global elite. Millennial world elites

Instead of a preface:

Disposition

The elite of the country - what is it?

Before the eyes of an astonished public in the country with the widest presidential powers - the United States - President Trump was pushed with his intentions to the farthest corner of the Oval Office. Thus, the enviable stability of the state course of America and the continuity of its policy were demonstrated, regardless of who is in power there.

At the same time, on the opposite side of the globe, the refrain is increasingly heard: “If one (only one) person leaves politics - the current president of the Russian Federation - then a state change of course may occur with catastrophic consequences for the country. As an example, the extremely unfavorable consequences of the change of Alexander III to Nicholas II, and Stalin to Khrushchev are given ...

It is precisely about this phenomenon - about the amazing dependence of such a huge country as Russia on the specific personality of the ruler - that I would like to talk, and focus not on “Why did it happen?”, But try to do it strictly in a practical plane, with an eye to the eternal “ What to do?” And not to the government and deputies, but to the most ordinary citizens who do not roam the corridors of power and do not have accounts in offshore jurisdictions.

There are several words, the presence of which in the title of any article guarantees an epic holivar and increased public attention. One such irritant for the entire civil society is the term "elite". No matter how you quote academic definitions, people still associate the word “elite” with the concept of “the best” and are very upset if such a term refers to someone who, according to their moral and business criteria, does not correspond to this concept.

The fact that the current self-named elites are the Achilles' heel and the main weakness of the Russian Federation is heard today from every iron. Only the lazy do not talk about the need to form a new elite (new oprichnina), but everyone breaks down on procedures and methods ... Oh, these methods ... Oh, this is the flip side of traditional Russian paternalism ...

Regarding the formation of the elite, civil society generates such proposals that immediately exclude citizens from the number of active participants in the process. “The Supreme Ruler should appoint those we like!”- such a sublimation of various variants of the formation of the elite is present in society today. However:

· Why should the ruler appoint those who please not him, but someone else?

Why should the one appointed by the ruler try to please someone else besides him?

· How should the ruler guess who is really useful, who is liked by the people, and who just walked along Populism Boulevard?

All these questions only exacerbate and emphasize the problem of elite formation through the subjective opinion of one, even the most senior and responsible person. An elite formed in this way usually suffers from nihilism in relation to predecessors and fear of successors, making it impossible to move forward without shying away and kickbacks.

So, on the one hand, there is a thousand-year-old financial intern having the same thousand-year experience in colonizing countries by non-military methods and an extensive network structure for the formation of adherents and agents of influence. On the other hand, there is the age-old hope for the tsar-father, who must figure out who and how to cope with all this misfortune, select the appropriate personnel and organize the process ...

Are expectations too high? Wouldn’t it be a strategically correct step to support the traditional hierarchical structure of Russian statehood with something networked… Well, if only because hierarchical structures in a fight with network structures are doomed to defeat… meat, but also the intellectual elite, from Lomonosov to Yesenin.

At the beginning of the 21st century, there were no communities or peasants left in Russia, but the challenges and threats remained the same. And it is necessary to respond to them somehow, forming the people's elite, as an alternative to the one that "our Western partners" are actively forming within the Russian world.

How to do it?

The problem of forming an elite, for which one is not ashamed, is undoubtedly recognized and understood by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Moreover, he not only accepts, but during all this time he has tried almost all available tools for its formation from above. She should not be ashamed, she should be able to adequately respond to modern challenges and could be an alternative to the “heroes of the 90s”.

The All-Russian competition "Leaders of Russia", the All-Russian People's Front, the Nashi Movement, United Russia - this is a short list of incubators of the new oprichnina, each of which suffers from the same original sin: the right to select the best is given to functionaries who are not at all interested in the appearance of someone better than themselves. And they themselves (in the opinion of the population) are far from being examples of competence, conscientiousness and patriotism. Maybe that's why the success of the listed incubators is not at all a lot?

The logic of objective and natural events taking place in the world macroeconomics is already raising the question point-blank before national politics - the mobilization of civil society or the complete annihilation of the state. The self-preservation instinct does wonders, and it is not at all alien to the celestials, and as soon as they understand that such mobilization is the only way for their personal survival, they become the most enterprising organizers of it.

However. Is it worth it for ordinary citizens who are not vested with power to passively wait for the formation of new versions of United Russia - 2, 3, 4, and so on? What losses will society suffer before the appearance of new Minins and Pozharskys? Is it not worth it to initiate the process of their materialization from below before these losses become catastrophic?

The beauty of civic initiatives is that their authors are not bound by any obligations that any leader is bound by. Unlike public politicians, ordinary citizens can afford an unlimited number of initiatives, finding by trial and error the variant of self-organization that best meets modern challenges and threats.

Therefore, I turn from general words to sentences, stipulating that these are only my thoughts, private and imperfect, in the hope that commentators will definitely add them with their sentences - exemplary and publicly acceptable.

A few days ago, a photo spread around the Russian Internet, where the premium winners of Olympiads in the natural sciences and athletes were compared - naturally not in favor of the “nerds”.

Commentators justified the injustice of this situation with the consequences of these victories, when the records of athletes can bring maximum moral satisfaction to the fans, while the victories of scientists turn into a shield and sword of the state, thanks to which external enemies can click their teeth, but no longer dare to touch ...

For the most part, commentators propose to correct this situation by changing government incentive measures, which are absolutely fair, but not entirely constructive, because ordinary citizens have a very indirect influence on decision-making on government incentive measures. But people's stimulation of young talents, whether organized at the lowest level, can kill two birds with one stone - to support morally and financially representatives of the truly popular elite and unite the citizens themselves.

To make the winner of the international Olympiad in natural sciences a millionaire, it is enough that his talent is appreciated by 10,000 people, each - 100 rubles. Of course, 100 rubles is not a like, you need to tear them away from yourself, but if you considered this possible, then the weight of such a decision would be more significant.

Although the point here is not a hundred rubles, but ten thousand, who have the same opinion that there is someone worthy, for whom the contents of their own wallet are not a pity. This worthy one, for whom money is not a pity, will be that elite. He will know exactly who his personal elite status depends on.

Developing this idea, we can talk to those for whom the people do not feel sorry for a personal plane and a yacht. It's a pity for Roman Abramovich and others like him. But for Mikhail Timofeevich Kalashnikov - it's not a pity at all. The wealth of Russian people is not annoying. The bearers of this wealth are annoyed if they took it from the people without their consent.

If the tradition of material and popular support for its best representatives turns out to be systemic and mass, scientists, doctors, teachers, engineers and representatives of other professions nominated and encouraged in this way will become a real alternative to self-nominated privatizers and their followers.

This may look like a network of the most diverse funds for the constant support of specific talents and transitional bonuses for winners of competitions and olympiads, working exclusively on a voluntary basis and naturally uniting only those who want and have the opportunity to support someone or something.

Just yesterday, the construction of such a system was absolutely unrealistic - only those who constantly loomed in the television box could claim the attention of the public. But today, when the number of people watching TV is steadily declining, and information has become possible to check and recheck online, there is little hope for its objectivity.

