Awareness of the situation in specific subjects after the first surveys led to positive changes - strengthening the work of students on understanding.

In the eyes of students, the strength of interdisciplinary connections is noticeably weaker than it should be in the opinion of the departments. The result is unnecessary expenditure of time and effort during study, difficulties in subsequent activities. Establishment and understanding of these connections in their importance, at least on a par with the amount of information perceived by students. Students often do not feel the commonality of approaches and techniques in different disciplines (or in different sections of the same discipline), it is very important to identify all these connections for the student. For this, it is necessary that subsequent (also related) disciplines use and emphasize the materials and methods of the previous ones, rely on them. Only in this way is truly continuous training of students in different areas possible.

Particular attention is paid to the problem of independent work of students: its importance has increased significantly in recent years and, obviously, will increase in the future. The first step in its rationalization is to study the time budget of students during the academic semester and during the examination period.

sessions (for individual disciplines, for individual types of work). The conducted research allowed.

 streamline the amount of material in specific disciplines, including those offered to students for self-study (the results of studying the students' time budget are the basis for developing labor quotas);

 to identify periods of low workload of students and their overload in certain weeks of the semester, as well as to establish the main causes of uneven workload of students.

In addition, as a result of studying the time budget, a number of tasks were set, without which it is impossible to rationalize the educational process. One of the most important among them is the problem of intra-semester (terminal) control measures (RCM): it is the debt on the RCM that is the main reason for the untimely receipt of credits by many students before the examination session. without the knowledge of the methodological management, the department has no right to leave), semester schedules of the RCM have been drawn up, “breeding” these events by week of the semester (no more than two RCM in one week).

Time-use studies at MITHT largely confirmed the well-known results of such work in other universities; at the same time, some moments specific to MITHT were also identified. Thus, at the Academy, the volume of independent work of students decreases from the 1st year to the 2nd and increases again in the 3rd, where the most complex disciplines are concentrated at MITHT. Students spend the least time on extracurricular independent work on Saturday (on Sunday, on average, they study at home no less than on other days of the week), then on Thursday. During the session, not only the day of the previous exam falls out of active preparation (this is natural), but often the next day; the number of such "lost" days increases from the 1st course to the 3rd.

An important result of the study of the time budget was the establishment of the actual number of hours (on average and their distribution among students) spent by students preparing for exams in each general discipline. This information was used in the scheduling of exams.

The greatest time for independent work is spent (not counting diploma students) students of the 1st year. Part of these costs can be reduced by accelerating the adaptation of first-year students at the university. To this end, at the academy, from the first days of study, students are taught the culture of mental work, its individual methods. Since one of the main difficulties for those entering the university is the inability to take notes of lectures and educational literature in a quality manner, first-year students are introduced to the basics of abbreviated notation developed at MITHT. These questions were originally presented to students in an introductory lecture or as part of the course "Introduction to the specialty"; For the past few years, he has been teaching a separate course on the Fundamentals of Intellectual Activity. MITHT has published a brochure on these issues.

In recent years, the problem of teacher workload has become increasingly important and acute, since the traditions and current standards of teaching work do not take into account the significant changes that are continuously taking place in the educational process. As a result, the load of the teacher, who carefully and with full dedication fulfills his educational, scientific and other duties, is constantly growing, which interferes with the normal course of the educational process. At MITHT, the problem of workload was clarified in the study of the teacher's time budget.

The main sources of teacher overload were studied. It turned out that the increase in the teaching load (and it can be 20-40% higher than the nominal one fixed in the individual plans of the teacher) is mainly due to:

 at general departments - by repeated and control measures (retake by students of current and boundary tests, colloquia; correction of homework; working out of laboratories; repeated passing of exams and tests);

 at major departments – by strengthening individual contacts of the teacher with senior students, especially when they carry out scientific research (at MITHT students start mass scientific work from the fourth year; almost all theses and projects are of a real nature).

And although it is hardly possible to get rid of the overload of teachers in the current conditions, nevertheless, knowledge of its main causes and sources allows the university management to regulate the overload to a certain extent, making it more uniform.

One of the important directions of NMR is the study of the quality of educational activities of departments and individual teachers. After all, the level of construction of the educational process in a particular discipline (primarily, apparently, the quality of lectures), the emotionality and thoughtfulness of the organization of contacts between the teacher and students depend on the mood of students to study this discipline and the intensity of their extracurricular independent work, and hence the success of training.

The study of the quality of training sessions is carried out at MITHT (along with internal inspection by the leadership of the institute, faculties, departments) by analyzing the opinions of different groups of students about their satisfaction with the teaching of various disciplines (in general and for certain types of work). In the course of surveys, students not only characterize the quality of the educational process, but also justify their assessments, point out the specific advantages and disadvantages of lectures, practical classes, course assignments, industrial practice; students' remarks are usually addressed to specific disciplines and individuals. Note that in MITHT, when identifying students' opinions, they are not limited to problems of the quality of education; at the same time, other aspects of the educational process are clarified - organizational, didactic, psychological. The ongoing research allows maintaining a fairly close feedback during training, timely identifying bottlenecks and shortcomings of individual lecturers, teachers and taking measures to eliminate the negative aspects that have arisen.

Substantive knowledge of the formulation of the educational process in different departments allows you to specifically set the tasks of improving the qualifications of teachers. This problem is particularly acute in technical universities, where teachers (specialists in their field of knowledge) in most cases do not have any systematic pedagogical training and comprehend the pedagogical trade on their mistakes and the experience (well, if successful) of their colleagues. It is shown that the internship of teachers of general departments at major departments and vice versa, or at an adjacent department is very useful. This makes it possible to really ensure continuous training of students in areas (mathematical, engineering, chemical, economic, etc.), to exclude irrational duplication of sections and questions in different courses, and it is better to link the latter with each other. Even an internship at your own department can be useful (mastery of related courses, especially in special disciplines, which will have a beneficial effect on both the scientific and pedagogical qualifications of teachers).

