What happened on the transfer of Roman Babayan. Fight in the program "Right to vote": full version

Roman Babayan is a Russian correspondent and host of the Right to Vote program on the TVC channel. During his career, he has worked in 54 countries of the world, including hot spots in Russia and abroad.

Childhood and youth

Roman Babayan was born on December 7, 1967 in the capital of Azerbaijan - Baku. Mom is Russian, dad is Armenian. His maternal ancestors were from Karabakh, after 1917 they moved to Baku. The future TV presenter received his name from his grandfather. He sang at the Mariinsky Theatre. During a tour of Azerbaijan, he decided to stay in Baku and open an opera theater. My father was from Kirovabad.

The boy studied at secondary school No. 82, after which he entered the Polytechnic Institute. At the end of the second year, the guy was drafted into the army. Roman served in Hungary as part of the Southern Group of Soviet Forces.

Upon his return, he was restored at the university. But unexpectedly for everyone in the country, the Karabakh conflict began. According to Roman himself, classes were canceled and all students were sent to the rally. When the young man saw the slogans “Death to the Armenians” in the column, he realized that he was not going further with these people.

Roman Babayan in the army

Then he decided to move to Moscow, where he entered the Institute of Communications. Roman graduated in 1991 and immediately began working as an engineer in the technical directorate of Radio Russia at the VGTRK television and radio company. He is fluent in English and Turkish. Roman's parents were always proud of their son, it didn't matter to them what profession he would choose and what successes he would achieve.

Journalism and television

Roman Babayan worked at VGTRK for 2 years. But since my student days, I dreamed of being a correspondent, one who seeks and finds the hottest news. He decided to change his cozy office to work as a journalist. Since 1993, he began working as a correspondent in the Vesti program.

Often, Roman Georgievich reported from hot spots, although the journalist himself does not like this combination, as and when he is called a war correspondent. The man says he has always been interested in crisis journalism. First, he covered the events of the civil war in Tajikistan, then in Chechnya. After Chechnya, he went to Afghanistan.

Since 1997 he has been in Yugoslavia. When NATO announced the start of hostilities in 1999, the Yugoslavs decided to close the borders to entry. He and his cameraman Boris Agapkin remained at that time almost the only film crew from Russia in the country. They tried to transmit daily materials to Russia through the local television center.

Roman led one of his reports right during the bombing in Belgrade. In 2000, he was awarded the NATO medal "For participation in the NATO peacekeeping operation in Kosovo". Although Roman himself said in an interview that he was a true opponent of this so-called peacekeeping operation. In 2000, Roman Babayan was invited to Channel One. He became a political columnist for the Vremya program.

In 2003, he went on a business trip to Iraq. The first missile attack on Iraq found Roman's film crew in Baghdad. As a result, he managed to leave the country only after the United States entered the capital. At the same time, his film “Iraq. One hundred days without Saddam. Babayan was recognized as a laureate of the "Press-ELITE" award.

No less successful was his film Santiago. Chile. 30 years later”, telling about the events in Chile in 1973. Roman managed to interview the former Secretary General of the Chilean Communist Party, Luis Corvalan. By the way, Roman Babayan was the only journalist who managed to meet with.

From 2005 to 2012, he worked on Channel Three. He was the editor-in-chief of the Main Theme and Conclusions programs. In 2008 he became a TV presenter of the information program "City".

In 2010, the TVC channel offered Roman airtime. At that time, he already had something to offer the public. Soon the audience saw the new format of the show. Every evening, popular journalists and influential politicians appeared on the air of the Right to Vote program, they discussed current topics, expressed their opinion on a particular situation. Soon, the editors even stopped looking for “guests” on the show themselves, specialists from different fields themselves wanted to get on the program.

Not once in the studio conflicts broke out between the participants of the show. But in 2016, Roman himself could not stand it. In response to an unflattering remark about Russians by Polish journalist Tomasz Maciejczuk, he threw his folder of papers at him and asked him to leave the studio.

