When adverbial phrases are not isolated. Participial turnover

Like participial phrases, participial phrases are the property of book speech. Their undoubted advantage in comparison with their synonymous adverbial clauses of a complex sentence is brevity and dynamism. Wed: When the dog smelled the beast, she rushed to run in his wake. - Sensing the beast, the dog rushed to run in its wake.

IN At the same time, it should be borne in mind that by using the adverbial construction instead of the adverbial clause, we introduce some semantic changes into the sentence, in particular, we lose the shades of meaning inherent in subordinating conjunctions. Yes, adventitious tenses when he read the letter – after he read the letter – as soon as he read the letter – as soon as he read the letter have different shades, but are replaced by the same parallel syntactic construction - after reading the letter. In these cases, the loss of the union should be made up for by lexical means: after reading the letter, he immediately (immediately, immediately) ...

The loss of the union is even more noticeable when the adverbial turnover is replaced by subordinate clauses reasons, conditions, concessions: Having stayed in sa natorii extra month , he improved his health(after he stayed or because he stayed?); Feeling bad he didn't go anywhere else(because I felt bad or even felt bad?). And in this case, when using a participial turnover, the statement should be clarified using lexical means: Feeling bad, he because (yet etc.) didn't go anywhere else.

2. Some combinations can also be synonymous for adverbial constructions. For example, sitting with his arms folded across his chest can have as its equivalent a construction with a passive participle and a noun in the instrumental case with a preposition: sat with his hands baptized on his chest. Instead of lay wrapped in a warm blanket you can say: lying wrapped in a warm blanket(with the replacement of the participle by the participle). Wed: At night lay in a cart,covered with a greatcoat, throwing his hands over his head (Sh.). - At night lay in a cart,covered with an overcoat , with arms thrown overhead (replacement of both adverbial phrases with synonymous constructions).

Given that gerunds often also act as a secondary predicate, we can talk about the parallelism of the following constructions:

gerund = conjugated form of the verb: entering room, stopped = has entered into the room and stopped;

adverbial turnover = adverbial clause of a complex sentence: while reading a book, I doextracts = when I read a book, I make statements; in a hurry afraid to be late = in a hurrybecause he was afraid to be late; having free time much can be done = if you have free time much can be done; seeing the danger still brave walked forward = although they saw the danger, nevertheless boldly went forward;

gerund = prepositional-nominal combination:hopingfor success =In hopefor success;anticipatingsomething bad =in anticipationsomething unkind; fly,flattenedwings = flywith flattenedwings;

adverbial turnover = participial turnover: I arrived, ho well prepared for exams = I arrivedwell prepared for exams.

3. When using a participial turnover, it must be remembered that, as a rule, the action it denotes indicates the action of the subject. Therefore, the sentence is incorrectly constructed: Jumping off the footboard of the tram, my galosh flew off- here we are talking about the actions of two objects in the grammatical meaning of this word - about me (I jumped off) and about the galosh (she flew off). It is easy to verify the incorrectness of the construction by rearranging the adverbial turnover, which is usually freely located in the sentence ( The galosh, having jumped off the footboard of the tram, flew off from me).

The deviations from this norm found among classic writers are either Gallicisms or the result of the influence of the folk language: ...Having the right to choose a weapon, his life was in my hands (P.); Passing on the way back for the first time in spring, a familiar birch grove, my head began to spin and my heart began to beat from a vague sweet expectation (T.).

Does not violate the rules of the use of turnover with words based, not related to the subject, since it may not form a participial construction: The calculation is madebased on average production rates .

Archaic is the direct combination of the adverbial turnover with the subject that arose under the influence of the folk language (the inclusion of the subject in the composition of the turnover): Spruce Crowperching up, I was quite ready to have breakfast(Cr.); Arriving he is a direct poet, went to wander with his lorgnette alone over the sea(P.); But slavish loyalty Shibanovkeeping, svovo gives the governor a horse(ACT.).

