Is a compassionate person a moral person? (School essays). Nikolai Nekrasov - Moral Man: Verse

Living according to strict morality,

My wife, covering her face with a veil,
In the evening she went to her lover;
I sneaked into his house with the police
And he convicted ... He called: I did not fight!
She went to bed and died
Tormented by shame and sadness...

I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

I had a daughter; fell in love with the teacher
And I wanted to run away with him in a rush.
I threatened her with a curse: resigned
And she married a gray-haired rich man.
Their house was shiny and full, like a bowl;
But Masha suddenly began to turn pale and go out
And a year later she died in consumption,
Having struck the whole house with deep sadness ...
Living according to strict morality,
I have never harmed anyone in my life...

I gave the peasant as a cook:
He succeeded; good cook- happiness!
But often left the yard
And the name of an indecent predilection
Had: loved to read and reason.
I, tired of threatening and scolding,
Paternally cut him with a canal,
He took it and drowned himself: he found nonsense!
Living according to strict morality,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

My friend didn't show me the loan on time.
I, hinting in a friendly way to him,
The law has given us to judge:
The law sentenced him to prison.
He died in it without paying the altyn,
But I'm not angry, even though there is a reason to be angry!
I forgave him the debt on the same date,
Honoring him with tears and sadness ...
Living according to strict morality,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

Analysis of the poem "Moral Man" by Nekrasov

N. Nekrasov became famous for his works in the genre of civil lyrics, the main motive of which was the denunciation of the main social vices. At the same time, the main theme for the poet was the protection of the lower strata of society. The vast majority of Nekrasov's poems are devoted to the peasantry. But sometimes he dwelled in detail on the description of the representatives of the ruling class. A prime example is the poem " moral man».

The author describes the life and work of a certain "moral man" with a huge dose of sarcasm. In compositional terms, the poem consists of four separate parts devoted to the relationship of the protagonist with completely different people.

In the first part, the "moral man" learns about his wife's infidelity. He exposes her with the help of the police, but refuses to be challenged to a duel. A disgraced woman dies, unable to endure the suffering that has befallen her.

The next act of the protagonist is a trial with a friend who owed him. The debtor was sentenced to imprisonment, in which he died.

The "moral man" taught his serf peasant the art of cooking. "Unfortunately" along with new profession the peasant acquired a craving for knowledge (“he loved to read and reason”). For this, the owner scolded him for a long time and, in the end, subjected him to corporal punishment. "Fool" drowned himself with grief.

The "peak" of the protagonist's morality is his treatment of his own daughter. The girl fell in love with a poor teacher, and a prudent father forced her to marry a more preferable "gray-haired rich man." "Happy" family life did not last long. The daughter began to quickly “turn pale and fade away” and died a year after the wedding.

Nekrasov does not blame his main character for anything. It leaves the verdict to the readers. The "moral man" himself is firmly convinced of his infallibility. He proves this with the help of a refrain repeated several times: "Living in accordance with strict morality, I have done no harm to anyone in my life."

The whole horror of the situation lies precisely in the fact that such a view was characteristic of the vast majority of the nobility. Nekrasov, of course, created a collective image of a scoundrel, but in general his actions do not contradict the so-called "strict morality." All victims received what they deserved. The wife cheated on her husband, the friend did not repay the debt, the peasant dared to contradict the owner, and the daughter got out of parental obedience. A "moral person" does not feel sorry for these sinners. He himself is "pure" before God. The only thing that confuses him is the "deep sadness" in the house after Masha's death.

Morality and corresponding moral norms are the basis of civilization and humanity of any society. When morality and moral foundations collapse, society collapses and a person degrades, which we can also observe in our modern civilization, which is increasingly drowning in.

- this is following certain Spiritual (moral) Principles: the principles of Honor, Conscience, Duty, Justice, Love, etc. Morality is the essence of the true Dignity of Man. A truly Worthy Person is a person who cannot be disrespected; with all his manifestations, he inspires respect, reverence, approval, love.