Well, if you don’t like it, it won’t work, or it won’t hook you - it doesn’t matter either. So either my proposal is of poor quality, or “the people are not yet ready for debauchery,” or maybe both. The formation of a new elite is inevitable, like the sunrise, and through what mechanisms is the third question. Let's hope that not through armed forces, because we exhausted the limit on revolutions and coups back in the 20th century.

What is the world behind the scenes? Andrey Fursov

How can an ordinary person join the world elite. Andrey Fursov

Descendants of hermaphrodites - the world's "elite"

More detailed and a variety of information about the events taking place in Russia, Ukraine and other countries of our beautiful planet, can be obtained on Internet conferences, constantly held on the website "Keys of Knowledge". All Conferences are open and completely free. We invite all waking up and interested ...

The Austrian newspaper Die Presse publishes an article by its correspondent Christian Ulch about the participants of the regular World Economic Forum in Davos, which ended yesterday.

"The global leadership stratum is made up of about 7,000 people: juggling billions of financiers, economic bosses, politicians and idea generators. Year after year they meet in a Swiss mountain village," the newspaper writes.

Among the participants are Bill Gates, who prefers to stay on the sidelines, 80-year-old financier George Soros, who, on the contrary, is constantly surrounded by a crowd of people, Bill Clinton, always in a hurry and always smiling, Nicolas Sarkozy, performing a traditional show in his favorite role as the savior of the Earth.

“The global elite gathers at an altitude of 1600 meters above sea level for their annual meeting, where meetings alternate with cocktail receptions. Whether it’s CEOs like the outgoing Eric Schmidt (Google), Carlos Ghosn (Renault-Nissan), Vikram Pandit (Citi), leaders like Angela Merkel, Dmitry Medvedev, David Cameron, whether they were prophetic economists like "Dr. 1400 managers of the largest international companies were invited to the ski resort, along with leading politicians, scientists and journalists. The list of guests takes up a whole book."

Those wishing to participate in all discussions are rumored to have to pay $75,000. Each of the approximately 25 strategic partners allegedly pays even more than $500,000.

Only 6-7 thousand people are considered to be the cream of this international leadership layer by David Rothkopf, author of the book "Superclass". The club recognizes two currencies: money and power.

Among the participants is the inventor of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, who has not yet reached his 30th birthday. "The explosive power of his invention, his information technology, can be seen these days in Egypt, where a protest movement against an aging dictator was organized through Facebook," the newspaper writes.

Zuckerberg is no exception. Most of the super rich don't owe their wealth to their daddy, but to their own efforts. Six of the ten richest people in the world are self-made people. self-made. Four others expanded their families' empires.

The majority of the billionaire club is not coupon clippers, but self-made riches, says Emmanuel Saetz of the University of Berkeley, who devoted a special study to this topic. According to his data, between 2002 and 2007, one hundredth of the US population accounted for 65% of income growth.

The Davos Forum is the invention of the German Klaus Schwab, who organized the first such meeting in the Alps in January 1971. His idea was to acquaint the leaders of the European economy with American management methods. A few years later, Davos became the scene of a new globalization. Following the brilliance and money, politicians were also drawn there.

Those who have a particularly high opinion of themselves organize their own conferences, writes Die Presse. Among them is the Ukrainian tycoon Viktor Pinchuk. Last year, his invitation to attend a meeting he hosted at the Black Sea palace where Roosevelt and Stalin signed the Yalta Accords in 1945 was followed by the likes of IMF President Dominique Strauss-Kahn and Bill Clinton.

Oleg Deripaska also organized his own party in Davos, the newspaper reports. "Champagne flowed like water, the Russian oligarch danced. The next day, dressed in a pullover, he stood in the Industrial Lobby of the Convention Center, shook hands with Tony Blair and had a lively conversation with Nathaniel Rothschild."

Numerous forum participants came to Davos from Asia, from the USA, more participants than before came from Latin America. "7,000 chosen ones successfully survived the crisis. In Davos they discussed, although not too deeply, whether a new crisis would come and if so, when. It was even about a new supercycle accelerated by the rapid growth of the economy," writes Christian Ulch in conclusion.

world ruling elites. From Adam to the present day
Article 2

Introduction
In modern studies of political elites, the authors use a number of concepts that not only do not clarify the understanding of what elites are, but completely confuse the reader. Therefore, before we start thinking about elites, it is necessary to deal with the very concept of “political elites”. For analysts and journalists writing on this topic, the very concept of elites is so vague, and there are so many elites that representatives of the main elites, and especially political ones, are lost in this multitude. They have everything from cockroaches to robots. And if someone starts talking about political elites, they usually talk and write about secondary and even tertiary political elites, but for some reason they avoid even mentioning the true rulers of states and the world, that is, those who make decisions. It seems that someone has created an information vacuum in this matter. The names of Obama, Sarkozy, Clintons and other politicians who are presented to the reader or listener as the arbiters of the fate of mankind are constantly heard at the hearing of the world community. This is probably a tribute to an old tradition, but with all due respect to their positions, they are more likely to be executors by their purpose and can only make current decisions, in line with the general policy direction already dictated to them. But who determines this direction?
So what are elites, political elites and ruling elites?
Confucius wrote that the human elite is the best of the best people, that is, it consists of those who possess the highest virtues, such as wisdom and justice.
The Russian philosopher L. Karsavin noted a very interesting situation with governance in a democratic state. In his opinion, in such a state, the people do not govern at all, the parliament almost does not govern, the cabinet of ministers governs a little, and the bureaucracy governs most of all, the only permanent and enduring element of power. That is, the ruling elite, according to L. Krasavin, does not exist at all, but there is an immortal bureaucracy that rules everything and everyone.
G. Mosca introduced the concept of a political class and deduced the law that society is always controlled by a minority, and even with a change of power, it is transferred from the hands of one minority to the hands of another minority. The minority has historically sought to close itself off from the rest of society and pass on its power privileges by inheritance, which then leads to the inevitable degeneration of the elite. In order to avoid degeneration, the wiser elites are updating themselves by admitting influential representatives of other strata of society into it.
Then V. Pareto officially introduced the term "elite". According to V.Pareto, the promotion of people to the elite is facilitated by their ability to foresee and express the hidden inclinations of the masses, that is, the possession of the qualities of a leader. The elite is not immutable and is in continuous transformation. This allows you to maintain social balance in the state, as it ensures, at the right time, the coming to power of elites with qualities demanded by the new social situation.
As follows from the above opinions, the concept of elite in human society initially included the assumption that these are elected people who stand out among others in that they have higher moral criteria for the individual, a high level of intelligence, and the talent for foreseeing social processes.
This concept would have been valid for all stages of the social formations of mankind, but only the need for just such qualitative criteria gradually disappeared. Public morality has been so transformed over time that those qualities that were once fundamental for the elites ceased to be valued in society and were replaced by new qualities demanded by the time. And since our reflections on modern politics and politicians, the original concepts and definitions of Confucius and other authors about the elite cannot be used, because current politicians do not use the concept of morality in their work, and the main advantage of a modern politician is unscrupulousness in achieving the goal . This has been formulated since the time of Machiavelli - the end justifies the means to achieve it. It may only be worth leaving a sense of foresight of the political situation. Taking into account the devaluation among politicians, high moral qualities, in modern political science, the analysis uses an altimetric approach, which is accepted among foreign scientists as the main one, and which evaluates belonging to the elite only by the fact that a person has real power and political influence. That is, the fact of possession of these categories is taken as a basis, but it is not considered mandatory that a person be in power and political structures. Such qualities as the presence of intellect, morality and conscience in the political elite community, we will leave out of brackets, or we will attribute them to the secondary qualities of the elite.
Considering that all modern political scientists recognize the term "political elite" and the very fact of the existence of many political elites, the purpose of our reasoning will be to achieve an understanding of the main circumstances that led to the emergence of the highest component of political elites - the world ruling elite, and its connections with other political elites who created it, but currently play a secondary role, serve it and are closest to it.
Political scientists in their analyzes operate with many categories of political elites, but, in my opinion, at the moment they deserve attention, those whose activities are visible and obvious:
- the world ruling elite - the leading elite, has real power, is not homogeneous in composition, consists of representatives of the financial elite and the industrial elite. It is a non-state shadow formation of a mafia type, its actions are not accountable to anyone, but these actions, unlike a simple mafia, are always legal. The legitimacy of actions is explained by the fact that other political elites, which are also the governing state elites, provide legislative support for the actions of representatives of the world ruling elite. The prominent representatives of the world ruling elite are the Rockefeller and Rothschild families;
- state governing elites - the oldest political elites, have power delegated to them by society. Usually this happens in the process of democratic elections, but the Western world is characterized by the delegation of these rights by the world ruling elite and legislated in the process of pseudo-democratic elections. The elites are represented by the highest power positions in the states - presidents and leading ministers, their duty is to organize the activities of their states in such a way that businesses, including those belonging to the world ruling elite, feel comfortable in their states;
- transnational elite - the youngest political elite, has power delegated to it by state governing elites. Represented by senior officials of supranational entities, such as the European Union, the UN, etc. Their duty, like that of the state elites, is to organize the activities of the international structures subordinate to them in such a way that the actions of the world ruling elite are constantly supported by international legislation. The transnational elite does not include top managers and other senior employees of transnational monopolies, who are the professional production elite.