The above studies, of course, do not exhaust the list of SMRs conducted at MITHT. Outside of the article, for example, were the results of studying a number of general (continuity; features of university science; professional qualities of teachers; educational work at a university, principles for constructing and delivering lectures, etc.) and private (say, individualization laboratory work carried out by a team of students) problems that are to some extent embodied in the university. Work in the field of intensification of educational and research work of students, rational organization of term papers and theses, etc., does not stop at MITHT. Along with other studies, they are designed to maintain a high level of the educational process, to ensure a decent quality of training.

A very interesting article by Professor Alexander Yudelevich Zackheim about the professor's attitude towards students.

Zakgeim A.Yu. About the relationship of the teacher to the student

Zakheim insists that the teacher must love his students, each and every one. A teacher who does not like students is professionally unsuitable. He says: “I knew such - erudite, conscientious, but not loving or even hating students. And the students always responded to them in return. For such a teacher, every lecture, every practical lesson is an exit to the scaffold. And with all their erudition, they could not give students anything but disgust for this subject. It has always been a mystery to me why they work at the university.

But the requirement of love for students is very difficult: you need to love everyone - both strong and weak, and exemplary, and lazy ... Here both the Christian and the unbeliever shine the precepts of Jesus: love your neighbor and even love your enemies. It is often objected to me: let's love good students, but why love a bad student or a student who has committed a bad deed? I will answer this way: what if my son commits a bad deed? It is my duty to condemn him severely; but love will not disappear, it will express itself in heartache. Any real teacher experiences such pain from time to time.

I know of one exception. If I am convinced that this student is not worthy of studying at a university, I will insist on his expulsion. But this happens very rarely. I will love the rest. And for love - a generous reward. Every time you go to the students, you feel joy.

The next important question. The student should be respected. Even a loved one is sometimes treated as a cute unintelligent. A student is not allowed. The presumption of the mind of the student is very important. At the beginning of communication, I must proceed from the fact that he is, of course, less experienced than I am in my science. But he's not dumber than me. Subsequently, alas, I can be convinced that he is still not smart enough; but it's terrible if I start from the beginning to consider students as fools, obliged to respectfully listen to me, the wise one. And it’s great if, during the educational process, the teacher alternates his positions in relation to the student: “from above” (the teacher teaches, students study), “on an equal footing” (the teacher and students solve the problem together) and “from below” (the student’s thoughts are new to the teacher , and he moves to the position of the student).

Furthermore. The teacher must be internally prepared for the fact that some student will be smarter than himself.

Psychologically, this is a difficult situation. Once I formulated it this way: the bitter goal of the teacher is to become more stupid than his students. True, Viktor Gertsevich immediately suggested a softened version: I'm not stupider than my students, but they are smarter than me. But the essence is the same. By the way, Einstein himself was looking forward to the appearance of students whose scientific achievements would be no lower than his own, and as soon as one of the young people showed good abilities, he began to take care of such a person in every possible way and be proud of him. And I confess: when my former student reaches a level in his work that is inaccessible to me, I am annoyed that this is so, and I am glad that there is at least a drop laid by me in the foundation of his success.

By the way, it is very important not to try to hide from students something that no teacher is insured against: cases when we make mistakes. Moreover, exposing one's own mistakes can be a powerful didactic device. It is only important to understand: it is fruitful to talk about your mistakes when you try very hard not to make them. However, I am not empty of a joking thought that I sometimes express to students: the important difference between a smart person and a fool is that a smart person hits his forehead several times a day and says: “What a fool I am!” A fool would never say that to himself.

In conclusion, I repeat once again: probably, none of us manages to always keep up to the height of the expressed demands. But even here, as an atheist, the position of Christian teaching is close to me: a person, due to his weakness, cannot help but sin; but his duty is to fight the sins in his soul and do what is right as often as possible.”

The conference also discussed the problem of adaptation of first-year students to study in new conditions for them, the problem of adaptation of undergraduates,the question of how education and upbringing at a university should be connected, the problem of actualizing the “internal experience” of a person in the process of his worldview (and, more broadly, spiritual) development was identified.

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Hosted at http://www.allbest.ru/

Tutorial

Pedagogy and psychology of higher education

Chapter 1. Modern development education in Russia and abroad

6. Educational component in vocational education

7. Informatization of the educational process

Chapter 2. Pedagogy as a science

1. The subject of pedagogical science. Its main categories

2. The system of pedagogical sciences and the relationship of pedagogy with other sciences

Chapter 3

1. General concept of didactics

2. Essence, structure and driving forces of learning

3. Principles of teaching as the main guideline in teaching

4. Teaching methods in higher education

Chapter 4

1. Pedagogical act as an organizational and managerial activity

2. Self-awareness of the teacher and the structure of pedagogical activity

3. Pedagogical abilities and pedagogical skills of a teacher of higher education

4. Didactics and pedagogical skills of a teacher of higher education

Chapter 5. Forms of organization of the educational process in higher education

2. Seminars and practical classes at the Higher School

3. Independent work of students as the development and self-organization of the personality of students

4. Fundamentals of pedagogical control in higher education

Chapter 6. Pedagogical Design and Pedagogical Technologies

1. Stages and forms of pedagogical design

2. Classification of technologies for teaching higher education

3. Modular construction of the content of the discipline and rating control

4. Intensification of learning and problem-based learning

5. Active learning

6. Business game as a form of active learning

7. Heuristic learning technologies

8. Technology of sign-context learning

9. Developmental learning technologies

10. Information technology education

11. Technologies of distance education

Chapter 7

Chapter 8

Chapter 9

Part 2. PSYCHOLOGY OF THE HIGHER SCHOOL

Chapter 1. Features of the development of the student's personality

Chapter 2. Typology of student and teacher personality

Chapter 3. Psychological and pedagogical study of the student's personality

Chapter 4. Psychology of vocational education

1. Psychological foundations of professional self-determination

2. Psychological correction of the student's personality with a compromise choice of profession

3. Psychology of professional development of personality

4. Psychological features of student learning

5. Problems of improving academic performance and reducing student dropout

6. Psychological foundations for the formation of professional systems thinking

7. Psychological features of education of students and the role of student groups

Bibliography

Part 1. PEDAGOGY OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Chapter 1. MODERN DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATION IN RUSSIA AND ABROAD

1. The role of higher education in modern civilization

In modern society, education has become one of the most extensive areas of human activity. It employs more than a billion students and almost 50 million teachers. The social role of education has noticeably increased: the prospects for the development of mankind today largely depend on its orientation and effectiveness. In the last decade, the world has changed its attitude towards all types of education. Education, especially higher education, is regarded as the main, leading factor in social and economic progress. The reason for such attention lies in the understanding that the most important value and the main capital of modern society is a person capable of searching for and mastering new knowledge and making non-standard decisions.