In some cases, the adverbial turnover does not express the action of the subject and, at the same time, stylistic norms are not violated. So, the adverbial turnover can refer to the infinitive denoting the action of another person: His house was always full of guests, readyamusehis lordly idleness, sharing his noisy and sometimes riotous amusements (P.).

The adverbial turnover occurs with participial or adverbial forms denoting an action whose subject coincides or does not coincide with the subject of the action expressed by the predicate: She did not answer him, thoughtfully following the play of the waves,running upon beach, swaying heavy barge (M. G.); But Klim saw that Lida,listeningfather's storiespursing your lips doesn't believe them(M. G.).

In an impersonal sentence, it is possible to use a participial turnover with an infinitive: When editing a manuscript, take account ofnot only the content of the work, but also its general stylistic orientation; Summing up the work for the year , you can noteundoubted progress in solving a number of complex problems; It would be good nowreapnaked, covered with an overcoat , and think about the village and about your(Kupr.). In these cases, the sentence has neither a grammatical nor a logical subject. If the logical subject is represented by the form of the indirect case, but there is no infinitive to which the adverbial turnover could refer (Returning home, I felt sad), then the sentence is constructed incorrectly. In the modern Russian literary language, sentences like the following are no longer found: ... Convinced that he could not understand it. he got bored(L. T.); Reading the story carefully, I think, that there are no editorial amendments in it(M. G.).

It is allowed to use the adverbial phrase with the short form of the adjective: Varvara Vasilievna wasthe rights, offended by his long silence upon arrival in Pe terburg (Chern).

But the adverbial turnover should not be attributed to the passive participle, i.e., use it in a passive construction (Having run away from home, the boy was soon found by his parents), since in this case the subject of the action expressed by the predicate and the subject of the action indicated by the gerund do not coincide. The sentences found in fiction with a participle turnover with a passive participle are usually characterized by the fact that the subject in them is not the object of the action indicated by the participle: Next day, early in the morning, the fools wereamazed, Hearing the chime of the bell, calling the inhabitants to matins(S.-SH.). Wed, however: Passing several rooms I was greeted by the count himself, trembling and pale, like a canvas(L.).

It is also undesirable to use a participial phrase in cases where the predicate in a passive construction is expressed by a reflexive verb with a passive meaning: The idea of ​​building a tunnel under the English Channel has been discussed by specialists since 1880, without leading, however, to specific solutions for a long time.

The place of the adverbial turnover in the sentence is relatively free, but depending on its syntactic function and semantic meaning, the turnover either precedes the predicate (preposition) or follows it (postposition).

A prepositive is usually a participial phrase denoting an action preceding the action expressed by the predicate: Togyes Kuzma Kuzmich,taking a fresh cinder out of his pocket , zazhёg him and sat down next to Dasha(A. T.).

The same position is usually occupied by a participial turnover with the meaning of a cause or condition, which corresponds to the real state of things, since the cause and condition always precede the effect: Frightened by unknown noise , flock hard ngot dressedabove the water(Prev.); But,chatting with you , mushroomov notdial(P.). The adverbial turnover with the meaning of concession also always precedes the predicate: Berestov,etc knowing in his neighbor some folly , however, notdeniedit has many great features(P.).

However, in the conditions of a particular text, deviations from this rule are allowed: Vasily Andreevich also chased him away several times, but then againtook, cherishing his honesty, love for animals and, most importantly, cheapness (L.T.); I know- from the sun went down b, seeing our souls golden placers (M.).

The adverbial turnover with the meaning of the circumstance of the mode of action usually follows the predicate: Several wounded officerssaton the benchpicking up crutches (L.); Trezorfledahead,tail wagging (BUT.).

The adverbial turnover with the meaning of the subsequent action is also postpositive: Chichikovagreedwith this completelyadding that nothing could be more pleasant than to live in solitude(G.); Under Ignatovfellhorse,crushing his leg(L. T.); Somewhere closehitthunder,scaring everyonex (M. G.); The shack door suddenly opened, andhas enteredbig man,momentarily blocking the stars(Cat).