Considering the initial multi-layeredness of the political elite, the purpose of this article is to consider the processes of the emergence of human elites, how they changed and, as a result, created the very elites that we currently have.

The ruling elites from Adam to our time.
The human world is voluminous and infinitely heterogeneous. If we were all the same, we would live in harmony, each would love his neighbor and would not want more than everyone has. This, probably, should have been the world that the Creator conceived. A world in which all living beings would come into the world and leave it according to the laws of nature and in harmony with it. The human world is heterogeneous, but for all its heterogeneity, it has one common and inalienable feature inherited by us from our ancestors - it is suggestible and manageable. The biblical tradition says that the first thing our forefathers did was to heed the guiding advice of the Devil and ate the apple of knowledge that settled in a person, the desire for knowledge, and with it the uncertainty about the lack of their own knowledge, and uncertainty requires a mentor and guide. So humanity began to live in a world full of doubts, which Adam and Eve left us after their fall, and the Devil in it, became the first leading and guiding force - the progenitor of all elites.
Adam and Eve, as good parents, gave birth to children, those other and the very first generations of our forefather laid down the concepts: the elder who led the younger ones and the eternal confrontation between Cain and Abel.
Gradually, people, guided by these principles, created a world in which all principles have remained unshakable to our time, the elders led the younger ones, the brother killed his brother in an effort to become a leader and be the first.
Time passed. Man settled in the world that the Devil opened to him. And since God, expelling a person from paradise, did not take away his mind, which makes a person god-like in terms of his ability to navigate the world, the person began to actively use it, and came to a conclusion that is completely undivine. He decided that he was chosen by the Creator, for something more, unlike other living beings inhabiting the earth. And since he is elected, then all other living beings are not elected, that is, below him and must obey him. Reason, a person seeks the essence for the benefit of himself. And reason justified for man the right to proclaim himself the ruler, that is, the king of nature, and declared all other creatures subordinate to him. So a man, guided by the mind in which the concepts of good and evil are mixed, appointed himself the first ruling elite of the living world.
Time passed, a reasonable man spread over the earth, exterminated the species of other people who, for some reason, did not have such a mind. He used the living world at his own discretion, and everyone around could not compete with a man armed with a sophisticated mind. A man, as a stronger one, received from the living world everything that he needed and in quantities that even exceeded this need. But the presence of a doubting mind laid the foundation for the first doubts in oneself and one's own kind. Thoughts have appeared about why it turns out that although all people receive from the living world the same means that ensure its vital activity, quantitatively some receive less and others more. Reason explained that one of the people was more capable and more successful than others, and due to these personal qualities, his family, and then the families of his children, and then the tribes flourished. So, thinking and doubting, the people around began to listen to the opinion of a successful person, and gradually recognized his supremacy. There were foremen and leaders who were entrusted with ensuring the well-being of the tribe. Time passed and everything that a person received from the living world became insufficient for him, and the mind made new discoveries for him. The development of fire was the most progressive step in the development of human society, it is like the discovery of steam energy in later times. Hot food appeared, which was easier to digest and made a person stronger. Through fire and hot food, man's power supply has increased many times and raised him to an unattainable height, in comparison with the animal world around him. Fire was followed by the discovery of metals, the creation of objects from them that strengthened it and made life easier for it, but at the same time further removed it from nature. The creators of weapons and household items also became respected people and could already compete in authority with the leaders. So, among those elected, along with the first politicians - leaders, gradually included production workers - artisans. The life of the tribe began to depend on more people.
The more numerous the tribes became, the more difficult the processes of their life support became and the more difficult it was for them to survive next to their own kind. There were territorial conflicts. This was the reason for the migrations. In the process of migrations and the development of new territories, the enlargement of tribes, a part of human society was finally formed, which was no longer engaged in ordinary work, but was looking for ways to ensure a more successful existence of its growing community.
So, gradually, the life of the community began to depend on the collegial decisions of a small number of smart and successful people, who became the first real governing elite. The emerging elites served the tribes, then the unions of the tribes, then the states, and for a long time were one with their community, which maintained the appearance of democratic government. However, representatives of the elite were also people and, guided by the same dual mind, did not forget about their own benefit and, at some initial stage of development, they not only ensured the life of society, but also began to use society for their own purposes. Thus, an elite reasonable person laid the foundation for the separation of public and private interests. Time passed, the emergence and development of religions allowed the elites to justify their supremacy, consolidate their position and finally break with the simple world. A new human world has emerged - the world of the ruling elite, justified by religion and philosophy. The process of the emergence of royal, and then imperial dynasties, even legalized the fact of the unearthly power of the ruling elites. Along with this, the ruling elites constantly reduced the ability of society to control their activities, introducing and developing various forms of democratic governance.
The power forms of government of individuals or dynastic families, at some stage, ceased to suit that part of the community that had capital, which was often lacking among the ruling elites and that gave them this capital, but in return wanted to have power. This forced the ruling elites to constantly invent for their salvation, instead of totalitarian forms of government, special democratic forms of government, which at one time or another corresponded to the desires of the ruling elites and owners of capital. The meaning of the changes usually consisted in the fact that totalitarian management in the form of one person or a group of persons from one family clan was replaced by the management of elected representatives from several clans that had been formed by that time and were an influential part of society and were responsible for certain areas of activity. communities.
So the elites, after lengthy transformations, acquired the following form:
- the political elite - including members of hereditary monarchies, elected leaders of the state, members of the government, deputies of the legislative body, that is, everyone who is directly involved in political decision-making.
- economic elite - a group of people that controls the capital and basic economic resources of society and whose representatives were part of the political elite.
- military elite - a group that controls the means of suppression and destruction of people, ensuring the security of the state.
- bureaucratic elite - represented by the highest officials of the state apparatus. Their task was to implement the most important political decisions.
- ideological elite - representatives of the community that form the ideology of society.