- this is the one who implements these spiritual principles in his life and they are embodied in him in the lead of the relevant beliefs and personal qualities such as honor, honesty, etc.

To paraphrase, morality can be defined as follows. - this is the correspondence of ideas, beliefs, values, actions and all manifestations of a person to moral norms, universal values ​​(kindness, non-violence, honesty, respect, etc.), and ideally to all Spiritual Laws.

It is Morality that is an indicator of the degree of spirituality of Man and Society. What is Spirituality.

Morality and the morality (rules of conduct, etc.) it gives birth to were previously formed by Religion, commandments (Spiritual Laws in a religious interpretation), and are now largely destroyed. Of course, it must be revived and formed purposefully.

What is the basis of morality? What creates morality and what destroys it

The basis of morality is the distinction and, and the choice of the path of Good. About whether there is Good and Evil -. It is the understanding of what is Good, what is considered Worthy, and what is Bad, what is unworthy, shameful, unacceptable for a Human and determines moral standards.

It is precisely because of the lack of adequate ideas about Good and Evil in modern society that morality is in decline, people are stricken with vices and ignorance, and society as a whole is rapidly decomposing.

There is also a delusion that Morality is a set of restrictions that encroach on a person's freedom, restrain and block the manifestation of his individuality. This is a huge nonsense! Morality provides a vector, path and conditions for upward movement, under which a person can grow, develop at the highest speed, be protected from vices, possible moral decay and degradation, and be invulnerable to evil. It was during the highest periods of the flourishing of spirituality, when the moral standard was realized to the maximum extent in society, in the education of personnel, citizens, in culture, education, in the traditions of society, that great empires and states achieved their goals. the highest level development, civilization, culture, to which even many modern states still have to go and go.

Each time gives birth to its own poet. In the second half of the last century there was no more popular poet than N. A. Nekrasov. He not only sympathized with the people, but identified himself with peasant Russia, shook the hearts of his contemporaries with pictures of slavery and poverty, with notes of sincere bitter repentance. In one of his speeches about Pushkin, Dostoevsky spoke of the "universal responsiveness" of the poet, who knew how to feel someone else's as his own. The same can be said about N. A. Nekrasov. Moreover, his muse is surprisingly responsive to someone else's joy and pain.
Nekrasov's work is diverse in subject matter. But whatever it may be, one thing is invariable: in all the poems the moral credo of the poet is clearly expressed. In his works, he puts the hero before a choice, but does not turn away at this difficult moment for him, but tries to imbue his outlook on life. Nekrasov is not afraid to let the hero look into his inner world and evaluate his actions and deeds. Thus, the most hidden corners of the human soul, the moral and moral principles of man are revealed.
So, in the poem "Moral Man" the hero considers himself a person with high morality. But his "high morality" brings deep suffering to those who are close to him: his wife died, "tormented by shame and sadness"; a friend dies, unable to endure a debt prison; the peasant drowned himself after he whipped him; became an unhappy daughter, married to an unloved man.

Nikolai Nekrasov
moral man

My wife, covering her face with a veil,
In the evening she went to her lover;
I sneaked into his house with the police
And he convicted ... He called: I did not fight!
She went to bed and died
Tormented by shame and sorrow...
Living according to strict morality,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

I had a daughter; fell in love with the teacher
And I wanted to run away with him in a rush.
I threatened her with a curse: resigned
And she married a gray-haired rich man.
Their house was shiny and full, like a bowl;
But Masha suddenly began to turn pale and go out
And a year later she died in consumption,
Having struck the whole house with deep sadness ...
Living according to strict morality,
I have never harmed anyone in my life...