And although Babayan immediately stepped aside, the conflict continued. All the guests of the TV show participated in it. The skirmish continued until the Ukrainian deputy Igor Markov hit Matseychuk in the face. Filming of The Right to Vote has been halted. This program was not aired on the channel.

In 2017, Roman Babayan became the winner of the TEFI award in the nomination "Host of the Prime Time Socio-Political Talk Show".

Personal life

Roman met his wife Marina Chernova at work - on the set in the VGTRK studio. She worked as a sound engineer. They got married in 1995. They had three sons - George, Herman and Robert.

Since Babayan was constantly on business trips, he repeatedly expressed his regrets in interviews about the fact that the childhood of children passed almost without him.

As Roman Babayan notes, the most important thing in life is family and peace.

Roman Babayan now

In 2016, he left the post of TV presenter "Right to vote". As it turned out, he decided to run for the post of deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation from A Just Russia. As a result, the man was not elected to the State Duma and soon returned to television.

In 2018, as before, he hosts the Right to Vote program on the TV Center TV channel. And the TV presenter regularly writes posts in

Roman G. Babayan - Russian TV journalist and correspondent, known today primarily as the host of the popular talk show "Right to vote" on the television channel "TV Center". Although he used to do much more dangerous work around the world. Roman is also a distant relative of the famous singer - Roxana Babayan. And he can compete with her in his popularity.

Roman is a unique public figure. This is confirmed by his interesting creative biography, including work as a war correspondent in hot spots, and the position of editor-in-chief, and other interesting projects in his life. And everywhere Roman did his job perfectly and was in his place.

general information

Roman Babayan was an eyewitness to many important political events of our time. During his career, he managed to visit 54 countries, made reports from North Ossetia, Ingushetia, the Chechen Republic, Tajikistan, Georgia, Transnistria, and this is not the whole list of hot spots where he managed to visit. Today, Roman is a well-known host of the analytical program “Right to Vote” on TVC. This program is very popular with viewers.

Of course, a person like Roman Babayan has a biography, personal life and work that are interesting and exciting. You can verify this by reading this article.

Curriculum vitae

The novel was born in 1967 in the city of Baku, Azerbaijan SSR, into an Armenian family. At first, he wanted to connect his life with a profession far from journalism, but fate turned out differently, and this contributed to a change in his plans. After studying for 2 years at the radio engineering faculty of the Azerbaijan Polytechnic Institute, Roman went to serve in the army. The service took place in Hungary in parts of the Airborne Forces.

During the time spent in the army, Roman Georgievich decided to radically change the choice of his future profession. This was influenced by both the service itself and the situation in the country. After returning home, he moved to the Moscow Institute of Communications at the Faculty of Television and Radio, after graduating from which he became an engineer in television and radio broadcasting.

Becoming a life path

In September 1991, Roman Babayan was hired by the All-Russian State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company as an engineer in the department for preparing and broadcasting radio programs of the Radio Russia News Service. In 1993, Roman changed this profession to the bread of a correspondent. Since that time, his whole life has completely changed and was entirely devoted to the new position.

Such work requires great sacrifice and considerable courage. To make an up-to-date documentary report, he had to constantly travel around the world, sometimes being in life-threatening places.

In the same 1993, he was summoned to the editor-in-chief of the Radio Russia News Service, Alexei Abakumov, where he met with the editor of the Vesti program, Alexander Nekhoroshev. He suggested that Roman Babayan do the work in the news on television. The biography of the TV journalist has become much more interesting with the acceptance of this important proposal.

Primary activity

From 1993 to mid-2000, Roman worked in the Vesti program. And then he moved to the post of political observer of the program "Time" of the First Channel. After that, he led the information program "City" on the "Third Channel".

Roman Babayan's achievements and merits have been recognized with numerous awards, including the Order For Personal Courage, the NATO Medal For Participation in the Peacekeeping Operation in Kosovo, the Medal for Strengthening the Combat Commonwealth and the Combat Brotherhood.

While working, Roman often found himself in life-threatening situations. So, in 1999, he filmed reports right under the bombing in Belgrade. He also visited Chechnya and Baghdad.