Power was divided into levels, divided, and with the introduction of such a government, the elites became multidisciplinary, but the right to make a decision remained only with the elite that was at one time or another more in demand. Political, economic and military elites competed and succeeded each other. And in our time, such a distribution of elites is true for developing countries. The more developed political systems of today are characterized by the cooperation of two political and economic elites, and the military elite in such states acts strictly within the framework of their functions. The first country in modern history that had a single ruling elite was the USSR, and this elite became the political elite, after which all the states of the socialist camp became the same countries. And the first country where the economic elite came to a dominant position was the United States. So far, history does not confirm the correctness of the choice of this or that ruling elite as the only guiding force. The USSR disappeared, with its ruling political elite, but China remained, which successfully exists, controlled by a single party elite. The United States, in which the economic elite is more than 200 years old, still dominates the world, but within it there has been a split into the financial elite and the industrial elite, and the coexistence of these elites is far from peaceful. Since the world's ruling elite is concentrated mainly in the US and Europe, it is precisely its path to power in these countries that is interesting. Electoral democracy was also improved along the way to the creation of a ruling elite. The countries of the Western world are characterized by a system in which directly elected or appointed representatives from all elites participate in the approval of decisions. This type of participation in the government was called representative democracy, although it has nothing to do with democracy, but bore and still bears all the signs of a gradual transition to oligarchic rule. A minority that is part of the political and economic elite owns almost all economic resources and this minority rules the state. The processes of appointing representatives of the authorities, with the indirect participation of members of society with the right to vote, received a universal right to exist and gradually shaped the structure of the elites, corresponding to the modern one.
But the representative form of governing societies was not new, it was used in the states of Ancient Greece and Rome, in state formations in the Middle Ages, and since it is used in a transformed form for most states of our time, it brought with it all its historical shortcomings.
As befits any society, the interests of the political ruling elites of various states became, under certain circumstances, antagonistic, which led to wars over the redistribution of spheres of influence in the markets within countries and world markets.
Using this scheme of government, the ruling elites, and accordingly the states they ruled, survived in continuous wars until 1913. There were even centennial wars. The outbreak of the war of 1913 was the last war that bore all the obvious signs of a war for the redistribution of spheres of influence and which, after its completion, opened a new page in the history of the development of the ruling elites, and most importantly, it was the first global world war. It may not have been the last world war in the struggle for spheres of influence, but the worldwide dissatisfaction with the ruling elites, by the end of the war, became so powerful that in one of the warring countries, it led to the complete destruction of its state structures created by the ruling elite for several centuries. The result of the war was the emergence of a new state, accompanied by the total destruction of the ruling elite and all the elites accompanying it.
This had a sobering effect on the ruling elites of European states, and the fear of following the Russian elite forced the state ruling elites of Europe to start developing a new, non-military concept for eliminating contradictions between them and providing conditions for their own further peaceful coexistence. Agreements were reached, as a result of which interstate political bodies were created, designed, according to the ideas of their creators, to smooth out contradictions between states. Outwardly, it seemed that everything was resolved and the European ruling elites were no longer in danger.
The RSFSR, the heir to the Russian Empire, weakened by war and revolution, did not participate in conflicts clarifying the post-war boundaries of the world, it stood apart from all European states and did not present territorial claims to anyone.
But the European state ruling elites were alarmed by the fact that during the revolution, in Russia, firstly, the ruling elite and other elites were completely destroyed, and secondly, the slogan was voiced - “all power to the people”, that is, the new Russian government was outlined the path to the introduction of popular government, which is fundamentally different from European representative democracy. And besides, the Soviet leadership began to actively implement this slogan into practice, while finding numerous supporters in the societies of Europe.
The introduction of the new government in Russia was accompanied by a general nationalization of property, which was the exact opposite of the right of private property common throughout the rest of the world, that is, it undermined the very foundations of the Western world.
The elites could not help but be alarmed by the fact that in the process of implementing the ideas of democracy, the theorists of socialism had the idea of ​​a global proletarian revolution. The International was created - a kind of forge for the preparation of new European popular elites.
Before the state ruling elites of the capitalist states, in the implementation of Russia's planned projects, the threat of losing power over all the communities controlled by them again loomed. And there was something to lose, because with the end of the First World War, the state ruling elites of the Western world were already fully formed, and the world was divided among them.
Of course, the borders of their own states still remained cramped for the implementation of the plans of the local ruling elites, and the colonial markets, according to some states, were divided not quite fairly, but after the events in Russia, none of the European elites could decide on a war for redistribution markets. In addition, a solution was found to get around the remaining contradictions, and it consisted in the fact that at the beginning of the 20th century a transnational business program was launched. It was the first project of a new nascent political structure - the world ruling elite, which was no longer satisfied with the conditions of business within the framework of the laws of independent states. In America and Europe, as the leading countries, transnational financial institutions, transnational monopolies first began to emerge, and after them, the first signs of connections between state ruling elites and new transnational elites appeared, the interests of which these state elites were forced to protect by creating new interstate laws. . After the adoption of these laws, transnational elites were already able to conduct business outside their own states without any special risks, and representatives of state elites, after leaving power structures, joined the ranks of the transnational elite .. So it seemed that the last main reasons for wars gradually disappeared.
By the middle of the twentieth century, the state ruling elites and transnational elites had practically united, together with them financial capital and industrial capital were united in a common interest. In the process of merging state and economic elites, the structure of the world ruling elite was also taking shape.
This was also facilitated by purely human relations. The initial rapprochement of state political elites began much earlier and took place along the path of cross-dynastic marriages, which mixed families so much that they actually created a single European political dynasty, and this is especially pronounced in the family ties of the American and English elites. All the rulers of the countries were brothers or cousins. Then the same situation then repeated itself in the economy, where financiers and industrialists created dynasties that own banks and enterprises in all countries of the world. Then, in the process of marriages, the state ruling and economic elites mixed up. And if marriages were just beginning to unite all the elites, then transnational business consolidated this union. So, at the beginning of the 20th century, a new transnational, interstate, uncontrolled world ruling, almost family elite arose, which, as expected, began to create conditions for ensuring its existence in this new capacity. The first step of the world ruling elite was the beginning of the development of a unified system of government through the further transformation of "democratic" parliamentarism, by creating one in which presidents and governments of states would no longer be chosen by society, but could be appointed by this world ruling elite by "democratic" methods, and she herself could remain in the shadows.
The first such "democracy" began to be introduced in the United States. Gradually, at the beginning of the 20th century, the US election process was worked out to the smallest detail, and it did not matter which of the presidential candidates won, since both of them were already agreed between the American political and world ruling elite. Thus, in one state, the plans of the world ruling elite were realized, and it, without personally participating in political state structures, began to manage the most powerful economy in the world.
The experience with American representative democracy would be successfully implemented further, but on the way to the implementation of the spread of "democratic parliamentarism" throughout the transnational world, the problem of the ideological heterogeneity of the world surfaced, and for the successful implementation of the plans of the world elite, the whole world must be politically uniform, that is, liberal, as America.
The main obstacle to the implementation of the plans of the world ruling elite was the existence of the USSR, where the socialist slogan “all power to the people” was still operating and being implemented, and, which was especially alarming for the Western elites, it was implemented very successfully under the leadership of Stalin, and which, just as successfully did state the entire economy, and along the way he created a new Soviet political elite, the basis of which was to be people brought up in the Soviet era. But the creation of a new Soviet political elite provoked resistance from the Bolshevik Jewish elite, which was international and took an active part in the October coup. She could not come to terms with her gradual removal from real power in the new state. Stalin, in response to their resistance, began the systematic destruction of the representatives of the old Bolshevik elite. The reason for this was not only the resistance of the old Bolsheviks to the creation of a new Soviet elite, but also the main sin of the Bolshevik elite, and it was that it was international and was looking for ways to get closer to the ruling elites of the West, who pushed it in every possible way, and this did not suit Stalin at all.