5. Participles (more often of the perfect form with the meaning of the state as a result of the previous action) in the function of the circumstance of the mode of action can be combined as homogeneous members of the sentence with other circumstances that perform the same function: The goose sat in the same position,open-mouthed and wings outstretched (H); The lady was seatedin armchaireither sideways or cross-legged (A. T.).

In the function of definition, the adverbial turnover can, together with the definition expressed by the adjective or participle, form a number of homogeneous members of the sentence: ... The cook moved along the wall of the corridor like a shadow,holding a cap in his hand and a white whole exactly dead(M. G.); Pechorin,wrapped up in overcoat and pulling a hat over his eyes, tried to get throughto doors(L.); Stepan Arkadievich,washed up , combed and beaming with a smile, walked out of his door(L. T.). However, the combination of the gerund participle and the verb-predicate as homogeneous members of the sentence has an obsolete character: cavalry guardsgalloped , but yetholding horses (L. T.).

Exercise 17 Specify the features of the use of adverbial constructions. Find out the possibility of synonymous substitutions.

1. Hidden in the shade, the violet calls to itself an unknown talent. (Elm.) 2. The coachman, who was sleeping, leaning on his elbow, began to five horses. (Hound.) 3. “My God,” said the doctor, “do you know whom I saw on my way here?” (Hertz.) 4. ... Returning home, it was necessary to ford Podkumok. (L.) 5. After reading this letter, the landowner was in deep amazement. (Ext.) 6 . Under a tree, with his belly up and his fist under his head, slept a huge man. (S.-SH.) 7. Suddenly, writing most seriously, I see that my handkerchief seems to be moving and suddenly falls to the floor. (Leek.) 8. Having now settled in the village, his dream and ideal was to resurrect the form of life that was with his grandfather. (L.T.) 9. Accepting a request from us, at least would flared up .... a sort of asp. (pis.) 10. Approaching this station and looking at nature through the window, my hat flew off. (Ch.) 11. But he did not seem to notice me, motionless, arms crossed over his chest, surrounded by an invisible cloud of boredom. (M.G.) 12. At noon, crossing the rails at the station, he was deafened by an unexpected whistle of a locomotive. (Cupr.) 13. The cavalrymen had to keep up with him and spur their horses. (A.T.) 14. The heavy news spread around the shelves, catching up on everyone with despondency. (Furm.)

Exercise 18 Correct the suggestions. Specify the nature of the stylistic error.

1. The use of these expressions and phrases can be clarified by illustrative examples, taking samples of fiction as illustrations. 2. Approaching the river, we stopped the horses, jumped to the ground and, quickly undressing, rushed into the water. 3. Previously, the machine was stopped to measure the part, while now, using a bracket of a special system, the size is determined in one go while the machine is moving. 4. Having risen up the Volga, the barge will be unloaded at the berths of Yaroslavl. 5. Such advice is required from science, which, if applied, would have a great effect in practical work. 6. Having read the manuscript a second time, I think that it needs serious revision. 7. It would be necessary to specifically indicate who exactly organized the construction work incorrectly, where and when the unfinished construction of the facility was accepted, thereby violating the government decree. 8. Then Sergeev is appointed head of the motor depot, working in this position for a year and a half. 9. The entire presentation in the book is made extremely short, taking into account the time budget of the practitioner.

Exercise 19 Correct the sentences, explain the mistakes.

1. The novel reveals the depth of social inequality that prevails in society. 2. The task carried out by us does not cause any particular difficulties. 3. The writer spoke about the changes in the book, which he is preparing for reprint. 4. In the near future, a new production will be shown, created by the entire theater team. 5. Our regularly published newspaper provides interesting information about the life of the city. 6. Daredevils who try to climb to the top of this mountain in winter conditions will pay with their lives. 7. Pupils who write poorly homework will have to redo it. 8. Each student who would like to participate in the work of a scientific society must submit an application to the dean's office. 9. A lecture given to students on the use of atomic energy aroused great interest. 10. A few days after the quarrel, Dubrovsky caught Troekurov's peasants in his forests stealing firewood.