In the mid 60s. advanced countries have come to the conclusion that scientific and technological progress is not capable of solving the most acute problems of society and the individual, a deep contradiction is revealed between them. Thus, for example, the colossal development of the productive forces does not ensure the minimum necessary level of well-being for hundreds of millions of people; the ecological crisis has acquired a global character, creating a real threat of total destruction of the habitat of all earthlings; ruthlessness in relation to the plant and animal world turns a person into a cruel, spiritless creature.

In recent years, the limitations and dangers of the further development of mankind through purely economic growth and an increase in technical power, as well as the fact that future development is more determined by the level of culture and wisdom of man, have become more and more real in recent years. According to Erich Fromm, development will be determined not so much by what a person has, but by who he is, what he can do with what he has.

All this makes it absolutely obvious that in overcoming the crisis of civilization, in solving the most acute global problems of mankind, a huge role should be played by education. "Now it is generally recognized," says one of the documents of UNESCO (State of World Education Report 1991, Paris, 1991), "that policies aimed at combating poverty, reducing child mortality and improving the health of society, protecting the environment, strengthening human rights, improving international understanding and enriching national culture will not work without an appropriate education strategy.

It should be emphasized that almost all developed countries carried out reforms of national education systems of various depths and scales, investing huge financial resources in them. Higher education reforms have acquired the status of state policy, because states have begun to realize that the level of higher education in a country determines its future development. In line with this policy, issues related to the growth of the contingent of students and the number of universities, the quality of knowledge, the new functions of higher education, the quantitative growth of information and the spread of new information technologies, etc. were resolved.

But at the same time, in the last 10-15 years, problems that cannot be resolved within the framework of reforms, i.e. within the framework of traditional methodological approaches, and more and more often they talk about the global crisis of education. The existing educational systems do not fulfill their function - to form a creative force, the creative forces of society. In 1968, the American scientist and educator F. G. Coombs, perhaps for the first time, gave an analysis of the unresolved problems of education: show through to the same extent in all countries - developed and developing, rich and poor, who have long been famous for their educational institutions or create them now with great difficulty. Almost 20 years later, in his new book "A View from the 80s," he also concludes that the crisis in education has worsened and that the general situation in the field of education has become even more alarming.

The statement of the crisis in education has moved from scientific literature to official documents and statements of statesmen.

A report from the US National Commission on Educational Quality paints a bleak picture: "We have committed an act of insane educational disarmament. We are raising a generation of Americans illiterate in science and technology." The opinion of former French President Giscard d'Estaing is also interesting: "I think that the main failure of the Fifth Republic is that it was unable to satisfactorily solve the problem of education and upbringing of young people."

The crisis of Western European and American education has also become a topic fiction. Examples include a series of novels about Wilt by the English satirist Tom Sharp, or the novel The Fourth Vertebra by the Finnish writer Marty Larney.

In domestic science, until recently, the very concept of "global education crisis" was rejected. According to Soviet scientists, the educational crisis seemed possible only abroad, "with them." It was believed that "in our country" we can only talk about "difficulties of growth." Today, no one disputes the existence of a crisis in the domestic education system. On the contrary, there is a tendency to analyze and define its symptoms and ways out of a crisis situation.

1 Gershunsky B. S. Russia: education and the future. The Crisis of Education in Russia on the Threshold of the 21st Century. M., 1993; Shukshunov V. E., Taken to the neck V. F., Romanova L. I. Through the development of education to the new Russia. M., 1993; and etc.

Analyzing the complex and capacious concept of the "crisis of education", the authors emphasize that it is by no means identical to the absolute decline. The Russian higher school objectively occupied one of the leading positions, it has a number of advantages, which will be highlighted below.

The essence of the global crisis is seen primarily in the orientation of the current system of education (the so-called supportive education) to the past, its orientation to past experience, in the absence of orientation to the future. This idea is clearly seen in the brochure by V.E. Shukshunova, V.F. Vzyatysheva, L.I. Romankova and in the article by O.V. Dolzhenko "Useless thoughts, or once again about education".

1 Philosophy of education for the XXI century. M., 1992.

The modern development of society requires a new system of education - "innovative education", which would form in students the ability to projectively determine the future, responsibility for it, faith in themselves and their professional abilities to influence this future.

In our country, the crisis of education has a dual nature. First, it is a manifestation of the global education crisis. Secondly, it takes place in an environment and under the powerful influence of the crisis of the state, the entire socio-economic and socio-political system. Many are wondering whether it is right to start reforms in education, in particular higher education, right now, in the conditions of such a difficult historical situation in Russia? The question arises whether they are needed at all, because the higher school in Russia, no doubt, has a number of advantages in comparison with higher schools in the USA and Europe? Before answering this question, let's list the positive "developments" of the Russian higher education:

* it is capable of training personnel in almost all areas of science, technology and production;

* in terms of the scale of training of specialists and the availability of personnel, it occupies one of the leading places in the world;

* has a high level of fundamental training, in particular in the natural sciences;

* traditionally focused on professional activities and has a close relationship with practice.

These are the advantages of the Russian educational system (higher education).