But, besides the USSR, there was a second problem. The results of the First World War prepared another unpleasant surprise for the new ruling elite - the emergence of the Third Reich in Germany, which they defeated. The Nazis, unlike the ruling European elites frightened by the First World War, openly demanded a new redistribution of the world, and besides, their slogan sounded very menacing to the ruling elites - "Germany for the Germans." It was very similar to the slogan of the Bolsheviks - "all power to the people", only on a smaller scale. In addition, the Third Reich had a very strong position in relation to the Western world. Unlike the USSR, German financial and industrial capital had long been transnational and actively participated in the activities of other transnational monopolies. This position of Germany was so beneficial for the Western industrial elites that they subsequently surrendered all of continental Europe to Hitler practically without a fight, and only so that their business interests in European countries would not suffer. The industrial elites of European countries and the United States did not want to fight Hitler. However, Hitler's further actions, namely his desire to destroy England, which at that time was, like the United States, the backbone of world financial capital, alarmed the world elite. At the same time, the world elite was not so much worried about the process of genocide against the Jews that began in the Third Reich, which in itself was recognized by them as not so original and was carried out even in the ancient world, when preparing serious plans. Yes, and in later times, in the same England, which back in the 12th century was the first to use yellow identification marks and expelled the Jews from the island. The world elite was alarmed not so much by the expulsion of Jewish bankers from the Reich, but by the subsequent nationalization of their banks, that is, the actual destruction of the old financial elite in one more state. There was an association with Russia, where this has already been implemented in the most radical way. Everything indicated that the same thing could happen to England, the stronghold of the world's Jewish financial elite. So the problems that arose threatened the very existence of the Jewish financial elite, which was already dreaming of sole power.
In addition, the Jewish financial elite itself was aware that the war with Hitler would be lost by Europe, since the transnational industrial monopolies, and, accordingly, their owners, were not very interested in destroying the already established European production mechanism, and even more so in a confrontation with Hitler. And the industrial elites were not going to oppose Hitler only in the name of protecting the Jewish financial elite. It didn't really matter to the industrial elites who owned the banks, a Jew or a German. These fears of the financial elite were confirmed by the fact that the industrial elites of Europe and the USA, at the very beginning of the Second World War, surrendered without a fight both the Czech Republic and Austria and Poland. So for the first time, disagreements appeared in the world ruling elite, and which the financial elite, in the future, will remember the industrial elite when, in the 60s of the 20th century, it creates and implements a monetary system in the world economy, and then with its help, pushes the industrial elite to secondary roles in world governance.
But it was still ahead, and then the Jewish financial elite urgently needed to save themselves, that is, to find a way to reorient Hitler towards an enemy that could destroy him, and this only force was the USSR. Thus, the financial elite solved both problems at once, destroyed both the USSR and the Third Reich.
History confirms that the Jewish financial elite was able to do this.
The war was unleashed, the USSR was involved in it and Hitler lost. But after the destruction of the Third Reich, the most dangerous enemy - the USSR did not disappear, but during the war it became even more powerful and, to the surprise of the whole world, most successfully emerged from the post-war crisis. In addition, on the ruins of Europe, suddenly for the world ruling elite, new states arose, where the slogan "all power to the people" was also implemented. Stalin's death, which is still a mystery to many, made it easier for the world's ruling elite to prepare for the collapse of the USSR and separate pro-Soviet puppets from it.
The long cold war, planned by the world ruling elite, was mediocrely lost by Stalin's heirs, who inherited undivided power, but did not become a real ruling elite. They did not inherit Stalin's ability to run the state, but secretly, like the old Bolshevik elite, in the destruction of which they took an active part, they dreamed of integration into the Western economic community, hoping for the help of this community.
The financial elite, which by that time had finally gained a foothold in the United States, reminded the industrial elite of its warm relations with Hitler, and took revenge, practically removing them from participation in decision-making on the development of the world economy. It blocked all attempts by the world industrial elite to establish economic relations with the USSR, which, in its opinion, would lead to an unnecessary strengthening of the industrial elite for it, and, most unpleasantly, to an increase in the power of the USSR. Having eliminated the industrial elite, the financial elite, through its representatives in the European financial system, introduced a monetary project in Europe to create a bureaucratic superstructure - the European Union, which was completely under its control. The next and unexpected success for her was the collapse of the USSR, and in this she was helped by the mediocre actions of the elderly Soviet elite.
But by the time of the collapse of the USSR, the founding fathers of the world financial elite, as well as the Soviet party elite, became mentally decrepit, and its top managers made an unforgivable mistake for themselves and missed the favorable moment for the integration of Russia and the states that emerged on the site of the former USSR into the European "democratic" community. And if this were implemented, then Russia would completely fall under the control of the world ruling elite. However, the world financial elite, due to the inertia of the Cold War, continued the senseless confrontation with Russia, the successor of the USSR, seeking its complete destruction. But if she had thought with the same brains that sent Hitler to the USSR, she would have understood that Russia's integration into Europe would be a boon for Europe and for the financial elite itself, would subsequently lead to Russia's complete economic dependence on the United States, and how result in the loss of state independence. But the top managers of the world financial elite, who acted on its behalf, preferred to receive dividends from the plunder of the collapsed USSR, that is, to engage not in politics, but in financial scams, acting through the Russian oligarchs created by it. But the confrontation between Russia and the Western world ended, the proceeds of plunder disappeared, and the pro-Western puppets who temporarily came to power in Russia completely discredited themselves and the Western economy began to slide into the global financial crisis. The oligarchs, implanted and patronized by the global financial elite, were forced to flee Russia, and those who remained, outwardly, were forced to accept the terms of the game that the new Russian government offered them. Time has been lost and now the rapid revival and strengthening of Russia is again a headache for the world ruling elite, and especially the fact that the new rulers of Russia continue to pursue a policy independent of the West and prove to the whole world that it is possible to exist without the tutelage of the world ruling elite, and this is a bad example for other countries.
In addition, after the collapse of the USSR, unexpectedly for everyone, the second economy of the world arose - an independent China in behavior, which, led by its political elite, will eventually become an even greater headache for the world ruling elite. Today it is already clear that China has always played and continues to play its own game and even now does not take into account the plans of Western monetary theorists.
But in addition to Russia and China, problems arose in the conduct of transnational business, which, after the scams of thorpe managers of the financial elite, led to a global crisis. The ruling elite's new idea of ​​world globalization was put under attack. Globalization, according to the world financial elite, was supposed to represent a step forward compared to the transnational economic management that still exists. It was to become a worldwide process of economic, political and integration and unification. Globalization, instead of a collection of national economies linked to each other by a system of international division of labor, offers a single world market, with the simultaneous destruction of the national sovereignty of states, and this is very important for weakening the economies competing with the West. However, on the way to the globalization of the world, the heterogeneity of state political systems again rises, as before the Second World War, which can greatly limit, if not completely destroy the very idea of ​​globalization.
Time shows that although the political games of the world ruling elite are still going on, but already in the endgame and in a disadvantageous position for it, and given that its players are far from being grandmasters, the outcome for the entire world ruling elite can be very sad. The contradictions that still exist between the financial and industrial world elites cannot be dismissed from the account. Information leaked to the press on the negotiations between them shows that they have so far ended in vain and, by all indications, that the financial elite does not want to share power with anyone. But, while recognizing the contradictions within the world ruling elite, we must remember that the ruling elites have existed since the emergence of tribal relations and they will not disappear even if the existing world ruling elite is weakened or even disappears. It is impossible to predict what the new ruling elites will be like, but only one thing is clear, that none of them will be able to claim world domination, there will be several elites, and where there are many interests, there are many contradictions. And how the contradictions between the elites are resolved, the world has already experienced more than once.
The eternal question - what to do?
Firstly, humanity must realize that the leadership of the modern world ruling elite, which is still strong and has not abandoned its claims to rule the world, consists of elderly, absolutely unprincipled people. The younger generation did not inherit the grip of their parents, but they are much more aggressive than them.
Secondly, it will be impossible to agree on something with representatives of the world ruling elite, because they live in a different human dimension, because they have learned over the past centuries what unlimited power is, and most importantly, they have felt the taste and sensations of possessing this unlimited power. power and feel impunity for any of their actions.
Thirdly, we must understand that elites are eternal and as long as humanity exists, there will be elites, and a new one, which is not always better than the old one, takes the place of the disappeared one.
Fourth and most important, the modern world ruling elite has worked and will continue to work only in its own interests, the interests of states and peoples do not exist for it.
The only weakness of all elites is that they want to live long and continue to rule. It is pointless to set ourselves the task of destroying the modern world ruling elites - they will quickly resurrect in a different guise, because it is impossible to destroy what brought them to power - capital. So it is necessary to put the modern world ruling elites in a situation in which, for all their unscrupulousness, they must realize that changes are needed for the sake of continuing their own existence and preserving capital.
And these changes are to restore independence to the states that have become dependent on them, then to establish a dialogue between independent states and the world ruling elite, representing the interests of financial and industrial transnational monopolies. Without this dialogue, there will soon be no modern world ruling elite in the form in which it currently exists. How difficult it will be to implement is shown by the example of today's Germany, which is trying to maintain its independence, being within the framework of the European Union, but it is alone fighting for its independence.
It must be remembered that confrontation in societies, between states is always beneficial for the world ruling elite, because it will always win in a confrontation, even if one of the parties wins.
Only independent state elites can contain and oppose the actions of the modern world ruling elite. The strengthening of the ruling elites of these states leads to a weakening of the influence of the world ruling elite, and, consequently, makes it more susceptible to concessions and changes. (to be continued)