Exercise 20 Replace attributive clauses with participial phrases; if this is not possible, state the reason for not being able to replace.

1. Chelkash was pleased with his luck, himself and this guy, who was so scared of him and turned into his slave. 2. Grushnitsky is one of those people who have pompous phrases ready for all occasions. 3. The author had to be present at the scene at the landowner Penochkin, which will remain in his memory for a long time.

Since the participial turnover is closely connected with the participle itself, we will give it a definition. A participle is a part of an application that denotes an additional action performed by the same person (object). A participle turnover, in turn, is called a participle with words or a word dependent on it. It, like the gerund, denotes an additional action. Thus, the participle is considered appropriate if it is an addition to the main action being performed. It can also refer to the subject.

How to find adverbial phrase in a sentence?

You can define this design using a question. The participial turnover, as well as the gerund participle, answers the question “What are you doing?”, “What are you doing”?

Basic Rules

1. In contrast to the participial turnover, the participial turnover must necessarily be separated by commas on both sides.
2. The adverbial phrase indicates an additional action. For example, in the sentence “I try to learn English by watching a video”, the construction “watching a video” is an adverbial construction and characterizes an additional action of the main person, while the construction “I try to learn” denotes the main action. Accordingly, it is impossible to use the adverbial turnover if it refers to different persons.
3. Also, the adverbial turnover cannot be used if the turnover refers to the passive participle. For example, in the sentence "Seeing other people aside, other people approached the guy." In this sentence, the turnover is not appropriate, so others are suitable, not the beholder.
4. The gerund can be used in a sentence where there is no person performing the action, that is, in an impersonal sentence. However, it is worth noting that in such a sentence there should have been an infinitive.

Examples of sentences with adverbial phrases

In order to learn the rules and better understand the topic, we will give several examples of sentences where there is a participial turnover.

1. I was very worried waiting for her at the entrance. In this example, the construction “waiting for her at the entrance” answers the question “What are you doing?” and additionally characterizes the action, therefore it is a participial turnover.
2. The road went up, skirting a part of the park. The road not only goes up, but also goes around the park. Thus, the construction “going around a part of the park” is a participial turnover, as it denotes an additional action.
3. We, looking at the sky, thought about a flying plane. Looks at the sky and thinks about the plane the same person. The verb-predicate and phrase refers to the pronoun "we". Please note that the turnover is isolated, that is, it is separated by commas on both sides.

Important rules for writing and using a participial phrase will help you identify it in a sentence and use it correctly in a given situation. By using the above rules and examples, you will be able to complete the sentence with important details without using several sentence-loading verbs.

So what is it? How to distinguish it from an accomplice? What punctuation marks does it stand out in writing? What questions does it answer? What difficulties can arise when using it in speech? These and other questions will be discussed in this article.

The adverbial turnover, like the participial, is an independent member of the sentence. He is gerund and related dependent words. Answers the questions of the participle: what are you doing? having done what? and denotes an additional action of the object / person performing the main action (it is usually determined by the predicate). In the proposal he is separate member, or rather, a separate circumstance.

Dot-dash (dash-dot) is underlined. You can also ask questions of circumstance:

• how?
• when?
• for what purpose?
• why?

They can be given both from the predicate, and in some cases from participle or participial turnover.

Examples

Commas when using a participial phrase in a sentence

The adverbial turnover, in contrast to the participle, always separated with commas on both sides, regardless of its location in relation to the main word - the verb from which the question is asked. In order to correctly highlight this syntactic construction with punctuation marks, you need to be able to find it in the text and clearly define the boundaries. The participle turnover includes all dependent words related to this participle.

For example, in the sentence "The opponent who was ahead of me at the start, soon fell behind" it is the expression "ahead of me at the start", and not just "ahead of me." Since the words "at the start" are also dependent on the participle, and not on the predicate. This means that they are part of the turnover.

When it is at the beginning of a sentence, separated by a comma on one side only- after it, and if it is located at the end, then, on the contrary, a comma is placed only before it, and at the end - a sentence completion sign.