However, it is also clearly recognized that the reform of higher education in our country is an urgent need. The changes taking place in society are increasingly objectifying the shortcomings of domestic higher education, which we once considered as its advantages:

* in modern conditions, the country needs such specialists who not only are not "graduating" today, but for the training of which our educational system has not yet created a scientific and methodological basis;

* free training of specialists and incredibly low pay for their work devalued the value of higher education, its elitism in terms of developing the intellectual level of the individual; its status, which should provide the individual with a certain social role and material support;

* excessive enthusiasm for professional training was to the detriment of the overall spiritual and cultural development of the individual;

* an average approach to the individual, the gross output of "engineering products", the lack of demand for decades of intelligence, talent, morality, professionalism led to the degradation of moral values, to the de-intellectualization of society, and the decline in the prestige of a highly educated person. This fall materialized in a galaxy of Moscow and other janitors with a university education, as a rule, extraordinary personalities;

* totalitarian management of education, over-centralization, unification of requirements suppressed the initiative and responsibility of the teaching corps;

* due to the militarization of society, the economy and education, a technocratic idea of ​​the social role of specialists, disrespect for nature and man has formed;

* isolation from the world community, on the one hand, and the work of many industries based on foreign models, import purchases of entire plants and technologies, on the other hand, distorted the main function of an engineer - the creative development of fundamentally new equipment and technology;

* economic stagnation, the crisis of the transition period led to a sharp decline in both financial and material support for education, higher education in particular.

Today, these negative characteristics have become especially aggravated and supplemented by a number of other quantitative ones, emphasizing the crisis state of higher education in Russia:

* there is a steady downward trend in the number of students (for 10 years the number of students has decreased by 200 thousand);

* the existing system of higher education does not provide the population of the country with the same opportunities to study at universities;

* there was a sharp reduction in the number of teaching staff of higher education (most of them leave to work in other countries) and much more.

It should be emphasized that the Government of Russia is making considerable efforts aimed at the successful reform of higher education. In particular, the main attention is paid to the restructuring of the higher education management system, namely:

* broad development of forms of self-government;

* direct participation of universities in the development and implementation of state educational policy;

* providing universities with broader rights in all areas of their activities;

* expansion of academic freedoms for teachers and students.

In the intellectual circles of Russia, the possible consequences of the gradual curtailment of education and the decrease in the social protection of students and teachers are becoming increasingly clear. There comes an understanding that the unlawful spread of market forms of activity to the sphere of education, ignoring the specific nature of the educational process can lead to the loss of the most vulnerable components of social wealth - scientific and methodological experience and traditions of creative activity.

So, the main tasks of reforming the system of higher education are reduced to solving the problem of both a substantive and organizational and managerial nature, the development of a balanced state policy, its orientation towards the ideals and interests of a renewed Russia. And yet, what is the main link, the core, the basis for bringing Russian education out of the crisis?

Obviously, the problem of the long-term development of higher education cannot be solved only through reforms of an organizational, managerial and substantive nature.

In this regard, the question of the need to change the paradigm of education is becoming more and more persistent.

We focused on the concept developed by the scientists of the International Academy of Sciences of Higher Education (ANHS) V. E. Shukshunov, V. F. Vzyatyshev and others. In their opinion, the scientific origins of the new educational policy should be sought in three areas: about man and society and the "theory of practice" (Scheme 1.2).

The philosophy of education should give a new idea about the place of a person in the modern world, about the meaning of his being, about the social role of education in solving the key problems of mankind.

The sciences of man and society (psychology of education, sociology, etc.) are needed in order to have a modern scientific presentation about the patterns of human behavior and development, as well as a model of interactions between people within the educational system and the education system itself - with society.

The "theory of practice", including modern pedagogy, social design, management of the education system, etc., will provide an opportunity to present a new education system in the aggregate: to determine the goals, structures of the system, the principles of its organization and management. It will also be a tool for reforming and adapting the education system to the changing conditions of life.

So, the fundamental foundations of the development of education are indicated. What are the directions of development of the proposed paradigm of education?

The proposed methodology can be called humanistic, since it is centered on a person, his spiritual development, and a system of values. In addition, the new methodology, which is the basis of the educational process, sets the task of forming moral and volitional qualities, creative freedom of the individual.

In this regard, the problem of humanization and humanitarization of education is quite clearly realized, which, with the new methodology, acquires a much deeper meaning than just introducing a person to humanitarian culture.

The point is that it is necessary to humanize the activities of professionals. And for this you need:

* Firstly, to reconsider the meaning of the concept of "fundamentalization of education", giving it a new meaning and including the science of man and society in the main knowledge base. In Russia, this is far from an easy problem;

* secondly, the formation of systemic thinking, a unified vision of the world without division into "physicists" and "lyricists" will require a counter movement and rapprochement of the parties. Technical activity needs to be humanized. But the humanities should also take steps towards mastering the universal values ​​accumulated in the scientific and technical sphere. It was the gap in technical and humanitarian training that led to the impoverishment of the humanitarian content of the educational process, the decrease in the creative and cultural level of a specialist, economic and legal nihilism, and ultimately to a decrease in the potential of science and production. The well-known psychologist V.P. Zinchenko defined the devastating impact of technocratic thinking on human culture as follows: "For technocratic thinking, there are no categories of morality, conscience, human experience and dignity." Usually, when talking about the humanization of engineering education, they mean only an increase in the share of humanitarian disciplines in the curricula of the university. At the same time, students are offered various art history and other humanitarian disciplines, which is rarely directly related to the future activity of an engineer. But this is the so-called "external humanitarianization." We emphasize that among the scientific and technical intelligentsia, the technocratic style of thinking dominates, which students “absorb” into themselves from the very beginning of their studies at the university. Therefore, they treat the study of the humanities as something secondary, sometimes showing outright nihilism.

Recall once again that the essence of the humanization of education is seen primarily in the formation of a culture of thinking, the creative abilities of a student based on a deep understanding of the history of culture and civilization, the entire cultural heritage. The university is designed to prepare a specialist capable of constant self-development, self-improvement, and the richer his nature is, the brighter it will manifest itself in professional activities. If this problem is not solved, then, as the Russian philosopher G. P. Fedotov wrote in 1938, “... there is the prospect of an industrial, powerful, but soulless and soulless Russia ... Naked soulless power is the most consistent expression of Cain's God-damned civilization."

So, the main directions of the reform of Russian education should be a turn towards a person, an appeal to his spirituality, the fight against scientism, technocratic snobbery, and the integration of private sciences.