Roman became the presenter on the TV Center channel after being invited to the position of chief editor in the final program “Conclusions” by Pyotr Tolstoy. One day, his management decided that it would be interesting if this program began to come out from them. They called it "Sunday Time" and invited many of Babayan's colleagues there. Roman began to create another program - “The Main Theme. Results".

A case from one's life

Roman Babayan told about an incident that happened to him during a business trip in Israel. Then he, along with the operator, went to breakfast every morning at the same pizzeria. On one of those days, when Roman and a friend were only 50 meters from this cafe, literally in front of their eyes the pizzeria took off into the air along with the visitors. Roman Babayan and his cameraman miraculously survived.

At times like this, you think about a lot. As Roman Babayan says: "Parents, children, wife and your life is all that you have, everything that needs to be protected." And agree, he is right!

"Right to vote" on TVC

Roman coped well with new projects. Later, the program "Right to Vote" appeared. Today this program has become one of the highest rated political talk shows. When the program was just beginning its existence, there was not a single program on television like it. The broadcast of this program was daily, and the guests were real experts and experts in their field.

After three months of the existence of the show, a whole line of high-ranking officials was formed who wanted to participate in the project. By this indicator, one can easily judge how popular and interesting this program is.

Personal life

Such an eventful life of the correspondent did not prevent him from creating a wonderful family and having three children. All the main and personal time of Babayan passed in the professional field. Even with his future wife, Marina Chernova, Roman met at work. Together at the same time they got a job at the VGTRK company, and already in 1995 they got married. The couple have three joint sons. According to Roman Babayan: “Children are our future. The whole world depends on them." Today, this person can spend much more time with his family and friends than in the old days, but work still occupies a large place in his life. Roman Babayan's wife understands him in everything, because she also works in this area.

We must not forget the importance of native roots. After all, only with the help of a wonderful family can such a strong, highly moral and courageous person as Roman Babayan grow up. His parents at first had some difficulties due to the fact that his mother was Russian and his father was Armenian. But as a rule, all the difficulties are only beneficial.

Among interesting additional skills, Babayan also has good language skills. The journalist and presenter is fluent in English and Turkish. Roman Babayan, whose biography, personal life and work we have reviewed in this review, achieved his success at the cost of great work.

Conclusion

Roman Babayan has worked on thousands of reports of world importance and many documentaries. This man was able to combine hard work and at the same time maintain family happiness. The most important thing in our life, as Roman Babayan notes, is family and peace. Nothing more expensive exists. Roman Babayan's wife is a truly happy woman, because her husband is a responsible and loving person who always remembers his family and friends. Roman is a unique public person, he is distinguished by his excellent knowledge of his business, courage and excellent communication skills.

Today, few people have not heard of such a person as Roman Babayan. The biography, personal life and professional successes of the journalist are of interest to many fans of his talent. But whoever you are, you should always remember that family and love are the basis of our being.

I don’t like the Babayan, he interrupts and lies a lot.

It is unbearable to listen to Babayan's self-promotion, he invites to the program "Khokhlyat cattle, the Baltic underdogs and shitty liberals, for example, the state traitor Nadezhdin and the oblique bastard spitefulness. They are excitedly discussing how to destroy Russia?! I really want personal responsibility for the chosen topics of discussion and invited Babayan. It just insults me humiliation of my country on the Day of lifting the blockade of Leningrad!Maybe a leading masochist?

Boev Nikolay Vladimirovmch

I wanted to watch the program - 4-5 people are talking about their own at the same time .. Everyone is probably right. Who are you talking to? Why can't I hear your argument? Who are you working for? There is only one line between you and me. Why do you connect 6 people to my ear who are talking at the same time. I can only hear one person - this is what I turned on your channel for. If I don’t hear what everyone is talking about at the same time, fuck you.

The transfer is boring. Babayan shuts up people who say sensible things.