The exceptions are the adverbial phrases that are part of phraseological unit. When a turnover is a part or a whole phraseological unit, commas are not placed with it. An example of such a sentence: the mother listened to her with bated breath. Also, those cases when several participial phrases are homogeneous and connected by the union “and” do not fall under this rule on setting commas. Then there are no commas. With punctuation marks, everything is very clear here, but there are often errors associated with the incorrect use of adverbial phrases.

Construction of a sentence with adverbial turnover. Possible mistakes

The first and most basic rule has already been mentioned above, it says that an additional action must be performed by the same object as the main action. For example, you can't say, "As I approached the house, a strange growl and howl came from behind the door." After all, the subjects here are a growl and a howl, they were heard, that is, they performed the main action. But there was no way they could approach the house, it was some other person who did it.

Thus, this sentence can be rebuilt into a grammatically more correct complex sentence: "When I / he / she approached / approached the house, a strange growl and howl came from behind the door."

One must also be careful when using the adverbial turnover in impersonal and indefinitely personal sentences, that is, sentences that do not contain a subject at all. The predicate in the first case can be expressed by the infinitive, and in the second - by the verb of the third person. An example of such an error is the following syntactic construction: “After graduating from school, graduates were assigned to work at a factory.” It is built incorrectly, since the participle implies the action performed by the graduates themselves: they graduated from school, and the verb (predicate) denotes an action performed by someone else who distributed these graduates.

In an impersonal sentence, the adverbial turnover can be included as follows: “You can look at their beautiful faces for hours without taking your eyes off.” In this case, all grammatical norms will be observed, since the person performing both the main and side actions is absent. You can also use it in definite personal sentences, that is, those that contain a subject expressed by a personal pronoun of the first or second person (I, we, you, you). For example, "I need to do this work as soon as possible, using all possible materials."

These are the main mistakes in coordinating the adverbial turnover with the basis of the sentence. They can often be found in our speech, as we sometimes do not attach due importance to this. But in vain, because the inaccurate use of the adverbial turnover leads to a violation of the semantic load of the sentence.

Participle turnover is a participle with dependent words. The participle is a part of speech that combines the features of a verb and an adjective. It can be found by schematic clue words: doing-done (for real participles), done-done (for passive).

If the participial turnover is before the main word, it is not distinguished by commas in the text, if after - it is distinguished:

Waiting for luggage passengers crowded around the conveyor.

Passengers waiting for luggage, crowded around the conveyor.

Both the participle and the whole participle in a sentence always play the role of a definition.

The gerund answers the questions what do you do? or What did you do? Both the single participle and the participle turnover are separated in writing by commas, they are circumstances.

The exceptions are cases when the gerund participle passes into the category of an adverb, then in the syntactic structure it is considered precisely as an adverb.

In Russian syntax participial is a participle with dependent words. In a sentence, it, as a rule, is an integral syntactic structure, that is, it is not divided into parts, and plays the role of a definition.

Wolves avoid roads laid by man.

Participle turnover standing after of the word being defined, is always isolated.

But there are cases of highlighting this turnover even when it is far from the word being defined, for example:

across the sky driven by the wind, fled torn, gloomy clouds.

If the participial turnover has a circumstantial value causes or concessions, even if it is before the noun it defines, it is separated by commas, for example:

Frightened by the crackling of firecrackers, the puppy huddled under the bench.

Exam Excitement Tired The boy quickly fell asleep.

Participial turnover constitutes the gerund itself surrounded by dependent words.

Noisy and playing on the riffles, the river carried its waters.

This turnover is always distinguished in the sentence, except for some special cases, for example, if the adverbial turnover is a homogeneous circumstance along with the adverb and there is a union between them And:

He said lazily And slightly stretching the words.

In order to deal with turnovers, you need to remember what participle and participle are.

The participle denotes the attribute of the subject, and the participle denotes the attribute of the verb.

The sacrament answers the question: which? which?, and the adverb: what to do, what to do?

Participle turnover is a participle with dependent words.