Sergey Romanov Strogalov

Rampant sexual minorities simultaneously in all countries of the world and attacks on society by the so-called "liberals" cannot but alarm sensible humanity.

As a result, we have thousands of protest demonstrations in France, Germany, Georgia and Russia. People are outraged that the state and regional authorities of a number of countries allow gay parades and same-sex marriages, while spitting on the opinion of the sane majority.

Why is this being done and who is lobbying for the interests of the gay community?

Without a doubt, the current world gay show is held solely to cause a wave of aggression against moral monsters all over the world, and through this to bring millions of sane people, champions of traditional values, into the so-called "pyrophoric state".

The majority, unfortunately, does not imagine WHAT THE BEGINNINGS are these processes.
Since I am presenting, I would like to explain what is actually happening now.

There is some kind of "active evil" in the world, which has long been hatching plans to establish a NEW WORLD ORDER, a radically new order, about which there is an inscription, for example, on the US dollar bill.

To create this NEW WORLD ORDER, it is necessary to break the current order, for this, in fact, an artificial one is being created now. global chaos.

It will sharply increase when "active evil" pulls invisible strings and provokes a global financial crisis in the world.
The crisis will not be difficult to arrange for those in whose hands are the levers of control of the global financial system.

The global financial crisis has been talked about in society for a long time, and it is presented solely as a kind of inevitability.
Back in December 2011, D.A. Medvedev, as president of Russia, informed all Russians that an unprecedented global financial crisis would happen very soon, and this was not a bluff or an empty phrase at all. “International experts believe that the world economy has entered a period of great or great depression. And this is not just a comparison, it is, unfortunately, an economic fact, in any case, a trend.- said the head of the Russian state two years ago. (http://top.rbc.ru/politics/26/12/2011/631834.shtml).