At the same time, the Russian program for the development of education should contain mechanisms that guarantee:

* unity of the federal educational space;

* open perception and understanding of the entire palette of world cultural, historical and educational experience.

The main lines for the withdrawal of Russian education from the crisis have been determined; possible options for implementing the education reform have been developed. It remains only to bring education to a level that will give a new vision of the world, new creative thinking.

2. The place of the technical university in the Russian educational space

The implementation of the ideas of reforming higher education requires an adequate change in the types of higher educational institutions. In this regard, a number of Russian polytechnic universities received the status of technical universities, which are subject to high requirements. In the history of the national higher education, a number of prototypes of technical universities can be distinguished. One of the representatives of technical universities are universities that historically approached the heights of university education through the created engineering products. Among such universities is the Moscow Technical University, known for its fundamental nature and high ranking at the world level. Other types of universities are represented by polytechnic institutes, which were created on the idea of ​​Yu. S. Witte as technical universities. Among these universities are the oldest polytechnic universities in Russia - SRSTU (NPI) and St. Petersburg State Technical University. The group of technical universities that have recently received this status has historically evolved as a number of sectoral and sometimes multi-sectoral universities, which, due to their development, have become centers of science, education and culture, where education is combined with scientific research.

The Technical University is an elementary educational institution both in terms of the preparedness of teaching staff and in terms of the level of intellectual development of students. Anyone can enter the university on a competitive basis. However, if difficulties of an intellectual or any other nature make it impossible to continue studying in this educational institution, then the developed mechanisms of socially acceptable selection, a flexible educational system, the leading link of which is the university, allow people who left it to complete their education in another educational institution.

Therefore, the technical university is being formed as a leading link in continuous professional education in the region, uniting functionally educational establishments various levels. The exchange of students between these institutions encourages the university to create a much more flexible system of the educational process, capable of assimilating the influx of students from other educational institutions and purposefully producing an outflow of students to other educational institutions. One of the ways to solve this problem is to create a multi-level system of fundamental education in each of the enlarged areas of science and technology, the levels of which correspond to the different quality of education and determine the student's choice of further educational path at the university or beyond.

3. Fundamentalization of education in higher education

The turn of the millennium is considered by modern world science as a transitional period from an industrial civilization to a post-industrial civilization. As the past two decades and ever more clearly emerging trends show, the main features of the post-industrial development of the world community and the new technological mode of production are:

* humanization of technology, manifested both in the structure and in the nature of its application; the production of equipment that satisfies the needs of man, giving labor a more creative character is increasing;

* increasing the science intensity of production, the priority of high-tech technical systems using the achievements of fundamental science;

* miniaturization of technology, deconcentration of production, programmed for a quick response due to rapidly changing technologies and demand for products;

* ecologization of production, strict environmental standards, the use of waste-free and low-waste technologies, the integrated use of natural raw materials and their replacement with synthetic ones;

* simultaneous localization and internationalization of production based on local technical systems, exchange finished products; strengthening integration ties between regions and countries focused on meeting demand, which in turn increases the mobility of the population and the opportunities for specialists to work in different regions and countries.

All this taken together dictates new requirements for the education system, including the strengthening of its humanitarian and fundamental components, the proportion of the processes of fundamentalization and humanization of higher professional education increases, the need for the integration of fundamental, humanitarian, special knowledge increases, providing a comprehensive vision of the specialist of his professional activity. in the context of upcoming technological and social changes.

The core of the post-industrial technological mode of production are three interrelated basic areas - microelectronics, computer science and biotechnology. However, all achievements in these fields of science should be based on noospheric thinking, universal human values, protection of the human personality from the negative consequences of technologization.

The upbringing of a multidimensional creative personality in a university should be implemented through the optimal combination of fundamental, humanitarian and professional blocks of disciplines, their interpenetration based on interdisciplinary connections, integrated courses, interdisciplinary forms of control that ensure the formation of a holistic consciousness based on systemic knowledge.

The relevance of the fundamentalization of higher education

The training of highly qualified professionals is always the most important task of higher education. However, at present, this task is no longer possible to fulfill without the fundamentalization of education. This is explained by the fact that scientific and technological progress has turned the fundamental sciences into a direct, permanent and most efficient driving force of production, which applies not only to the latest high technology, but also to any modern production.

It is the results of fundamental research that ensure a high rate of development of production, the emergence of completely new branches of technology, the saturation of production with measuring, research, control, modeling and automation tools that were previously used exclusively in specialized laboratories. The achievements of such areas of knowledge as relativistic physics, quantum mechanics, biology, laser and plasma physics, elementary particle physics, etc., which were previously considered very far from practice, are increasingly being involved in production. More and more fundamental theories are beginning to be used for practical purposes, transforming into engineering theories. The competitiveness of the most prosperous firms is largely ensured by fundamental developments in research laboratories at firms, at universities, in various scientific and technical centers up to powerful industrial parks. More and more fundamental research initially provides for reaching specific applied and commercial goals.

In addition, the fundamentalization of education effectively contributes to the formation of creative engineering thinking, a clear idea of ​​the place of one's profession in the system of universal knowledge and practice.

If the university does not develop the ability of its graduates to master the achievements of the fundamental sciences and creatively use them in engineering activities, then it will not provide its students with the necessary competitiveness in the labor market. Therefore, in a modern technical university, from the very first year, the desire of students for a deep mastery of fundamental knowledge should be cultivated.

Over the past 2-3 decades, a new scientific direction has finally taken shape on the basis of the fundamental sciences - modern natural science. He built an all-embracing, theoretically substantiated, in many parts empirically confirmed model of the Universe with powerful predictive power. Built with this model modern painting The world has eliminated the shortcomings of previous similar constructions and continues to improve. It gives a person a clear idea of ​​the world in which he lives, of his place and role in this world. On the basis of the cosmological principle of the unity of everything inanimate, living and thinking, she successfully created a scientific basis for high morality, based on solid knowledge, and not on shaky faith. As a result, the modern scientific picture of the world, built by fundamental sciences, has become an integral part of human culture, greatly strengthening the relationship between the spheres of culture and science within the framework of modern civilization. Therefore, the connection between the humanitarian and fundamental components of higher technical education should be strengthened accordingly. Only on this basis will the higher school be able to form the high personal qualities of the graduate, which he needs for fruitful professional activity in modern conditions.