Sergey Nikolaevich

I want to leave a review from the entire Krasnodar Territory. How long will you test our patience? Why are you inviting stubborn Bendera people to the program, who constantly lie on all talk shows, where they are also invited for some reason? They insult Russia, us, and we are forced to listen to them, hoping that someone will give them a decent answer. Nevermind. Only stroking Bendera on the head. It's been the same thing for 4 years now. When will you get tired of it yourself? Or money does not smell?

Fomin Sergey sfomin60

Why was Kareiba allowed to bang his shoe on the table and not kicked out the transfers and the countries out with a ban on coming to Russia

Roman Babayan is rapidly turning into a major political figure. Therefore, he has the right to interrupt everyone, impose his own and turn the discussion in a completely different direction, and then in a third direction. Smarter. In his opinion. He didn't let anyone finish. This is a mess. Pay close attention to the speakers, comrade!

Advantages: Not

Disadvantages: Whole program

The program does not live up to its name. The discussion of topics is chaotic, by the middle of the issue it is impossible to remember how the discussion began.

Experts in the studio behave inadequately. One gets the impression that yelling at a person expressing his opinion about a serious situation (often the right one, however, it is lost in a senseless argument) is better than just listening to him. Attitude towards people with a different point of view is openly aggressive. It becomes a shame for the host and some experts who are not supported by the rules of etiquette and offend everyone they want. Watching the program is unpleasant, constant screams cause a headache.

Solutions to the problem are not mentioned. Everyone just screams. I don't recommend the program.

Advantages:

• Don't like it all.

A bunch of slackers chatting among themselves. You who chatter go and solve these problems, and do not scratch your tongues. Are you paid for this?

Advantages:

• sometimes there are people with their own opinion

Disadvantages:

• not objective Babayan

From the beginning, I really liked this program, but then, after the beginning of the Ukrainian events, I practically stopped watching it. Babayan completely ceased to like him, a firm conviction of his bias appeared, he easily shuts up the opponents of the official version of events, openly takes the side of the defenders of officialdom, possessing a sharp mind and a large amount of information skillfully manipulates facts in his favor. Very rarely, but I look if interesting people are present, and when Markov or Zheleznyak appear, I immediately turn it off, it's disgusting. Probably Babayan is right in his own way - start telling the truth - they will close the program, but you have to feed your family.

Neutral Feedback

Deputies would be invited and asked about their activities on the territory of Russia

"advertise????
We all understood that now in this Duma she will poke HER relatives (Her husband KHACHATUR) with budget money for cutting. HER is now not clear who and how appointed the head of the faction of work on CULTURE, and the minister said that a lot of money was spent on culture in Russia. Now This Yampolskaya Thinker, together with Husband Khachyaatur and the so-called producers like DADISHYAN and the company, will cut the general budget of the country ????"

Igor Alexandrovich

Somehow, I don’t understand, did the Americans study the history of Russia? What is the impact on us? Somehow, some types came and shouted, Russian give up us arda, to which we answered and SHIT!!! and it always has been and always will be

Advantages:

• Competent presenter
• Current Topics.

Disadvantages:

• The leader is not in control
• Everyone yells at the same time.

Good program, good host. But Babayan is not in control of the situation. Everyone is yelling at the same time, and the host cannot clean up the mess. I have to switch because it's annoying.

Advantages:

• Interesting

Disadvantages:

• Casting of participants is not always successful

The professionalism of the presenter and the team that creates the program "RIGHT OF THE VOICE" deserves a good assessment. Special thanks to the host Roman Babayan. The selection of guests and experts with different points of view is well balanced. However, I really hope that you will become less likely to invite a certain Maria Shteiman to participate in this program, since not only her personal point of view (“we have enough political non-constructive Protestants”) is hard to perceive, but her screeching voice, clogging everyone and everything, as well as eternal flaunting in the style of "everything is shit, I'm the queen." Honestly, I can’t watch the program because of her, it has a negative effect on the brain: - / Thank you for your attention to my opinion.

Positive reviews

The best of all political shows. The merit in this is exclusively Roman Baboyan. Unfortunately, the transmission format is such that everyone can scream at once, but Roman masterfully copes with this. Handsome, smart, intelligent. Thanks.