I gave the peasant as a cook:
He succeeded; a good cook is a blessing!
But often left the yard
And the name of an indecent predilection
Had: loved to read and reason.
I, tired of threatening and scolding,
Paternally cut him with a canal,
He took it and drowned himself: he found nonsense!
Living according to strict morality,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

My friend didn't show me the loan on time.
I, hinting in a friendly way to him,
The law has given us to judge:
The law sentenced him to prison.
He died in it without paying the altyn,
But I'm not angry, even though there is a reason to be angry!
I forgave him the debt on the same date,
Honoring him with tears and sorrow...
Living according to strict morality,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

First half of 1847

Ilyinsky Igor Vladimirovich July 11 (24), 1901, Moscow - January 13, 1987, Moscow. Soviet theater and film actor, master of artistic expression, director.

In our difficult time Moral problems, in my opinion, acquire particular urgency and relevance. It pains me to watch how people not only lose, but also cease to appreciate such qualities as kindness, loyalty, decency, sincerity, and especially love for their homeland, its customs, customs, traditions. How easily and simply we adopt everything that is foreign! how I would like to advise my generation: “Pick up a volume of Nekrasov! Stay alone with him! Read carefully, think about his lines and look into your soul! ". And everyone will find for themselves in his lines a response to what worries us, help to understand the meaning and value of high moral ideals in human life.
http://www.litra.ru/

The poem is not just malicious, but some kind of sharply self-critical. Or rather, not at all justifying the moral society of the time when Nekrasov worked. And it seems that everything in this work is clear and moreover, everything in it is correct.

If you look from the outside, the husband saved the family from shame by exposing his wife of treason, he gave his daughter a bright future by marrying an adult wealthy man, and the debt is a red payment, no matter how close a friend you are.

It would seem that everything is correct, what's wrong with that, if a person observes a moral approach to life. He's not a killer, he just wants to do what he thinks will be good for everyone. But for some reason, his wife dies of shame, his daughter dies from an unequal marriage, the peasant whom he brought to the people suddenly drowned himself, a friend imprisoned for non-payment of a debt dies. What are they? Still true, still true. The actions of a person of moral standing could not lead to such results. But…

After each part of the poem, it is repeated like a mantra: "I have done no harm to anyone in my life." It sounds like both a conviction and an excuse. Indeed, it is not he who is guilty of their misfortunes, but they themselves.

After all, it was not necessary to change, so as not to die of shame. It was not necessary to fall in love with just anyone, so as not to die of consumption in a rich family, it was not necessary to quarrel with the master in order to drown yourself later. And in the end, it was not necessary to borrow, so as not to pay it back and not go to jail. This person sincerely believes that he did no harm.

All his actions, according to his logic, brought only salvation and did as much as possible better life the people themselves. What is wrong here? He just acted in such a way that it was beneficial only to him. He saved himself from shame and from being called a "cuckold" by society.

He saved his daughter from a beggarly existence and his wallet from spending on the needs of his daughter. He taught his peasant to be a cook and began to eat well, but could not restrain himself and tried to teach a person to speak well. And, in the end, he tried to regain his own. That is, it turned out that these people brought themselves to a critical state and he had nothing to do with their deaths.

Nekrasov again and again in his poems speaks of the moral foundations of that time. It exposes those who, under the guise of morality, do evil, accuses such "quiet scoundrels" of meanness, arrogance and, strangely enough, of immorality.

Nikolai Nekrasov - Moral Man: Verse

Living according to strict morality,

In the evening she went to her lover;
And he convicted ... He called: I did not fight!
Tormented by shame and sadness...
Living according to strict morality,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

And she married a gray-haired rich man.
Their house was shiny and full, like a bowl;

Living according to strict morality,

I gave the peasant as a cook:
But often left the yard

Paternally cut him with a canal,
He took it and drowned himself: he found nonsense!
Living according to strict morality,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

I, hinting in a friendly way to him,
The law has given us to judge:


Living according to strict morality,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

Nikolai Nekrasov - Living in accordance with strict morality (Moral person)

I have never done harm to anyone in my life.
My wife, covering her face with a veil,
№ 4 In the evening I went to my lover.
I sneaked into his house with the police
And convicted. He called - I didn't fight!
She went to bed and died
No. 8 Tormented by shame and sadness.
Living according to strict morality,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