Initial theoretical positions

The idea of ​​the unity of the world, manifested in the universal interconnection in the sphere of the inanimate, living, spiritual, is taken as the initial theoretical position of the fundamentalization of education. The unity of the world is manifested in the unity of the cultural, scientific and practical spheres of civilization and, as a result, in the organic connections of natural sciences, the humanities, and technical sciences. These connections must inevitably be reflected in the models of specialists, curricula, programs, textbooks and the organization of the educational process. This implies the need to form a new model of the education system at a technical university, which is based on rethinking the relationship between fundamental and technical components, the formation of a multi-level integration of technical and fundamental knowledge.

The fundamental sciences are natural Sciences(i.e. the sciences of nature in all its manifestations) - physics, chemistry, biology, the sciences of space, earth, man, etc., as well as mathematics, computer science and philosophy, without which a deep understanding of knowledge about nature is impossible.

In the educational process, each fundamental science has its own discipline, which is called fundamental.

Fundamental knowledge is knowledge about nature contained in the fundamental sciences (and fundamental disciplines).

Fundamentalization of higher education is a systematic and comprehensive enrichment of the educational process with fundamental knowledge and methods of creative thinking developed by the fundamental sciences.

Since the vast majority of applied sciences arose and develops on the basis of the use of the laws of nature, almost all engineering disciplines have a fundamental component. The same can be said about many humanities. Therefore, almost all disciplines studied by a student during their studies at a university should be involved in the process of fundamentalization. A similar thought is true for humanitarization. The foregoing underlies the fundamental possibility and practical expediency of integrating the humanitarian, fundamental and professional components of an engineer's training.

The fundamentalization of higher education presupposes its constant enrichment with the achievements of the fundamental sciences.

Fundamental sciences cognize nature, while applied sciences create something new, moreover, exclusively on the basis of the fundamental laws of nature.

The fact that applied sciences arise and develop on the basis of the constant use of the fundamental laws of nature makes general professional and special disciplines also carriers of fundamental knowledge. Consequently, in the process of fundamentalization of higher education, along with the natural sciences, general professional and special disciplines should be involved.

This approach will ensure the fundamentalization of student learning at all stages from the first to the fifth year.

The realities of post-industrial civilization and new value orientations of Russian education

In the social structure of the world community of the XXI century. one of the basic social groups will include workers in the sphere of reproduction - workers, technicians, programmers, scientists, designers, engineers, teachers, employees. As can be seen from the above list, most of it is graduates. Political relations adequate to the post-industrial civilization and changes in the state-legal sphere create prerequisites for the participation of social groups in public life up to entry into the management of state structures.

In the transition period, the role of the individual increases, the processes of humanization of society are activated as a guarantor of its survival in the conditions of the crisis of industrial civilization. All this cannot but affect the formation of priority areas and value orientations higher professional education.

4. Humanization and humanization of education in higher education

The value dominants of Russian education, actualized in the professional and social activities of specialists, are determined by the realities of the transition period from the crisis of industrial to the formation of post-industrial civilization.

* Thus, the development of high technologies, their rapid change presupposes the priority development of the creative and projective abilities of students.

* The decrease in the intellectual potential of science requires an increase in the quality of training of specialists, its fundamentalization.

* The general environmental crisis sets before education, and especially engineering, the task of changing the general environmental consciousness, educating professional morality and orienting specialists towards the development and application of environmentally friendly technologies and industries.

* The information revolution and the transformation of society into an information society dictate the need to form the information culture of students, information protection from the harmful effects of the media and at the same time require strengthening the information orientation of the content of education and the widespread introduction of information technologies in the educational process.

* The lag in the pace of development of public consciousness from the speed of development of global problems of mankind requires the alignment of their dynamics, in particular through the education system, the formation of planetary thinking among students, the introduction of new disciplines, such as system modeling, synergetics, forecasting, global studies, etc.

* Alignment of the dynamics of the technological and social development of society is associated primarily with the formation of a new worldview paradigm, the rejection of anthropocentrism and the formation of a new holistic worldview, noospheric consciousness, new value orientations based on general humanistic dominants, which in no way contradicts the revival of national identity, but only cleanses it of chauvinistic and nationalist accretions.

* All these processes primarily concern the education system and are directly related to the strengthening of the educational component of education, the spiritual and moral education of young people through knowledge and beliefs.

The role of the educational component of Russian vocational education is especially high, because it is he who will become protective system society capable of instilling in generations of specialists of the XXI century. moral qualities necessary for the future successful development of the Russian state.

The negative consequences of Russia's rapid and sudden entry into the market, the collapse of a totalitarian society and its moral values ​​have activated among the youth such negative social phenomena as egocentrism, group egoism, moral inferiority, a social inferiority complex, a sharp drop in the scale of moral values, disbelief in social progress, uncertainty, etc.

Such moods of the students will have to be overcome by the teaching corps of higher education, intensifying educational work with students.

Today there are no social instruments, youth organizations dealing directly with the problems of education. Education should permeate the educational process. Its content and procedural characteristics should correspond to the new educational paradigm, strategy and tactics for the development of Russian education.

Every teacher today needs personal and professional habilitation* to make adjustments to their activities or develop a fundamentally new individual pedagogical trajectory.

* The term "habilitation" from the French "habile" - skillful, dexterous, skillful. It means the acquisition of qualifications that meet modern requirements.

All of the above confirms the importance of humanization and humanitarization of higher education.

The essence of the concepts of "humanization" and "humanization"

The humanization of education is understood as the process of creating conditions for self-realization, self-determination of the student's personality in the space of modern culture, the creation of a humanitarian sphere at the university that contributes to the disclosure of the creative potential of the individual, the formation of noospheric thinking, value orientations and moral qualities, followed by their actualization in professional and social activities.