Irina Nikolayevna

Thank you for the program "Social Revolution" of July 31 of this year. For the first time on the central channel I heard unbiased and professional assessments of the upcoming pension reform, and in general, the state of the economy. I'm surprised they didn't talk about retirees skydiving or bowling (laugh). Ashamed should be a deputy from the United Russia (Mikhail Starshinov, it seems). He spoke a lot, well - very streamlined! As a result, he didn't say anything. However, this is another evidence of the degradation of United Russia - they do not hear people. I will be 63 years old this year, I see how ordinary people live around - the pension reform will be a murder for them. And who, tell me, will help raise a generation? Grandmothers will disappear like a class.

Advantages:

• Interesting
• without screaming
• clear and understandable information.

Disadvantages:

• Until I noticed.

Unlike many programs known to us, where everyone shouts something and you can’t make out who is talking about anything, in this program everything is more correct - a well-known figure or official is invited and he is asked questions in turn and receives full answers to them. No one interrupts anyone and you can at least understand something.

High-level officials or well-known figures, I think, would not come to a bad program and a bad host, but they appear regularly on this program, hence the conclusion - the program is good. Yes, and it has been on the TVC channel for a very long time, but would a bad program with a low rating really be kept on the channel for so long!

However, everyone has their own opinion, but I personally like "Right to vote".

Advantages:

• Decent behavior, both of the presenter and experts from the Russian side
• On the face of a high level of culture of behavior.

Disadvantages:

• This Tatyana from the Ukrainian Gestapo does not shut up at all. Mute her microphone. She is disgusting to listen to.

The Ukrainian side clearly shows the limitations of thinking. It is simply amazing how sincerely they lie and dodge answers. They discredit the entire Ukrainian people.

Advantages:

• I like the program.

Disadvantages:

• More heroes, not screamers and onlookers.

Roman Babayan, for you.

My homeland is Russia, the small homeland is Moscow Region, Krasnogorsk, and looking at cowards, traitors, Khokhlyad men is just to the point of vomiting. I'm talking about those who fled to Moscow, and yapping from Moscow like Tobacco. After all, everyone fled to Moscow, and not to their own people in Novorossia. As after the victory of the defenders of Novorossia, they will look into the eyes of people who shed their blood, lost their loved ones, lived in hardship and torment, but won, and did not flee to Moscow.

I would send them to Kolyma, to Magadan, if they don’t want to defend it from their homeland, then let them live there. And then Ishchenko first of all said that he left property worth $ 1 million, but the fact that people in Novorossia leave their lives for their homeland is for him later, because he can fight for his homeland only in comfortable conditions, he even went hiking with a glass a mug and a china plate, and probably only with a blue border, like Americans, they definitely need toilet paper, and without it they don’t go into battle, for obvious reasons, The so-called journalist Kot, only yells, Markov, Oleinik Vetrov and deputies of the VII convocation, who were deprived of power, they all have pathos, paranoia, cunning, they are not even needed by people in Novorossia, they are not needed anywhere, and I would not want to see them in my homeland, let them go to defend their homeland, on their territory, help morally, they help to restore Novorossia, because there is a lot of work there. And they need toilet paper. After all, any Russian - a man, in such a situation will not run to Kyiv, but will defend his homeland to the last drop of blood. Roman, after all, you asked - if people in Ukraine are against the regime, then where are these people? But they didn't get a solid answer.

Real people - unfortunately only in New Russia. The women did not run away, neither Bondarenko, and apparently Berezhnaya, too, and some others, I don’t remember their names, but I saw them on Russian channels. And Bondarenko has an OH situation in general - her guards are Trojan horses, unfortunately I don’t know how many of these horses, and she is not afraid, and did not RUIN to Moscow. The real Elena of Troy. Oles Buzina is a true patriot of his people. I would forbid the listed men from even pronouncing the name Olesya from their mouth - this is ... We have our own Kots, Ishchenkos, Markovs, Oleinikovs, Vetrovs, etc., unfortunately, there are a lot of such shame. And we do not need such a shame. They should be shown on television as an example of cowardice, betrayal, cunning. And these, on our screens, have become stars, an example of courage, love for the Motherland, love for their people, and this is thanks to you too, sorry. And now they are fighting for their Motherland, they are not fleeing from it - courageous, honest, beautiful -

Ukrainian Women!!! Yes, there are women in Russian villages...