The new world order in the understanding of a certain "world elite" means not only a radical break in the current social order, but also a significant artificial reduction in the population of the planet. According to analysts, this "elite" is planning, by means known to them, to reduce the world population by approximately 2/3, that is, by 6 or even 7 billion people. This became known back in 2009 from the revelations of the multibillionaire Ted Turner, and in 2010 even a report was read within the walls of the State Duma of Russia by Professor Yu.V. Kurnosov.

Who is part of this "global elite" hatching such plans?

“The list of participants, which fell into the hands of journalists and was published in the Greek newspaper To Vima, includes David Rockefeller, Queen of the Netherlands Beatrix, Queen of Spain Sofia, Belgian crown prince Philip, US Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, President of the World Bank Robert Zoellick, WTO Director General Pascal Lamy, US Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrook, President of the European Central Bank Jean-Claude Trichet, President of the European Commission Jose Manuel Barroso, head of the IMF Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Former Chairman of the US Defense Policy Council, Fellow of the American Enterprise Institute Richard Pearl, fellow of the same institute, former head of the World Bank Paul Wolfowitz, Commander of US Central Command Gen. David Petraeus, head of the Brussels think tank Brueghel Jean Pisani-Ferry, responsible for UN-AU Joint Peacekeeping Operations in Africa Romano Prodi, chairman of the board of directors of British Petroleum and financial adviser to the Vatican Peter Sutherland, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Royal Dutch Shell J. Van der Veer, former director of the English service of MI6 Richard Darlow, official historian of the Rothschilds and H. Kissinger, economist Neill Ferguson…» (Bilderberg 2009 article: "Global elite" before the choice: http://www.warandpeace.ru/ru/reports/view/35984/).

It is they and hundreds of other representatives of the world elite, whose names are not yet known or confirmed, who are today concerned about the idea of ​​establishing a NEW WORLD ORDER.

And literally right before our eyes, a new action began to unfold: one to one, as during the Second World War, the "world elite" began to "merge" the Jews.
The Jews again (!) must become a kind of "red cloth" in the hands of the world "bullfighter". They once again have to play the role of a lightning rod, whose task is to take the brunt, but at the same time save the main villains.
Evidence of this is a recent publication in the media.

Obama Administration Officially Recognizes "Jewish Conspiracy"

One gets the impression that the US presidential administration has completely lost its sense of reality, since it makes such political and PR blunders as in April-May 2013, the next of which was the actual self-disclosure of the Barack Obama team, which publicly acknowledged the existence of "Jewish Conspiracy" in the United States and the world, which shocked Jewish public organizations and Jewish businesses, which now seriously fear for their safety.

What people around the world used to only whisper and discuss on the sidelines is now officially voiced by Washington, and now humanity knows exactly to whom it owes LGBT propaganda and lobbying for same-sex marriage at the state level.

According to the Washington Post, on May 21, 2013, at an official reception hosted by the US Democratic National Committee for the "Jewish American Heritage Month" (month of honoring distinguished American Jews), US Vice President Biden delivered a speech in which he recognized the exceptional role Jews that the idea of ​​same-sex marriage ("gay marriage") was legally recognized in some states of America.

In addition, he stated that “85% of all the recent changes in Hollywood and in the public media have been possible only because these industries are led by Jews ... whose influence is huge ... truly huge ... ".

Biden also noted the influence of Jews in the region "...changes in immigration law, the civil rights movement and the achievements of feminism".

According to the second person in the country after President Obama, “we (the United States) are a great country largely because of the contributions that Jewish heritage and Jewish principles bring to us.”

The pathos of the vice president's speech seemed excessive even to some of his listeners. Thus, Jonathan Chait of New York Magazine suggested that Biden's speech could give trump cards to opponents of the Jews, indirectly confirming the existence of a "Jewish conspiracy". Other authoritative Jews in the United States, who were also present at this event, were also not enthusiastic about Biden's frank speech ...

No matter how the Russian elite grimaces in disgust, having heard about the "Russian people", there is no way for it to join the world elite! She stole, got up, but she can no longer stick to any shore ..
G. Dzhemal. Elites and their allies.

the defeat of the United States is inevitable Because this ratio is incommensurable. National imperialism, based on the "soil", has no chance in the fight against the boundless network of unstructured, but organized chaos - an enemy that is everywhere. And this adversary acts in the interests of the traditional elite, which is 1.5-2 times older in the genesis of their homes, their ties to the United States as a political entity.

Confrontation between the New and the Old World (about America at the link, continued below)
Mushroom of the English royal house.

Today the European elite is a system of club power.
Clubs are international financial elite houses. For example, the Brunswick house.
The layman does not remember that the Dukes of Brunswick exist, he thinks that they are only in the novels of Maurice Druon.
And the dukes of Brunswick not only exist, but also sit in corporations.

For example, do you know about Ludwig of Saxony? In the 19th century there was such a mad king, a representative of the Saxon dynasty, who rebuilt Munich.
Now you are distantly remembering her, and whether she is or not is indifferent to you.
But she exists beautifully.
The prince, the current heir to this dynasty, is a charming forty-year-old playboy, racing driver, he sits on the Board of Directors of General Motors, oversees gigantic financial flows.
And his dad, heir to the Saxon throne, wore an SS uniform during the war .

And no one asked him for it, on the contrary, he is considered an aristocrat who suffered from the heavy wretched "brown" regime of shopkeepers, lumpen, who challenged the cultural heritage of the empire of the great German people, people Bach, Goethe, Kant.

To which the Prince of Saxony is related, but Hitler and members of the Nazi Party do not.
At one time he wore an SS uniform, as a result they apologized to him, shook hands, said,
that they understand how much he had to endure over these 12 years.

His son is married to a British princess, he is one of the informal financial gentlemen.
Do you know how many dynasties exist today? About 30 ruling houses, as overthrown,
never overthrown.
For example, the Bulgarian dynasty - Tsar Boris and his descendants. They do not rule, but the house exists.
They automatically get jobs in companies that generate money in gigantic quantities.

- Will Europe win this confrontation?

GD: Yes, Europe will win. And the headquarters of this dynasty is London.
(W* Error. Headquarters in Germany).
because the royal dynasty is the assemblage point, to which all other houses are tied.

This is a complex mycelium that has not gone away. The selected houses of Rajasthan, the Hashimid dynasties,
king of jordan,
the Malaysian aristocracy also belongs there (and this is a very serious dynasty - the sultans).

These are clubs that develop attitudes. These people are very closely connected with the highest stratum of the priestly hierocracy.
The so-called clergy, which is already an invisible part of the world establishment.
In this area, differences between confessions no longer play any role.

Here the Dalai Lama is the same spiritual teacher as the Pope.
Prince Charles has Sufi teachers - sheikhs who teach him Sufism, but in parallel, he considers himself an associated Orthodox.
He has a cell on Athos, where he often comes to meditate.
Michael of York is also no stranger to Sufism, but in addition, his spiritual contacts also include Tibet.
Not the one in the People's Republic of China, but some higher, invisible Tibet, which is in exile.