Accordingly, a participle with dependent words is called a participle turnover.

The participial turnover in the sentence in most cases acts in the form of a definition.

Participle examples: looking, considering, thinking, dreaming, etc.

Example of participial turnover: Girl, sitting by the fire, looked attractive.

Sitting by the fire, this is the sacramental turnover.

Since it is in the middle of a sentence, it should be separated by commas on both sides.

If the participial turnover is at the beginning of the sentence, then it is not necessary to separate it with a comma.

If at the end, then a comma is placed before the turnover.

For example: The girl who wore a red coat looked stunningquot ;.

" The girl wearing the red coat looked stunning.

Examples of gerunds: recognizing, reading, unlocking, reading.

The adverbial phrase is always separated by a comma.



Yes, from the point of view of the syntactic analysis of the sentence, the participial turnover always performs the function of a definition (because it answers the question Which / which / which / which? and is a sign).

For example:

1. child playing in the garden - child (what?) playing
2. strong wind dispersing clouds - wind (what?) dispersing

While the adverbial turnover will act in the sentence in the syntactic role of circumstance and answer the question how? quot ;:

1. the wind intensified, dispersing the clouds - intensified (how?) dispersing = circumstance of the course of action
2. calmly playing in the garden, the child was left without the attention of adults

• The participial turnover is a participle with dependent words, and the participial turnover is a participle with dependent words!

  Participle turnover: I saw a cat lapping from a bowl.

  He listened to the music coming from the receiver.

  Participle turnover: I looked at the rising sun without taking my eyes off.

  The goose, seeing the children, flew away.

  Participle turnover is nothing more than participle with dependent words. In a sentence, it acts as a definition, since it defines a noun. It is separated by commas if it comes after the noun being defined.

  A participle turnover is a participle with dependent words. In a sentence, it acts as a circumstance and is always separated by commas.

  Participle turnover in Russian is usually called a participle with a dependent word.

  The participial turnover is separated by commas if it is in the sentence after the noun, the attribute of which it denotes. If it comes before a noun, then it is not separated by commas.

  Grandfather, who came to us, was very sick.

  Grandfather who came to us went to rest.

  We call the sign of the verb a gerund participle, and a gerund participle together with a word dependent on it, a participle turnover. In sentences, the adverbial turnover is always distinguished by commas, no matter where it is located.

  Describing a circle, the paper plane crashed behind a pile of firewood.

  Mother entered the door, taking off her gloves as she went..

  The adverbial turnover is a gerund with dependent words and answers the questions: how? when? why? for what purpose? how?. For example: Hover over flowering willows, collecting golden pollen, bees flying out of the hive. In this sentence, the adverbial turnover is separated by commas. And the participial turnover is a participle with dependent words, that is, a verb + an adjective. The sacrament answers the questions: what? which? which? which? doing what? what did he do? For example: flying, distraught.

  The participial turnover is a participle together with dependent words. The participial turnover is always a definition in a sentence, since it defines the noun before or after it. The participial turnover is separated by commas only if it comes after the noun being defined, but if before, then it is not separated by commas.

  For example:

  A boy was standing on the shore, waiting for the ship.

  The adverbial turnover is a gerund together with dependent words. The adverbial turnover in the sentence acts as a circumstance. Commas are always separated.

  For example:

  Masha went home, singing a song.

  To remember the rules and practice in the definition of distinguishing one from the other, there are many tests both for home use and online. I bring to your attention a few:

  test in Russian by Zakharyina

  There may be egesh questions

  And on this portal you can read more about syntactic traps, in which cases the adverbial turnover cannot be used at all and why.