Thanks to Sergei Minaev that his programs are without pathos, paranoia and there is no imposing of an opinion in them, (sometimes this slips through Roman) they have a dialogue, and we draw our own conclusions.

Sincerely!

Igor Smirnov.

Advantages:

• Always hot political issues are discussed

Disadvantages:

The talk show "Right to vote" (TVC) is a very lively and interesting TV show. I have been watching it for a long time, different people are interesting in it with their opinions, discussions, mainly of a political and economic nature. The topic of the program always surprises - always fresh battles about this or that current issue in the world.

The TV presenter of this program, Roman Babayan, approaches each question very competently, spins the topic “to the fullest,” as they say, asks a lot of thorough questions, listens carefully. He leads this program very competently - it is always interesting to watch it.

I advise you to watch this TV show and you will be aware of all social and political events.

Advantages:

• democracy
• openness to ideas
• publicity

I recommend daily viewing of up-to-date, lively discussions on topics that are significant for many people (social, first of all), which dynamically take place between supporters of different points of view, experts and viewers in a democratic way conducted by experienced hosts of the RIGHT TO VOTE program on the TV center. I am especially concerned about education, health care and culture, which today are turning into an INDUSTRY of "renting" our souls, minds, bodies in order to SUCCESSFULLY zombify (according to American, Anglo-Saxon models) and effectively manage public opinion of members of Russian society who think simplistically in line with the learned clichés , which someone needs to make standard-digestible for digestion by "Atlantes". CINEMA becomes KLIPOLEPON, spectacle POP: THEATER (Petersburg Alexandrinka, for example) - DIED! (long live GAD-same-TARTR with schizoCAKOphony of images and sounds); education (both school and university) is turning into a conveyor production of stamp-minded IT managers for various types of INDUSTRIES; medicine is minimized in the Human-Person interaction (DOCTOR-patient) to unified production lines according to the standards of "high-tech" methods of diagnosing and standard schemes for pharmacological (chemical) relief (circumcision of symptoms) ... I recommend about all this and much more: look, think , speak out...

Advantages:

• democracy
• openness to ideas
• realism and urgency of the problems

The program "Right to Vote" compares favorably with other "talking shops" broadcast on other channels. It differs, first of all, in a real and comprehensive discussion of the problem, which does not flow into the "washing of the bones" of some abstract aunt Motya from the village of Kukuyevo (which is what Malakhov and Co., Zelensky and similar characters broadcast on other federal TV channels sin). It's nice that not only the invited experts are given the opportunity to speak (and these are, as a rule, professors, rectors of prestigious universities, specialists in the field of culture / medicine / other spheres of life, and not stars, models and actors), but also the audience.

And it is doubly pleasant that they do not speak in the manner: "Aaaaaa, but what is the creator of something, good people!", But quite intelligently state their position.

The hosts - Natalia Metlina and Roman Babayan - are extremely tactful towards everyone present in the studio. They are serious, but they can both joke and smile without slipping into clowning.

In principle, the topics discussed on different channels in programs are the same. The only difference is in the presentation of the topic. But, you see, the perception of it by the consumer directly depends on the presentation of information...

Advantages:

• openness to ideas
• different points of view
• realism and urgency of the problems
• good presenter

Recently I got hooked on this show, although I stopped watching TV a few years ago. The transmission captivates by the fact that there are absolutely different, if not opposite, points of view in the discussion, which is always good, does not allow one or the other to relax, and it is very exciting for the viewer to observe and listen to the participants. Trying to shout and shut up the opponent will not work, since the number on one side and the other is equal.