By the way, the Nepalese royal family is also part of this establishment. Oddly enough, all members of this Nepalese royal family are leftists and Maoists, or have been.
It's a very interesting environment.
Because for suckers, they usually write about Hollywood actors, about pop singers, about certain figures like Princess Diana or Charles.
As a rule, members of the elite of this class get into the gossip column only if some earl marries some Hollywood actress.
And so they are of no interest to anyone. However, on the recommendation of some Belgian baron, you can enter anywhere. At least to the office of the Aga Khan.
And already on the recommendation of the Aga Khan, you can go to the next world and come back.
In any case, the Aga Khan is a person who controls incredibly powerful financial flows, has a multibillion-dollar fund, while the Aga Khan is a descendant of British princesses.
This is the force that President Bush and his frostbitten team are dealing with.

Icebreaker USA and the future oligarchy

- Maybe it makes sense to side with Bush in order to counter this force, which, in your opinion, is negative?

GD: From my point of view, both forces are negative. .

In terms of raw brutal danger, the United States is the No. 1 danger.
The United States has caused chaos, and in that chaos they will perish.
Because neither their legitimate, nor mobilization, nor other opportunities will be enough for them to resist the resistance.
Now in the United States, very large segments of the modern economy are no longer needed, since the whole world imported goods into the United States in order to earn paper dollars.
People bring goods, get printed cut pieces of paper for it, and are happy.
Once this country was a smithy of weapons; in the first and second world wars, the United States was completely self-sufficient.
And today it is a country that only imports and does not produce anything itself. She can no longer flood the world with stew, jeans, office equipment. Jeans are made in Singapore, China. 90% of office equipment sold is not made in the United States.
And if chaos comes, the American economy will collapse.

And what prevents them from managing this chaos and getting dividends on it?

GD: Controlling chaos is like nullifying it as a resource from which it receives funds. And it is difficult to control not through chaos, because organized, he resists and goes on the counteroffensive. It's a vicious circle.
And so today the United States is an angry behemoth that is directly dangerous.
The US is bombing and killing people.
According to UNESCO experts, after 1945, from 16 to 24 million men, women and children died in the world in the aggression provoked and unleashed by the United States. 16 is a conservative estimate, 24 is the maximum. Let's say we stop at the figure of 20 million, but this is more than the estimated number of those killed on the fronts of the First World War.
Only the Vietnamese from the "orange", from the bombing and so on, killed 5 million people.
Not to mention the fact that the United States is the first and only country to use nuclear weapons.
This is an angry hippopotamus that can tear off your leg and not notice, say that it happened.

Let's say they lose. What awaits us next?

GD: What will remain after the US plays its historical role as a kind of icebreaker that will break the system of international law and the existing relations between sovereign entities?
In the new situation, there will remain a globalist super-empire of elites based on TNCs and international bureaucracy, international police forces.
And on the other hand - the world ghetto.

A huge population of the planet, which will be deprived of state sovereign functions.
Everyone will be transferred to the category of the exploited population, from which the cream is skimmed off and at the same time kept in a state torn away from history.

The technological level of the modern elite and its environment is such that it can close on itself all the information, organizational, natural resources of the globe, without involving the services, forces, blood, health of a huge number of people.
Most people become irrelevant.
Democracy, the electoral system, politicians who are professional nominees from the municipality, the electorate, turn out to be unnecessary.
All this will become redundant.
We will fall into the cruel realm of the oligarchs. The extreme relations of the chessboard are built:
Black and white. On the one hand - to know, relying on great power, and on the other hand - the "City of God", as shown in the Brazilian film.
They have no other way but rebellion.

And here, in this simplification, we are moving into a new stage of storytelling and strategic planning, which is based on conflict, crisis, protest, and which allows the forces of Spirit and Justice to make a breakthrough.

What is this breakthrough? New revolution?

GD: This is a counter-elite breakthrough, but not at the level of Soviet Russia in 1917 - snow-covered St. Petersburg, Moscow.
It was a very raw, semi-finished situation.
The task, which has never been solved, is to really bring the counter-elite to the fore
as a global player.
Because all the attempts that have been made so far were made by an immature counter-elite - weak, unorganized, which constantly lost to the world establishment.

It was under the Jacobins, it was with the Bolshevik party.

The task is to bring out the counter-elite, because only they can open the closing shells of the mollusk towards history.
This mollusk is the dominant part of humanity, which will create a global empire and throw most of the population out of history.
This is a clam that is closed to history.
After that, nothing will happen, this nobility will become a theophany - a god walking in space,
on the other side of time.

This is the collective incarnation of Brahma in conjunction with the very nobility, which is the court of the Antichrist. And it will be established forever and ever.

And in order to prevent all this from happening, so that humanity is not merged beyond the limits of meaning,
this must be resisted.
History and meaning are closely linked.
History is a developing plot, which gives significance to our actions, our deeds, everything that happens.

The deeds of people should not be merged beyond meaning, as happened with the Egyptian slaves, about whom we know nothing, except that they carried jugs of grain, built pyramids, dug canals around the Nile. And then, if we know about them, it is because there is Egypt, which is part of history.

And if we imagine slaves who have not been preserved in historical reality, for example, the slaves of Carthage, about which we know nothing, except that he tried to destroy Rome.
These people disappeared without a trace and senselessly.
The same danger threatens the greater part of mankind after the situation becomes extremely simple.
In this situation, there is only a chance in counter-global thinking, only in the counter-elite.
There is a chance for those passionaries who will be ready to sacrifice themselves in order to prevent the historical night, the polar cosmic night, from finally descending on our earth.

Interviewed by Andrey Cherkasov
http://zvezda.ru/gnosis/2005/07/07/jemal.htm
Thanks for the tip ratibor59

p/s. In the game of elites, no one wins. Their confrontation can only be considered
like... socialist competition.
A breakthrough of the forces of Spirit and Justice from a ghetto of chipped and completely controlled people is impossible.
We have time before. We don't have a chance AFTER.
.
And something about the States. From the last..
The Rothschilds have dropped out of American assets. We wrote that they transferred “their economy” to China, to Asia in general.
But also the Rockefellers, tightly tied to industrial assets in the United States itself. "patriotic industrialists" finally lost the battle for the United States to "globalist financiers".
Conclusion for the world:
US default and the collapse of the global financial system. Civil War. The collapse of the state. Europe is also in for a shock. The scenario of World War III is relatively bloodless. Tight control over physical resources. Rothschild made a deal with China. Waiting for the third superpower ..

Non-Jewish American super-oligarchs are now buying land and real estate
in Chile and Argentina. Rockefellers, Ted Turner, Holdren, Fords and others.

The Rockefeller Foundation and Ted Turner have already bought about 2 million acres - or 8,094 sq. km
(for comparison: the area of ​​​​the whole of Moscow is 1081 square kilometers).
If it doesn't work like that, I use another comparison: the area of ​​the land they bought is 1/5 of the territory of Belgium.
Let me remind you: 40% of Russian lands have already been taken away from the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation.

The financial mafia is buying up countries..