My friend didn't show me the loan on time.
No. 12 I, hinting in a friendly way to him,

The law sentenced him to prison.
He died in it without paying the altyn,
№ 16 But I'm not angry, even though there is a reason to be angry!
I forgave him the debt on the same date,
Honoring him with tears and sorrow.
Living according to strict morality,
No. 20 I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

I gave the peasant as a cook,
He succeeded; a good cook is a blessing!
But often left the yard
No. 24 And the title of indecent predilection
Had: loved to read and reason.
I, tired of threatening and scolding,
Paternally cut him with a canal;
№ 28 He took it and drowned himself, he found nonsense!
Living according to strict morality,
I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

I had a daughter; fell in love with the teacher
№ 32 And I wanted to run away with him in a rush.
I threatened her with a curse: resigned
And she married a gray-haired rich man.

No. 36 But Masha suddenly began to turn pale and go out
And a year later she died in consumption,
Striking the whole house with deep sadness.
Living according to strict morality,
№ 40 I have never done harm to anyone in my life.

Nravstvenny chelovek

Zhivya soglasno s strict moralyu,

Zhena moya, zakryv litso vualyu,
Pod vecherok k lyubovniku poshla.
Ya v dom k nemu s politsiyey prokralsya
I ulichil. On vyzval - ya ne dralsya!
Ona slegla v bed i died,
Isterzana pozorom i pechalyu.

Ya nikomu ne sdelal v zhizni zla.

Priatel v srok mne dolga ne predstavil.
Ya, nameknuv po-druzheski yemu,
Zakonu rassudit nas predostavil;
Zakon prigovoril yego v tyurmu.
V ney died on, ne zaplativ altyna,
No ya ne zlyus, khot zlitsya yest prichina!
Ya dolg yemu prostil togo zh chisla,
Pochtiv yego slezami i pechalyu.
Zhivya soglasno s strict moralyu,
Ya nikomu ne sdelal v zhizni zla.

Krestyanina ya otdal v povara,
On udalsya; khoroshy povar - schastye!
No chasto otluchalsya so dvora
I zvanyu neprilichnoye pristrastye
Imel: lyubil chitat i rassuzhdat.
Ya, utomyas grozit i raspekat,
Otecheski posek yego, kanalyu;
On vzyal da utopilsya, dur nashla!
Zhivya soglasno s strict moralyu,
Ya nikomu ne sdelal v zhizni zla.

Imel ya doch; v uchitelya vlyubilas
I s nim bezhat khotela sgoryacha.
Ya pogrozil proklyatyem yey: smirilas
I vyshla za sedogo bogacha.
I dom blestyashch i polon byl kak chasha;
No stala vdrug palenet i gasnut Masha
I cherez god v chakhotke died,
Sraziv ves dom glubokoyu pechalyu.
Zhivya soglasno s strict moralyu,
Ya nikomu ne sdelal v zhizni zla.

Yhfdcndtyysq xtkjdtr

;bdz cjukfcyj c cnhjujq vjhfkm/,

;tyf vjz, pfrhsd kbwj defkm/,
Gjl dtxthjr r k/,jdybre gjikf/
Z d ljv r ytve c gjkbwbtq ghjrhfkcz
B ekbxbk/// Jy dspdfk - z yt lhfkcz!
Jyf cktukf d gjcntkm b evthkf,
Bcnthpfyf gjpjhjv b gtxfkm////

Z ybrjve yt cltkfk d ;bpyb pkf/

Ghbzntkm d chjr vyt ljkuf yt ghtlcnfdbk/
Z, yfvtryed gj-lhe;tcrb tve,
Pfrjye hfccelbnm yfc ghtljcnfdbk;
Pfrjy ghbujdjhbk tuj d n/hmve/
D ytq evth jy, yt pfgkfnbd fknsyf,
Yj z yt pk/cm, )