In general, in the light of recent events in the world, a couple of good political programs have appeared that are not very disgusting to watch. And finally, conscience kicked in, they stopped giving the one-sided, already fed up opinion of five or six unsettled would-be politicians everywhere, and started inviting journalists, human rights activists, as far as possible from different countries with different points of view.

I advise you to look.

A fight in the studio prevented the next episode of the "Right to vote" program from being aired by TVC. Fragments of what happened during the recording that got on the Web have already caused heated discussion. However, some moments did not hit the Internet.

With a few blows, the Odessa politician Igor Markov sent the Polish nationalist Tomasz Maciejchuk, no, not knocked out, but simply out of the studio. Moreover, the fight almost escalated into a mass one. Voluntarily, the guest who provoked the conflict did not want to leave. Several other participants in the program persuaded him at once.

- Get out of here, get out of here!

- I have a right to my point of view. When you call Poles prostitutes, isn't that an insult?

— What are you yelling? We are here in our own country.

From the very beginning, the intensity of passions in the studio was not just high. Went off scale. On one hand from the host Roman Babayan are Russian political scientists and Ukrainians who consider Maidan a coup. On the other - supporters of the current Kiev authorities. The 26-year-old Polish nationalist Tomas Maciejczuk is also here. The young man himself appears as a military reporter, political scientist and public figure. He was banned from entering Ukraine for five years, he seems to be fighting Ukrainian neo-fascist movements. At the same time, he advocates the strengthening of NATO in Eastern Europe, as he is convinced that Russia can attack Poland.

The announced theme of the program is "Shatun on the Maidan". But instead of discussing what Ukraine has achieved 3 years after the coup d'etat, literally from the first minutes the conversation turned first to bizarre accusations, and then to insults.

“It was you who killed the Jews. You personally. You drank the blood of children.

- I heard a lot about myself, but that I killed Jews. First time. I don’t even know how to react,” Roman Babayan was surprised at such accusations.

The host repeatedly tried to direct the discussion in a constructive direction, asking specific questions, for example, about the current state of the Ukrainian economy, Petro Poroshenko's income increased several times during his presidency, and the reaction to Oliver Stone's film Ukraine on Fire. In response: the American film director needs to smoke less marijuana and point out the Kremlin as the main screenwriter, Ukraine is an independent country that lives within its means and, finally, finds itself in this world.

The Pole Tomasz Matseychuk worked on two fronts at once: he quarreled with experts from Ukraine regarding the Essessian division of Galicia, consisting of Ukrainian volunteers, and got involved in a dispute over the average salary in Russia, which this year is 32 thousand rubles. Confusing it with the minimum wage, which so far does not even reach 8 thousand, the Polish nationalist was happy for Romania, they say, they earn more there than in Russia.

"I want to congratulate Romania on the victory. And you know why, because today in Romania the average salary is higher than in Russia. In Poland, the average salary is now 70,000 a month. The minimum salary here is 7,000," said the young Pole.

One could object to the Pole - in the European Union itself, Romania is considered one of the poorest countries, whose inhabitants massively go to work abroad, and everyone in England knows about Polish plumbers. But Matseychuk, it seems, wanted to say something else - nasty things about Russia.

Matseychuk: "Ukrainians also want to live like normal people, and not in shit like you. Not in shit like Russians."

Political scientist Sergei Mikheev: "Poles and Ukrainians sell everything for money."

Roman Babayan: "Did I hear correctly that we live in shit?"

Maceychuk: "That's right."

In such situations, the journalist must always be above the fray. But as a person, Roman Babayan simply could not restrain himself and in a sharp form demanded to leave the studio.

Mikheev: "Are you crazy or something? You, sheep, get out of here! Get out! Just try to twitch, get out of here. Roman, we need to get him out of here."

"Roman Babayan himself behaved completely correctly. Of course, it is impossible to allow such people to swagger over the people of Russia, insult them on Russian TV. And Roman did the right thing by kicking him out of the studio. This nationalist Pole provoked a conflict," he wrote on his page in