  

Participial turnover

In syntactical style: semi-predicative isolated turnover with the main member - gerund. Formally and grammatically, the gerund adjoins the predicate (usually the conjugated form of the verb), and in meaning it also refers to the subject, naming or procedural sign of the subject, additional in relation to the sign named in the predicate ( Petya spoke, carefully peering into her face.), or an action characterizing the action named in the predicate ( Having said everything, Lena could not calm down for a long time.), or the state of the subject accompanying the action named in the predicate ( He stood with his head down). Before. the first two types are correlative with subordinate clauses, that is, they have parallel syntactic constructions: cf. When Petya spoke, he carefully peered into her face.; Lena could not calm down for a long time after she expressed everything. In the subordinate parts of complex sentences, the predicate, corresponding in meaning to the gerund, but expressed by the conjugated form of the verb, emphasizes the action, enhances the meaning of its subject, conjunctions clarify the nature of the connection. Relative clauses in comparison with d.o. seem more significant, the latter formulate the idea more economically, but give the speech a book coloring. Before. of the third type do not correlate with other syntactic constructions. A typical speech error is independent adverbial turnover (*When I heard this, my legs literally buckled.- the subject of the action is expressed by the form of the genitive case; Working with us, you are guaranteed success- the subject of the action is expressed in the dative case; Knowing his behavior, I am surprised by his act- the subject is expressed in the form of the accusative case; Sitting at the window, a terrible picture opened up in front of me; I wrote the book in a good mood- the subject of the action is expressed in the instrumental case; Thinking about it, the mind goes beyond the mind- the semantic subject of the action is expressed metonymically; After reading the document, the dream vanished- the semantic subject is not expressed at all).

Educational dictionary of stylistic terms. - Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University. O. N. Laguta. 1999

See what "participle turnover" is in other dictionaries:

participial turnover- A turnover consisting of a participle and words dependent on it. From time to time, light ripples ran along the river from the wind, sparkling in the sun (Korolenko). The adverbial turnover indicates the action related to the subject of this sentence. Dating... ...

participial turnover- 1) A syntactic construction containing a gerund and dependent words. 2) One of the stylistic means used in book styles of speech, in particular, in scientific speech. For example: Moreover, knowing this, you can also compose ... ... Dictionary of linguistic terms T.V. Foal

TURNOVER- turnover, m. 1. Full circle of rotation, circular rotation. Wheel turnover. The shaft makes 20 revolutions per minute. || Moving back and forth, returning to the starting point. Accelerate the turnover of wagons. 2. A single stage, a complete process in a sequential ... ... Explanatory Dictionary of Ushakov

turnover- Same as construction. Participial turnover. Infinitive turnover. Participial … Dictionary of linguistic terms

TURNOVER- TURN, ah, husband. 1. see wrap, sya, turn, turn, turn, sya. 2. Use, use. Let in about. anniversary coin. Went into Fr. new word. 3. A separate part, a separate link, a stage of what n. activities, the development of which n ... Explanatory dictionary of Ozhegov

turnover- but; m. see also. reversible, turnover 1) a) Full circle of rotation; circular turn. Rev/t wheels. The number of revolutions per minute. Turn the key two turns... Dictionary of many expressions

turnover- but; m. 1. Full circle of rotation; circular turn. O. wheels. The number of revolutions per minute. Turn the key two turns. // Spec. Flipping from one side to the other, reverse. Plowing with seam turnover. // pl.: revolutions, ov. Specialist. unfold ABOUT… … encyclopedic Dictionary

participle- see gerund; oh, oh. A gerund / participle (a circumstance expressed by a gerund with words that depend on it) ... Dictionary of many expressions

Separate circumstances

Separate circumstances- 1. The participial turnover, as a rule, is isolated regardless of the place it occupies in relation to the predicate verb, for example: Walking next to him, she was silent, looked at him with curiosity and surprise (Bitter); The joy of entering into one... A guide to spelling and style

Books

• A set of tables. Russian language. Morphology. 15 tables, . Educational album of 15 sheets. Art. 5-8681-015. Morphological analysis of the word as a part of speech. Isolation of morphological features of nouns and adjectives by comparison.… Buy for 3480 rubles
• A set of tables. Russian language. Communion and participle. 12 tables + methodology, . Educational album of 12 sheets. Participle as a special form of the verb. Participial. Active and passive participles. NOT with participles. Н and НН in the suffixes of passive participles ...