The humanization of education, especially technical education, involves expanding the list of humanitarian disciplines, deepening the integration of their content in order to obtain systemic knowledge.

Both of these processes are identical, complement each other and should be considered in conjunction, integrating with the processes of fundamentalization of education.

Concepts of humanization and humanitarization at a technical university

Obviously, in technical universities, solving the problem of humanization, it is necessary to achieve the penetration of humanitarian knowledge into the natural sciences and technical disciplines, the enrichment of humanitarian knowledge with natural science and fundamental components. The main provisions of the concept of humanization and humanitarization include:

* an integrated approach to the problems of humanization of education, which involves a turn towards a holistic person and a holistic human being;

* humane technologies for teaching and educating students;

* training on the border of humanitarian and technical spheres (on the border of living and non-living, material and spiritual, biology and technology, technology and ecology, technology and living organisms, technology and society, etc.);

* interdisciplinarity in education;

* the functioning of the cycle of social and humanitarian disciplines in the university as a fundamental, initial educational and system training;

* overcoming of stereotypes of thinking, the statement of humanitarian culture.

What should be the criteria for the humanization of education? Without an answer to this question, it is impossible to start solving the problem of the humanization of Russian education. These criteria are:

1. Mastering universal human values ​​and methods of activity contained in humanitarian knowledge and culture.

2. Mandatory presence of in-depth language training, while the linguistic module becomes an integral part of the entire complex of humanization.

3. Humanitarian disciplines in the total volume of disciplines studied should be at least 15-20% for non-humanitarian educational institutions, and their percentage should increase.

4. Elimination of interdisciplinary gaps both vertically and horizontally.

At present, there are illusory interdisciplinary connections between natural sciences, technical and humanitarian disciplines, on the one hand, and disciplines within the humanities cycle, on the other. In addition, the narrow focus of education has led to the fact that the system of knowledge, skills and abilities of students at all levels (school, colleges, universities) is a conglomerate of loosely connected information about nature, society, man, which are also poorly used by students in practice, in the matter of independent acquisition of knowledge, self-development.

The humanitarization of education involves increased attention to expanding the range of academic disciplines of the humanities cycle and at the same time enriching natural science and technical disciplines with material that reveals the struggle of scientific ideas, the human fate of pioneer scientists, the dependence of socio-economic and scientific and technological progress on the personal, moral qualities of a person, his creative abilities.

Thus, the prospect of updating and updating the humanitarization of education is associated with the interpenetration of the natural sciences and the humanities, on the one hand, and on the other hand, with the strengthening of the role of humanitarian education.

Speaking about the humanization and humanitarization of higher technical education, we must keep in mind that engineering education in the XXI century. must necessarily take into account the new relationship of engineering activity with the environment, society, man, i.e. The activity of an engineer must be humanistic. Because of this, in technical universities and universities, special attention should be paid to the philosophy of technology, since it differs significantly from the philosophy of science. While the philosophy of science ultimately revolves around the question of how to evaluate scientific truth and what is the meaning of this truth, the philosophy of technology revolves around the question of the nature of the artifact, i.e. made by man.

Because of this, the fundamental scientific problem to be comprehended for technical universities is: "What is the nature of what we create, and why do we do it?" And this is one of the tasks of the philosophy of technology. Answering the above questions, the philosophy of technology claims that they must be humane in nature, not be hostile to nature, society, man; they must be harmonized with them.

The creation of such "humanistic" technologies presupposes a change in the view of their creators on the essence of their activity. The only way to change the view of engineers and other workers in the technical field lies through the humanization and humanitarization of education.

Humanitarian knowledge includes the sciences of man, the sciences of society, the sciences of the interaction of man and society, the prognosis of social processes and the development of human nature.

The main focus in the organization of the educational process at universities should be interdisciplinarity in teaching, which is based on the interdisciplinary nature of modern knowledge. There are two main directions here:

1) intensive introduction of humanitarian disciplines into purely technical universities;

2) enrichment of humanitarian specialties and disciplines with the basics of technical and natural science knowledge and vice versa.

This way of learning through an interdisciplinary approach contributes to the formation of globalization and non-standard thinking in students, the ability to solve complex problems emerging at the intersection of different areas, to see the relationship between fundamental research, technology and the needs of production and society, to be able to evaluate the effectiveness of an innovation, to organize its practical implementation.

In the formation of specialists, engineers of a new type, humanitarian training affects the essence of their creative activity, not only in technical, but also in social, environmental and economic spheres. The existing system of education in technical universities in Russia does not give the engineer an understanding of the technologies for effective social interaction and communicative culture.

Until now, in Russia there has been a sharp division and even opposition between the humanitarian and technical spheres of activity, thinking and education. The Russian education system is divided into two weakly interacting parts: humanitarian and technical. This is a painful problem of Russian education, which still cannot be properly solved, which is why the activity of an engineer is practically not fertilized by the humanistic spirit of creativity.

The Technical University of the Future is a humanitarian and technical university, i.е. university of a single culture of mankind, because in the XXI century. there will be a convergence of engineering and humanitarian activities, their new relations with the environment, society, man will be established, there will be a further convergence of biology and technology, living and non-living, spiritual and material. In the future, an engineer cannot do without serious humanitarian training. That is why the humanization of education in general, and especially technical education, is a top priority for Russian higher education. The solution to the problem of humanitarization of education in technical universities of Russia should be carried out in the following directions:

expansion of the range of disciplines of the humanitarian module (see the structure of the main modules of education at a modern technical university);

ensuring the interpenetration of humanitarian knowledge and non-humanitarian disciplines (scientific and technical);

enrichment of natural science and technical disciplines with knowledge that reveals the struggle of scientific ideas, the human fate of pioneer scientists, the dependence of socio-economic and scientific and technological progress on the personal, moral qualities of a person, his creative abilities;

interdisciplinarity in education;

training in solving scientific and technical problems at the border of the technical and humanitarian spheres;

ensuring the possibility for students at a technical university to receive a second humanitarian or socio-economic specialty;

strengthening the training of engineers in the legal, linguistic, environmental, economic, ergonomic fields;

creation of a humanitarian environment at the university;

student-centered learning.

5. Integration processes in modern education

Integration and a systematic approach in the development of modern science

Scientific and technological revolution (NTR), which marked the second half of the bygone XX century. and which was the reason for the transition of mankind from an industrial civilization to a post-industrial one, affected all spheres of life and activity of human society, including education. Its crisis state today indicates that this civilizational link lags behind the entire system in its development. The essence of scientific and technological revolution helps to explain the causes of the education crisis and ways out of it. The main features of the NTR:

* fusion of scientific and technological revolutions; scientific discoveries immediately become the basis of new technologies;

* the transformation of science into a productive force;

* system automation of production;

* replacement in the production of direct human labor by materialized knowledge;

* the emergence of a new type of worker with a qualitatively new level of professional training and thinking;

* transition from extensive to intensive production. But the main feature is that the scientific and technological revolution was formed on the basis of deep systemic ties between science, technology, production and the resulting radical change in the productive forces of society, with the decisive role of science. The basis for the classification of scientific and technological revolution is the activity of the company in the sphere of the three indicated elements of the system. It is closely connected with the social environment and significantly affects all aspects of the life of modern society. Education, culture, human psychology are interconnected and interdependent, representing elements of one system: science - technology - production - society - man - environment. In the process of development, changes occur in all parts of the system. Considering the scientific and technological revolution as a complex self-organizing open system, it is easier to understand the causes of failure in a particular subsystem and the patterns of development that lead to its alignment.

One of the most important consequences of the scientific and technological revolution is the transformation of the personality, its role in scientific and technological progress and in eliminating the negative consequences of the scientific and technological revolution through the creation of a new living environment and the development of other needs, which in turn predetermined the choice of a new, personality-oriented educational paradigm.

The modern revolutionary development of scientific knowledge is characterized by the following features:

* differentiation of sciences is combined with integrative processes, synthesis of scientific knowledge, complexity, transfer of research methods from one area to another;

* only on the basis of integrating the conclusions of private sciences and the results of research by specialists from different fields of knowledge, a comprehensive systemic coverage of a scientific problem is possible;

* sciences are becoming more and more precise due to the widespread use of the mathematical apparatus;

* Modern science is rapidly developing in time and space. The gap between the emergence of a scientific idea and its implementation in production is reduced;

* today scientific achievements are the result of collective activity, the object of public planning and regulation;

* the study of objects and phenomena is carried out systematically, comprehensively; a holistic study of objects contributes to the formation of synthetic thinking.

These features of modern science, where integration and a systematic approach become the main principles of scientific research, help to understand the patterns and prospects for the development of modern education as one of the subsystems of the key element of scientific and technological revolution.

Scientific and technological revolution has led to a change in the goals and meanings of education. In one of the previous sections of the tutorial, we talked about a new educational paradigm. In this context, we will only briefly recall the main goal of modern education, the prognostic one, the training of specialists capable of projective determination of the future, the cultivation of the country's intellectual elite, the formation of a creative personality who perceives the world holistically and is able to actively influence the processes taking place in the social and professional areas.

Back in 1826, J. G. Pestalozzi considered education as a harmonious and balanced development in the process of training and education of all human forces. The modern development of education as a system should be realized through the systemic knowledge necessary for the development of a holistic, systemic thinking. This knowledge can be obtained on the basis of the integration of the humanities, fundamental and technical sciences and must be oriented to the world level of science development.

This approach presupposes, first of all, the multidimensionality and unity of education, the simultaneous and balanced functioning of its three components: education, upbringing, creative development of the individual in their interconnection and interdependence. Modern education needs to develop a new methodology, a global theory, in which all parts of the educational system in their interaction with the community and the individual become the object of study. UNESCO introduced the term "educology", which refers to the methodology of education. The working language of UNESCO is French, and therefore it makes sense to refer to the etymology of this word. In French "education" means "education". Therefore, we can consider educology as the science of upbringing, "nurturing" in the education system, in a holistic creative person who is aware of himself as a subject of activity in the world around him.

Similar Documents

    Basic concepts about the essence and specifics of higher education pedagogy. Modern educational paradigms. Goals and content of higher professional education. Technology of pedagogical interaction as a condition for effective pedagogical activity.

    tutorial, added 04/13/2012

    The essence of higher professional education. Analysis of transformational changes in higher education. Development of a holistic socio-philosophical concept of the development of higher education in its dynamic interaction with society. Purpose and functions of institutions.

    term paper, added 07/24/2014

    The concept and features of psychology as a scientific direction, its objects and methods. Tasks and structure of the psychology of higher education. The main trends and psychological principles of modern education, approaches to this process and evaluation of its effectiveness.

    presentation, added 12/06/2012

    General concept of didactics. The structure of the pedagogical process. Laws and patterns of teaching in higher education. The goals of vocational education. Principles of teaching as the main guideline in teaching.

    lecture, added 04/25/2007

    The goal of humane pedagogy, means of authoritarian education. Postulates of humane pedagogical thinking. Authoritarianism of modern pedagogy. Assumption as a way to create and develop new ideas. Principles of learning according to Zankov. The problem of education of thought.

    abstract, added 06/19/2012

    Education as a priority direction of higher education pedagogy. General characteristics of the main goals of education of students. Analysis of the principles that determine the content of education: social and value orientation, development and formation of personality.

    term paper, added 02/12/2015

    Characteristics and methodological aspects of the concepts of developmental education. Age and psychological dynamics of the student's development in the process of obtaining education at the university. The program of lectures and seminars on the course " General psychology"at the university.

    term paper, added 05/20/2014

    Pedagogical ideas in the education system. The first educational institutions in Russia. Features of the development of higher education between the First and Second World Wars. Modern trends in the development of education abroad and the prospects for Russian higher education.

    term paper, added 05/25/2014

    The essence and structure of pedagogical activity, its main tasks. Personality and professional abilities of a teacher of higher education. Principles and rules of successful education. The concept and purpose of the competence-based approach, styles of pedagogical communication.

Loading...Loading...